Kitzhaber pulling out the stops to keep Nike expansion in Oregon
»Play Video
SALEM, Ore. – Governor John Kitzhaber took the extraordinary step on Monday of ordering a special session of the Oregon Legislature to push through a tax plan aimed to help Nike, Inc. significantly expand in the state.
Kitzhaber said Nike approached the state saying they want to expand operations in Oregon, but they need certain guarantees that current tax structures won’t change, which could hurt their investment.
The governor said Nike is being courted by other states and that he is acting with a sense of urgency to give Nike the assurances they need to stay here.
“I do not make this extraordinary decision lightly, but Oregon has an extraordinary opportunity to boost our economy and create jobs,” Kitzhaber said.
Kitzhaber is proposing a system where businesses who want to make significant investments in Oregon could negotiate with the state to ensure the current tax structure stays in place for a set amount of time.
In order to make any deal, a company would have to commit to creating 500 jobs and investing $150 million in capital projects over a five year period.
Kitzhaber argues that the plan is not a tax break, but a tool the state can use to attract large businesses
The special session will be held on Friday. Kitzhaber said he hopes lawmakers can talk through the proposal and reach a deal within a day.
“They are being courted by a number of other states but they have said if we can provide them with certainty in their investment they will sign on the dotted line now,” Kitzhaber said.
Kitzhaber said the Nike expansion will create 12,000 new jobs in Oregon by 2020 with a potential economic impact of $2 billion a year.
Nike has not provided specifics about their expansion and would only confirm it would add at least the minimum 500 jobs required under the plan.
Construction related to the expansion will also create 440 new jobs, Kitzhaber said.
“Nike is a global company with a long history in Oregon. We support this proposed legislation as a way to help us continue to grow in Oregon,” said Don Blair, Nike's chief financial officer.
“This is a huge win for the state of Oregon,” Kitzhaber said.
After the announcement, prominent lawmakers from both sides of the aisle voiced their support for the plan.
"In the campaigns every one of us said we have to create jobs. Everybody wants us to do something about jobs. The truth is that most of the time, as a state, we are very limited in what we can do to create jobs. This is a rare opportunity and we’re not going to miss it," said Senate President Peter Courtney, a Democrat. "We’re going to send a signal to the rest of the country by coming into special session and taking action."
House Co-Speaker Bruce Hanna, a Republican, also supports the governor's proposal.
"The legislation we will move during the special session is a simple way to create enormous long-term benefit for our state, its people and its economy," Hanna said. "While special sessions are never ideal, this opportunity for Oregon demands immediate action."
State Senator Mark Hass, a Democrat, tweeted his support of the proposal.
"Nike wants to make a long term commitment to Oregon. We should make a long term commitment to Nike," he tweeted.
Some economists worry about proposal
The governor argues that this deal would help Oregon's economy, but two economists told KATU the deal would help Nike and just Nike.
Under the proposal outlined by Kitzhaber on Monday, the governor would be able to negotiate these deals with companies as long as they commit to adding 500 jobs and making a $150 million investment.
Tigard-based economist Bill Conerly argues that it's bad policy to set up a subjective system like that.
"I'm looking forward to Nike expanding; that's a positive. But I don't think we should make special deals," Conerly said. "I don't think the governor should be allowed to make special deals with some companies while leaving others behind."
It's not clear exactly how much Nike would stand to benefit from this deal. While they have to release total income tax liability in Securities and Exchange Commission filings, they don't have to disclose their specific state income tax liability.
Some economists we spoke with also noted that the 12,000 jobs number over 13 years represents less than one percent of total jobs in the state.
"It's not a game-changer, but it's a nice boost," Conerly said.
Changes at Nike
Nike employs 44,000 people globally, including 8,000 in Washington County, home to its world headquarters in the Portland suburb of Beaverton. The company said its Oregon workers make an average wage of more than $100,000.
Nike has been selling off brands and making other moves to focus on its most profitable businesses, which include its namesake Nike brand, Jordan, Converse and Hurley.
It sold its Cole Haan brand to private equity firm Apax Partners for $570 million in November and In October said clothing licensing company Iconix Brand Group Inc. would buy Umbro for $225 million.
Like most consumer product makers, Nike has faced rising costs for packaging, fuel and other raw materials.
In its most recent fiscal first-quarter, net income fell 12 percent as the boost from higher sales was offset by increased costs and ad spending. The company said then it was facing a slowdown of futures order growth, particularly in China. Those are orders from retailers of products that are scheduled for delivery between September 2012 and January 2013.
In November, Nike said it was boosting its dividend payment and planning a two-for-one stock split.
Companies typically split their stocks when they think the price of an individual share has gotten too expensive or if the stock is trading too far above similar companies' stock. Nike stock is up about 2 percent since the beginning of the year.
Nike built its current headquarters campus in Beaverton in 1990. It had a scuffle with city leaders in 2005 when it filed a lawsuit to find out if Beaverton leaders had plans for annexing company property. A judge found that city officials were in contempt for deliberately withholding public documents from Nike, including a draft annexation plan that showed city leaders considered forcing the company's headquarters into city limits in 2002. Nike got a 35-year exemption from forced annexation in Beaverton.
More: Read Kitzhaber's proclamation calling a special session
The Associated Press contributed to this report
Proposed legislation is not a tax break - this is about certainty for businesses committing to long-term investment & job creation in OR.
— John Kitzhaber (@GovKitz) December 10, 2012
Private sector job growth drives OR's econ recovery; the state can help create business climate to accelerate growth.
— John Kitzhaber (@GovKitz) December 10, 2012
Nike wants to make a long term commitment to Oregon. We should make a long term commitment to Nike.
— Mark Hass (@MarkHassOregon) December 10, 2012
Watch Kitzhaber's news conference announcing the special session:
I for one sure would like to see a copy of the bill to see exactly what was put into law, not the political spin
the gillnet fishermen are "private sector jobs" yet the governor wants to eliminate them after a million voters said no to measure 81
The gillnet fishermen have supported the state for over 100 years. yet the governor seems to think that shoes are more important than the small businesses run by the fishermen
another program to fleece the taxpayer. seems like a million voters who voted no on measure 81 don't matter but a sport shoe manufactuer can gain more from our governor
And in Michigan news, Liberals (union members) cry and wail about loosing yet another union vote.
Sooooo twisted corrupted Oregon - wassup with what is just another tax break being gifted to Nike?Â
Â
Oh, we need to reconvene and extraspecially pander to a corporation that has been EXTRA specially pandered to - for decades now? Wassup Johnny boy - got no spine, dude? Have to bear more taxation burden on us all - instead of COLLECT appropriate taxes from this corporation - like you should be encouraged your elected members of the people's legislature to MAN UP AND DO.Â
Â
Can't do the right thing - have to bend over and pander to Nike? All t he time? Remind the people this is Nike's state - and no one else's, John. And all of those other manufacturing busineses John Kitzxhaber and Ted Kulongoskis in the past ran out of this state? Stinks to high heaven for progressive leaders to ever admit they were WRONG to do that - to all of them.Â
Â
But then - it all gets cleaned up today -because John Kitzhaber is explaining to us all - why we need to BED DOWN and gift Nike with more and more and more extra special tax breaks and benefits - from us all. Sheez, Kitzhaber - you are bedded down with Phil Knight . All the way.Â
Good for you Mr. Kitzhaber for bringing jobs to Oregon. If you have to give them a tax break then that will help. Create more jobs, and improve the economy
Didnt do it in his first 8 years. Won't be succesful this time around either.
 @Rob C 503 Rob - you sound so sociliast government programmed and DUMB, down man. Really.Â
@englishdaisy ......what??
I wonder how much Phil baby had to promise to donate to the good Dr. ReRuns campaign to get this little special session underway.......
"Private sector job growth drives OR's econ recovery; the state can help create business climate to accelerate growth."
 Then why are you trying to kill off the small business owners? Why are you trying to kill of the commercial fishing industry"
I'll tell you why... There's not enough money for you to loot from small business.Â
 Go big or go home rerun.
Never let a good chance to screw the public go with out punishment to the residents of Oregon. Hold on here comes Jonney (again) and another one of his lame ways to screw the people that live here.Â
Â
My suggestion is to hold the line on the taxes and take the jobs but impose a tax on the overpaid athletes that grab huge fees doing comercials and take the money out of state.  Â
Â
Either way you voted him in and this is what you got.    Â
Hmm, a lot of people on this forum who would rather let something offend them (so they can complain about it)Â than actually do something about it but hey at least it's amusing...you go girls, and keep up the good work 'cause it makes me smile after a long day of work:-)
Capitalistic blackmail... its what made America great! Â I love Nike! Hey, and all this done without UNIONS!!!! I think I'm in need of some new shoes!Â
 @Penny Penny - as long as Phil Knight gets PROFIT for his bank account. That's all that matters. We little people can all bend over and give him more and more and more, right?Â
Â
And all of Phil's overseas workplace atrocities - John Kitzhaber just loves Knight's success story. Kitzhaber intends to take the gilded Oregon Pioneer off the top of the Capitol and place a child worker from Vietnam up there - a sign of all things WONDERFUL and humanity blessing - from all things Nike. To all of us.Â
Â
Yup. It's another stinking (to high heaven) Christmas Miracle from socialist hypocrite, progressive panderererererer John Kitzhaber.Â
 @Penny But I thought all you socialists were upset at Nike for exporting jobs overseas? Now that fearless leader has bent over and "Gasp" given them a sweet tax break... all of the sudden you have wet spots and hot flashes? Tell me this is not hypocritical?
 You looters will never let a free ride go will you?
 @Razor1 @Razor1 Um, I'm a capitalist pig. What ever gave you the idea I was liberal or a socialist. Obama is a joke and so is Kitz. I just love that Nike stood up for capitalism.Â
 @Penny Sorry Penny... I took your post out of context. My humble apologies.
OH BOY!! Uncle John, ad infinitum. A very sad example of a Donkey that really, really needs more of your tax dollars to spend on those less fortunate that choose to not work...
What a hypocritical load of horse manure. Kitzhaber, a liberal democrat extremist, wants to give the rich, giant corporation a 'tax break' in order to do what? Encourage them to invest in Oregon and therefore IMPROVE THE ECONOMY, by CREATING MORE JOBS.Â
Â
But wait! Liberal democrats insist that TAX BREAKS for businesses DON'T WORK!Â
Well well well!, isn't it odd that liberal Democrats now have to admit that LOWER TAXES HELP THE ECONOMY. LOL. Â Â
 @last boyscout Don't worry... John Galt is here to save them all.
@last boyscout ???
 @last boyscout The TAX FREEZE in this case will help because it's a contracted agreement. When the tax rate is moved (up or down) otherwise, there is no agreements and companies are free to do whatever they want. For job creation, need plays a much greater role than tax rates.
 @Morticae  @last boyscout  "need plays a much greater role ".
Because you "need" something that gives you the right to take it from the people that have earned it? I need a new Corvette... but I doubt you will give it to me... No I will have to go out and earn it. People "need" housing so that gives them the right to go and take it from the rightful owners? Because people need to have medical insurance that means i am obliged to provide them? I don't  think so... they must go out and earn it just like I do. I AM NOT GOING TO PAY YOUR WAY!
 @Kymberlie2873  @Morticae  @last boyscout I also took care of my Father without pay... why would anyone expect to be paid for something like that? I also worked a full time job, and was part time National Guard. I still managed to pay my way. OHP is nothing more than a welfare handout paid for by the working citizens of oregon.Â
 Tell me what you are doing now to support yourself... Handouts, or a physical job?
 @Razor1  @Morticae  @last boyscout Actually Razor1, a lot of people who receive state medical have already paid into it with their own tax dollars such as myself.  I get OHP now that I am an unpaid caregiver for my disabled senior father. YOU are not paying my way. I paid my own way by paying taxes while I was working in a very well paying job for over 20 years. That's like telling Senior Citizens they shouldn't get Medicare after paying into it for 40+ years. I receive no money from the state in any way, shape, or form. Nor would I take any. However, as far as medical goes, you bet! I was chosen during a lottery type draw after going 3 years without any insurance. It wasn't handed to me as you assume it is handed to everyone. Yes, there are leeches on the system. For that matter, there are leeches in life. But there are also a lot of people on the system that were once hard working tax paying people. People that YOU are not paying for. They pre-paid for themselves.
 @last boyscout Are you insinuating that Uncle John pushes a wheelbarrow of crap?? Just asking since nothing out of this dung-beetle's mouth has ever come to fruition, but more taxes so he spend them...Â
Only little people pay taxes. The rich find ways to avoid them.
@RalphCramden ....c'mon Ralph.
 @RalphCramden Except for the really low income people, they get earned income credit and other benefits.
 @SaltireÂ
Yes, they are net takers of the system and contribute nothing to it.
 @Razor1  @Saltire  @Kymberlie2873Â
Â
It's my rebel nature. I would have a very hard time accepting welfare. You are correct, it is not in my nature.
Â
Even now, being retired, I work almost every day. I just got back from a long trip and taking the day off.
 @RalphCramden  @Saltire  @Kymberlie2873 Ralph I like your attitude. I don't think you could ever live off of the backs of other people.... I just don't see you being that way. I commend you for your ideas... right on!
 One of these days I'm going to have to buy you a beer, and do some talking.
 @Saltire  @Kymberlie2873Â
Correct.
Â
I could divorce my wife of 38 years, give her the house, my investmens, and half of my retirement incomes and live with her and get food stamps and welfare and we would be better off that we are now.
Â
We would do that except that we like being married to each other.
Â
I really want to be a net taker of government services. I have been forced to pay into a corrupt system for 6 decades and want to get all that money back. So leaching off the government is actually appealing to me.
Â
As it is I use every government service I can get my hands on. I take advantage of every tax credit I can find even if I don't need it.
Â
My latest scheme is to buy a 2kw solar setup, and donate it to a charity. I will get about $15,000 back from the government in the form of tax credits and will be about to write off $20,000 in donations. I am working on the details with my CPA now. She thinks is is legal but has to make sure I won't get in trouble with the IRS. It would be like forcing the government to donate money to charities and giving me money to make that happen.
Â
My CPA loves my ideas as she uses them for her other clients to save them tax money also.
 @Kymberlie2873  @RalphCramden  @Saltire Low income does not mean leech. Low income people I know are working two jobs to make ends meet. Some people do require a hand.Â
Â
If you were to total up the contribution you made during your 20 years of paying into it, you would see that once you start collecting you will collect far more than you contributed. Your Dad paid into the system for 40 years, but his benefits will far exceed the amount he paid in.
Â
What distorts the system is situations where a person is better off staying in a low paying job and receiving government provided benefits, rather than taking a higher paying job that will result in the loss of those benefits. Case in point, http://campverdebugleonline.com/main.asp?SectionID=36&SubSectionID=73&ArticleID=36824.
 @Kymberlie2873  @SaltireÂ
Low income do not contribute to society. If your dad put into SS then he deserves every dime he put into it plus interest.
Â
If he didn't save during his working career on top of that then he is guilty of poor planning.
Â
I look forward to the day when the government runs out of money and welfare comes to an end. Then we can get back to basics where everyone works hard and contributes. The definition of disabled has gotten so distorted that just about anyone can get disability these days. There was a time when only those who really were disabled got government assistance. Now those on public assistance are nothing more than pariahs from where I sit.
Â
There are heroin addicts who get welfare because addiction is considered a disability.
Â
I am tired of paying for it and do everything I can to not pay taxes for this insanity. I also find every opportunity to cost government money. The more I can force them to spend the better. Then we can run out of money quicker and stop all this foolishness.
 @Kymberlie2873  @RalphCramden  @Saltire Let me get this straight. You quit your job, and moved in with your Father? You are living off of his SS benefits? And you rely on food stamps, and subsidies?Â
 You quit your job, and are living off of your Fathers SS benefits... And you are telling me not to look down my nose at you?
 I can't think of a more blatant case of "Leecieness" ( Don't think thats really a word, but it fits.)
 @RalphCramden  @Saltire I call BS. I paid into the system for over 20 years. My parents paid into for over 40 years each. Now that my Mom passed, my disabled senior Dad is low income so he receives food assistance and a medical discount of 25% on his prescriptions. I gave up my job to take care of him therefore I am low income too. We make due living on his SS. Low income does not necessarily mean leech. It means we make due with what we have but also have to take a little help to make it through each month. I pay the mortgage and utilities just like every other person. My Dad does get a bit of heat assistance each year as we have oil heat. Our food assistance is not enough to support one person but it's not meant to be. It's an aid, not a total support. I really wish people would see that the majority of people on assistance are not leeches. They are people who now are in need whether losing their jobs, illness, or even being senior citizens. How would you feel if you constantly had people look their nose down at you because you are lumped with a few who leech the system? I just ask that people think before making comments like this. Low income people DO contribute to the system and also to society.Â
Â
 @RalphCramden  @Saltire Well said Ralph!
Seems like a good deal to me. Not all companies are the same, so why should they be treated the same? There's nothing wrong with favoring a company that will add more to Oregon than other companies. People keep calling it a tax break, but it's a tax freeze, which is fine by me. Seems like a level headed decision.
 @Morticae Oh... so it's okay for "Some" people, but not for the "Others"? Because Phil Knight contributes so heavily to the democrat party that makes him different from... who?
"The company said its Oregon workers make an average wage of more than $100,000."Â Â BWAAAAHAAAAAA!!!!
Â
In other words, a few employees make several or tens of millions. The rest of them still all live in Beaverton and no Nike employee I know makes that much including one of the sysadmins. It's also worth noting that they have a lot of temp and contract labor that likely isn't part of their "company compensation."
Â
Still, though, even some Republicans are behind it.
 @Playanekes Phil Knight's income skews the average.
 @Saltire  @Playanekes Uh....there's a difference between income and wages. Phil's income likely comes from shares of the company, not a wage. His income could not skew the average SALARY.
 @scoreboard  @Playanekes Mea culpa.
Â
Because governments all across this nation have chosen the slippery slope of competing with each other for business investment the taxpayer is perennially saddled with corporate welfare. Why not just eliminate corporate taxes period? Companies don't pay taxes anyway. Their customers, the purchasers of their products and services, pay the taxes. The game Kitzhaber and others are playing now create an uneven playing field where some businesses get better tax breaks than others. Least likely to benefit are the small businesses who are responsible for most new job creation. Kitzhaber is failing the public again by not developing a comprehensive strategy that supports all private sector job creation on an equal basis.
What a hypocrite! Not a tax break! Lets cut that pie REALLY THIN! No problem "Gov", those of us who have to work 2 jobs will apparently be more than happy to pick up the "Non-Tax Break". You bozo's will come back with a tax increase on something that the little guy will have to pick up because for "some reason" there isn't enough in the coffers to pay for government services. Wouldn't surprise me if the Gov., and Mark Haas go to work for Nike in the coming years as a nicely paid "Consultant". If a Republican governor did this the Dem's  would be up in arms screaming about the rich getting breaks from their buddies. Poor Poor Nike! Yes there they are, all poor, barely making any money, just hardly getting by. It's not a tax break boys, it's hostage taking at it's finest!
 @yabadabadone the interesting part here is how your anti-Dem screed fits in with the fact that Republicans seem to be backing the proposal. Here, let me clarify:
Â
"House Co-Speaker Bruce Hanna, a Republican, also supports the governor's proposal."
Â
Â
 @Playanekes  @yabadabadone Maybe Yabadabone is not a republican playanekes.... maybe he is just a working stiff that's tired of the BS from any politician... Just sayin.