Buehler, Brown say they're concerned about big money in politics
»Play Video
PORTLAND, Ore. – KATU's political reporter, Patrick Preston, attempted to hash out the campaign cash controversy that has erupted between the two candidates running for Oregon's secretary of state during "Your Voice, Your Vote" Sunday.
What started the ball rolling on the controversy was when incumbent Democrat Kate Brown announced she was limiting her campaign spending in this year's race to $1 million and proposed to her challenger, Republican Knute Buehler, to do the same. He declined. He said, however, that he does support voluntary spending limits but negotiations should happen at the beginning of campaigns.
Both candidates, who were interviewed separately for this week's show, insisted that "big money" is a problem in politics, and both said that they are the most qualified candidate to tackle the issue. In fact, both claimed they've done something to curb its effects.
"When I was in the Legislature, I worked with a coalition of legislators to pass a bill to bring Oregon to a high level of transparency with reporting campaign expenditures and contributions," said Brown. "As a result of my work, we have one of the most transparent systems in the country and Oregonians can follow the money in politics."
"I've gotten big money out of politics in the past, and I would do it again," Buehler said, flatly rejecting the assertion that by declining to accept Brown's million-dollar limit he was diluting his own message of getting big money out of politics. "Twenty years ago ... I led a effort to pass a campaign finance reform in Oregon that completely revamped Oregon's campaign finance laws."
Buehler, a first-time candidate for public office, has been out-raising and out-spending Brown during the campaign, and he called Brown's spending-limit announcement a "political gimmick ... that's coming from a career politician who in 20 years hasn't passed any meaningful campaign spending limits."
Brown countered to charges that she proposed the limit for politically strategic reasons by saying she thought a million dollars "was a reasonable amount to spend in the race for Oregon secretary of state," adding that "I am committed to getting the big money out of politics, and I am the only one who's doing anything about it."
Tracking all that campaign cash and reporting it to the public – in addition to other election-related responsibilities – is part of the secretary of state's job. Other responsibilities of the office include auditing state government and handling business registrations. Additionally, the secretary of state steps in when the governor is no longer able to perform the duties of that office.
Brown, a former legislator, touted her experience and accomplishments in government as evidence that she deserves a second term. She said those accomplishments as secretary of state include the launching of Business Express – a one-stop site for help in starting or expanding a business – and the implementing of online voter registration.
"I'm very passionate about engaging every Oregonian, because I believe that your vote is your voice and every single voice matters," she said.
Buehler, a physician from Bend, said under Brown's leadership the office has "underperformed" and said there is a lot of potential in the state that still needs to be tapped. He also said his experience in the private sector of starting and running businesses has given him a unique perspective of what they need to thrive.
"I may be an outsider to the partisan politics of Salem, but I have a deep insider's knowledge of Oregon and its people," he said.
There was a lot more discussed during the show, click on the "Play Video" button above to watch it in its entirety.
Campaign websites:
I would like Kate to admit the influence of the Communist Party on the Democrat Party.
Just read about Obama's father's papers - quite a little socialist who agreed with the nationalizing of European and Asian" owned businesses in Kenya. In other words, stealing.
Do not vote for the Democrat Party.Â
Â
Yea it is pretty sad that in the USSA politrixters can be bought if you have the dough, they will do your bidding, even make laws designed to parasite off the citizens to make you rich... you only need to offer up a nice bribe.
Notice her focus on "elections". That is her weakest point. Anybody in the know recognizes her as Korrupt Kate (hence her fundraising challenges) and her efforts to limit Dr. Knute Buehler to less than what she spent in her last election, changing election dates and refusing to destroy unused ballots after the election prove she is a crooked partisan party hack! Buehler is better.!
If you're having trouble raising campaign cash - limit what your opponent can raise.
I think it is interesting that Kate Brown did not express any of these concerns before she had a tough opponent, and now that she does his concerns seem to be her concerns. Imagine that!  I don't think Kate Brown has done a bad job but I am reluctant to vote for a copycat.Â
the only politician opposed to big money in politics is the candidate NOT GETTING THE BIG MONEY.
She asked Republican Knute Buehler, to do the same. He declined. He said, that he does support voluntary spending limits but has taken more than $2 million from karl rove already and he Owes him big time..
Â
Totally False Statement by cptmac11
@Lisa McAllister  """""Totally False Statement by cptmac11"""""
Â
You will find that true for the vast majority of  Cptmac11's posts....... the remaining posts just don't make any sense.....
@Lisa McAllister "cptmac11" is a paid liberal troll.
 @cptmac11 Please site your source. I looked at the ORESTAR system which lists all contributions and expenditures and there is nothing to Buehler from Rove or any of his other channels. In fact, it looks like Buehler has received over 1500 donations with the vast majority being small donations from Oregon families. Kate Brown, on the other hand, seems to have donations from major unions and PACs (big money) and out of state contributions... Also looks like she raised and spent almost 1.2mm in 2008 to get the same job she is complaining about Buehler spending more than 1mm on this time around! I smell desperation.
Probably both concerned about big money in politics because they can't get any of it.