Obama, Romney debate spin vs. the facts: The winner?
»Play Video
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama and Republican rival Mitt Romney spun one-sided stories in their first presidential debate, not necessarily bogus, but not the whole truth.
They made some flat-out flubs, too. The rise in health insurance premiums has not been the slowest in 50 years, as Obama stated. Far from it. And there are not 23 million unemployed, as Romney asserted.
Here's a look at some of their claims and how they stack up with the facts:
OBAMA: "I've proposed a specific $4 trillion deficit reduction plan. ... The way we do it is $2.50 for every cut, we ask for $1 in additional revenue."
THE FACTS: In promising $4 trillion, Obama is already banking more than $2 trillion from legislation enacted along with Republicans last year that cut agency operating budgets and capped them for 10 years. He also claims more than $800 billion in war savings that would occur anyway. And he uses creative bookkeeping to hide spending on Medicare reimbursements to doctors. Take those "cuts" away and Obama's $2.50/$1 ratio of spending cuts to tax increases shifts significantly more in the direction of tax increases.
Obama's February budget offered proposals that would cut deficits over the coming decade by $2 trillion instead of $4 trillion. Of that deficit reduction, tax increases accounted for $1.6 trillion. He promises relatively small spending cuts of $597 billion from big federal benefit programs like Medicare and Medicaid. He also proposed higher spending on infrastructure projects.
___
ROMNEY: Obama's health care plan "puts in place an unelected board that's going to tell people ultimately what kind of treatments they can have. I don't like that idea."
THE FACTS: Romney is referring to the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a panel of experts that would have the power to force Medicare cuts if costs rise beyond certain levels and Congress fails to act. But Obama's health care law explicitly prohibits the board from rationing care, shifting costs to retirees, restricting benefits or raising the Medicare eligibility age. So the board doesn't have the power to dictate to doctors what treatments they can prescribe.
Romney seems to be resurrecting the assertion that Obama's law would lead to rationing, made famous by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's widely debunked allegation that it would create "death panels."
The board has yet to be named, and its members would ultimately have to be confirmed by the Senate. Health care inflation has been modest in the last few years, so cuts would be unlikely for most of the rest of this decade.
___
OBAMA: "Over the last two years, health care premiums have gone up — it's true — but they've gone up slower than any time in the last 50 years. So we're already beginning to see progress. In the meantime, folks out there with insurance, you're already getting a rebate."
THE FACTS: Not so, concerning premiums. Obama is mixing overall health care spending, which has been growing at historically low levels, and health insurance premiums, which have continued to rise faster than wages and overall economic growth. Premiums for job-based family coverage have risen by nearly $2,400 since 2009 when Obama took office, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. In 2011, premiums jumped by 9 percent. This year's 4 percent increase was more manageable, but the price tag for family coverage stands at $15,745, with employees paying more than $4,300 of that.
When it comes to insurance rebates under Obama's health care law, less than 10 percent of people with private health insurance are benefiting.
More than 160 million Americans under 65 have private insurance through their jobs and by buying their own policies. According to the administration, about 13 million people will benefit from rebates. And nearly two-thirds of that number will only be entitled to a share of it, since they are covered under job-based plans where their employer pays most of the premium and will get most of the rebate.
___
ROMNEY on the failure of Obama's economic policy: "And the proof of that is 23 million people out of work. The proof of that is 1 out of 6 people in poverty. The proof of that is we've gone from 32 million on food stamps to 47 million on food stamps. The proof of that is that 50 percent of college graduates this year can't find work."
THE FACTS: The number of unemployed is 12.5 million, not 23 million. Romney was also counting 8 million people who are working part time but would like a full-time job and 2.6 million who have stopped looking for work, either because they are discouraged or because they are going back to school or for other reasons.
He got the figure closer to right earlier in the debate, leaving out only the part-timers when he said the U.S. has "23 million people out of work or stopped looking for work." But he was wrong in asserting that Obama came into office "facing 23 million people out of work." At the start of Obama's presidency, 12 million were out of work.
His claim that half of college graduates can't find work now also was problematic. A Northeastern University analysis for The Associated Press found that a quarter of graduates were probably unemployed and another quarter were underemployed, which means working in jobs that didn't make full use of their skills or experience.
___
OBAMA: It's important "that we take some of the money that we're saving as we wind down two wars to rebuild America."
THE FACTS: This oft-repeated claim is based on a fiscal fiction. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were paid for mostly with borrowed money, so stopping them doesn't create a new pool of available cash that can be used for something else, like rebuilding America. It just slows down the government's borrowing.
___
ROMNEY: "At the same time, gasoline prices have doubled under the president. Electric rates are up."
THE FACTS: He's right that the average price has doubled, and a little more, since Obama was sworn in. But presidents have almost no influence on gasoline prices, and certainly not in the near term. Gasoline prices are set on financial exchanges around the world and are based on a host of factors, most importantly the price of crude oil used to make gasoline, the amount of finished gasoline ready to be shipped and the capacity of refiners to make enough to meet market demand.
Retail electricity prices have risen since Obama took office — barely. They've grown by an average of less than 1 percent per year, less than the rate of inflation and slower than the historical growth in electricity prices. The unexpectedly modest rise in electricity prices is because of the plummeting cost of natural gas, which is used to generate electricity.
___
OBAMA: "Gov. Romney's central economic plan calls for a $5 trillion tax cut — on top of the extension of the Bush tax cuts, that's another trillion dollars — and $2 trillion in additional military spending that the military hasn't asked for. That's $8 trillion. How we pay for that, reduce the deficit, and make the investments that we need to make, without dumping those costs onto middle-class Americans, I think is one of the central questions of this campaign."
THE FACTS: Obama's claim that Romney wants to cut taxes by $5 trillion doesn't add up. Presumably, Obama was talking about the effect of Romney's tax plan over 10 years, which is common in Washington. But Obama's math doesn't take into account Romney's entire plan.
Romney proposes to reduce income tax rates by 20 percent and eliminate the estate tax and the alternative minimum tax. The Tax Policy Center, a Washington research group, says that would reduce federal tax revenues by $465 billion in 2015, which would add up to about $5 trillion over 10 years.
However, Romney says he wants to pay for the tax cuts by reducing or eliminating tax credits, deductions and exemptions. The goal is a simpler tax code that raises the same amount of money as the current system but does it in a more efficient manner.
The knock on Romney's plan, which Obama accurately cited, is that Romney has refused to say which tax breaks he would eliminate to pay for the lower rates.
___
ROMNEY: What would I cut from spending? Well, first of all, I will eliminate all programs by this test, if they pass it: Is the program so critical it's worth borrowing money from China to pay for it?
THE FACTS: China continues to be portrayed by Romney and many other Republicans as the poster child for runaway federal deficits. It's true that China is the largest foreign holder of U.S. debt, but it only represents about an 8 percent stake. And China has recently been decreasing its holdings, according to the Treasury Department. Some two-thirds of the $16 trillion national debt is owed to the federal government, with the largest single stake the Federal Reserve, as well as American investors and the Social Security Trust Fund.
___
OBAMA: "Independent studies looking at this said the only way to meet Gov. Romney's pledge of not ... adding to the deficit is by burdening middle-class families. The average middle-class family with children would pay about $2,000 more."
THE FACTS: That's just one scenario. Obama's claim relies on a study by the Tax Policy Center, a Washington research group. The study, however, is more nuanced than Obama indicated.
The study concludes it would be impossible for Romney to meet all of his stated goals without shifting some of the tax burden from people who make more than $200,000 to people who make less.
In one scenario, the study says, Romney's proposal could result in a $2,000 tax increase for families who make less than $200,000 and have children.
Romney says his plan wouldn't raise taxes on anyone, and his campaign points to several studies by conservative think tanks that dispute the Tax Policy Center's findings. Most of the conservative studies argue that Romney's tax plan would stimulate economic growth, generating additional tax revenue without shifting any of the tax burden to the middle class. Congress, however, doesn't use those kinds of projections when it estimates the effect of tax legislation.
___
ROMNEY on cutting the deficit: "Obamacare's on my list. ... I'm going to stop the subsidy to PBS. ... I'll make government more efficient."
THE FACTS: Romney has promised to balance the budget in eight years to 10 years, but he hasn't offered a complete plan. Instead, he's promised a set of principles, some of which — like increasing Pentagon spending and restoring more than $700 billion in cuts that Democrats made in Medicare over the coming decade — work against his goal. He also has said he will not consider tax increases.
He pledges to shrink the government to 20 percent of the size of the economy, as opposed to more than 23 percent of gross domestic product now, by the end of his first term. The Romney campaign estimates that would require cuts of $500 billion from the 2016 budget alone. He also has pledged to cut tax rates by 20 percent, paying for them by eliminating tax breaks for the wealthiest and through economic growth.
To fulfill his promise, then, Romney would require cuts to other programs so deep — under one calculation requiring cutting many areas of the domestic budget by one-third within four years — that they could never get through Congress. Cuts to domestic agencies would have to be particularly deep.
But he's offered only a few modest examples of government programs he'd be willing to squeeze, like subsidies to PBS and Amtrak. He does want to repeal Obama's big health care law, but that law is actually forecast to reduce the deficit.
___
ROMNEY: "Simpson-Bowles, the president should have grabbed that."
OBAMA: "That's what we've done, made some adjustments to it, and we're putting it before Congress right now, a $4 trillion plan."
THE FACTS: At first, the president did largely ignore the recommendations made by his deficit commission headed by Democrat Erskine Bowles and Republican Alan Simpson. He later incorporated some of the proposals, largely the less controversial ones. He did not endorse some of the politically troublesome recommendations, such as trimming popular tax deductions like the one for home mortgage interest.
___
Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Stephen Ohlemacher, Jonathan Fahey, Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Tom Raum and Christopher S. Rugaber contributed to this report.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
My premium for my health insurance has gone up, and I also have to pay more, out of pocket, for medical expenses. Early this year I had to have two CT scans. Guess who had to pay full price for them? Not the insurance company, that's for dang sure. Obamacare is an abomination. It's destroying health care for those who already have it.Â
Even though he is obviously a failure, we progressives must remember that if we don't vote for the darkest skin color, we will be racists.
Â
don't be racist. - Vote based on race!
Â
To all of you racists who don't like Obama's policies, I hope you all die!
Â
I'm a Portland leftist, and I am a champion of tolerance, and I hate you if you disagree.
Â
The government's own data base shows that about 9 million people without jobs have been removed from the labor force simply by the government defining them as not being in the labor force anymore. With the 9 million jobless whom the government has defined out of existence, the true unemployment rate is 19.9% and rising, and not 8.3% and falling. The lemmings have no clue.
wow, if you can read, do please, before you post anything here... again education is the key, and we dont have it here in america
Why don't the Progressives tell the truth more often...BECAUSE NO ONE WOULD VOTE FOR THEM! Obama/Biden..."YES WE DO" WANT TO RAISE YOUR TAXES (AND THE COSTS OF ALL GOODS AND SERVICES SOLD BY SMALL BUSINESSES) BUT...what Progressives never admit, and hope you are too stupid to understand...is that every time you raise taxes (on anyone) they will simply pass the increase in taxes down the food chain (all goods and services) as higher prices...Only those at the bottom and are someone's employees...are unable to pass off the increase in taxes...so much for caring about the poor!
Â
This comment has been deleted
 @wahoo ...guess you aren't looking for a job...probably don't want one either...just keep on taking from others what you are too lazy to work for for yourself...sad...Â
So this is the big one .... Â Â Â Â Right mitt?????
The biggest hostile take over of any business known to man and mitt is going after it....
It's not an office to be held it's a business and the  CEO position to take over...
And like he has done in the past.???
Pay himself and his buds billions...( why does that seem obvious)
Put up the retirement as collateral ( social security medicare)
Walk away and let it go bankrupt ( Isn't that what every republican has done in office??)
Why does he Not care about the 47%?????
He has already dealt with them...
You the rest of you are next...
If he has his way....
Â
Hello!!! Yes bully wins!!! ROBney, the flip flopper, wins for sure, no surprise here in the red neck america!!!! whoever scream the loudest most outrageous lies wins! yoohoo Robney, Robney, Robney! way to go.... we want the top1% to spit on us, we want ENRON and Haliburton! they took ALL OF MY PARENTS HARD EARNED MONEY and put them on the STREET!!!!  YAY!!! Yes, free country for banks to charge over 20% in interest, for privatized schools to make bigger idiots out of our kids, they are alredy down in twenty some position in the world - let's continue 'no child left behind' disaster.
yay, go Robney go!!!! let us lick you *** and make sure that our children drink your oil spill!
idiots.
 @Awesome That was a very lucid and well presented post. You are everything we expect from an Obama supporter. Keep up the good work. Always remember -ask not what you can do for your country, ask what your country can give to you.
Hey Obama, your're so fond of pushing education, you should be happy, cause you just got 'school'd.
Hey, you guys forgot 'the dog ate my homework' and 'gee wally, I kinda guess I really messed things up'.
I was somewhat disappointed that Obama wasn't more aggressive, however, I believe the whole "debate" was poorly controlled. The moderator should have kept speakers to the time he had outlined and not allowed Romney to interrupt at will. Obama will win. But if it is a small margin, stand by. Republicans will try another recount, hanging chads, tactic.
he didnot have his telepromters to save his black ass this time
As a undecided voter, I just do not know. I wish Obama been more proactive. On the other hand, the way Romney talked to us, it was like listening to really bad car saleperson. You could tell he lied alot and copied Obama's views. I was hoping for more from him. Also, Romney seemed frazzled and frantic. I worry about him not being able handle any type of national emergency. So, we shall see-still undecided!!!!
 @seaturtle Excuse me? Were you watching the same debate I was? Sure doesn't seem like it. Romney was polished and Obama was lost, probably because he didn't have his teleprompter.Â
Â
Put down the Kool-Aid and take off the blinders. Go see a doctor about your serious case of myopia.
@seaturtle What debate were u watching? People like you scare me knowing you have a vote yikes
Corporate media is universally giddy over getting their horserace narrative back, but can a shape-shifting, fact-free, Medicare voucherizing, Big Bird killer really win in November with so few undecideds left? Once the media gets off their "aggressive Romney" sugar high maybe they'll ask somebody.
 @noneofyourbizznessBig Bird killer? So you think China backed dollars should continue to pay for OPB? If you are so hot for the bird, why don't you pony up some cash?Â
 @Rae0224  @noneofyourbizzness So you think China backed dollars should continue to pay for OPB? ???????????
Na we are still paying for Rich people who Pay No taxes..
And Big oil to pay No taxes And get subsidies ......
Umm Mam there are 56 million dollars stolen every year for Fake subsidies to fund corruption and you want to point to the $40 dollars a month for big bird????
 @cptmac11  @Rae0224  @noneofyourbizzness "Rich people who Pay No taxes"... you are quite possible the most ignorant person on here.Â
 @Rae0224  @noneofyourbizzness I guess your position is we shouldn't have government.  If your position is you should only pay for those government initiatives/programs you like.  I don't like the war in Afghanistan, so if you want that war, pay for it.  I don't support putting people in jail for drugs, so if you want drug penalties, you pay for them.  There are a number of roads I never use.  I only want to pay for the roads I use.  I could go on, but you get the idea. Â
Â
I do support OPB and give money, but I have no problem with the very small amount of government money that goes there. Â
Â
I think we are all in this together, that there isn't a single program everyone will agree with. Â If you want to look at true free market economics, look to the drug wars in Mexico. Â If that's what you want, there's a lucrative future for you.
 @Rae0224 Then he gives it to you while he is Still alive...
Problem solved
It's the greed of republicans that makes him hold on to it just like your greed to keep it...
Oh and the person in the mirror in the morning they don't hate you they are just wondering what the hell you are thinking...
 @Rae0224  @blotto check with anyone at all who knows anything about government funding.  you can't separate out the money.  check it out yourself.  it hurts america when citizens are misinformed. Â
Â
as to drug abusers, i'm against drug abuse, but it doesn't make sense to me to spend $45k a year plus court costs to warehouse these folks. Â if we have to trim money, i'd rather not spend it on this. Â i'd rather keep big bird.
Â
As to estate tax, the first $5 million is tax exempt. Â After that estates are taxed. how much tax free wealth do you need? Â at what point does a concentration of wealth hurt america?
 @blotto Oh and as far as the drug abusers go. Not sure as to what type of drug abuser you are referring to. But if it were up to me, we would let all the Heroin and meth addicts OD. And, I 100 percent disagree with inheritance taxes. Frankly, since my dad has worked his butt off for 40 years and built a small business form nothing, I surely hope whatever he chooses to leave to his children is his choice. No one is entitled to what he earns, or what I earn and leave to my children. Â
 @blotto When you have to trim the fat, you trim it from multiple places. OPB may get a small amount but when you add it up with all the other programs that get small amounts you create savings.Â
Â
According to Romney he can separate what China pays for, and be it true or not that's enough for me to at least give him a shot at trying.Â
Â
Private donations need to supplement the programs that will have to be cut. Period.Â
 @Rae0224 Since money is fungible, it makes as much sense to say we use money borrowed from China to pay for Afghanistan, war on drugs, roads, etc.  It's not like we use "tax dollars" to pay for war and "China money" to pay for OPB.  China doesn't back OBP, they buy government backed securities.  You can't stop money for programs backed by China; there's no such thing.  Just government backed securities.  Check it out, this is not a liberal position, it's just true.
Â
I kinda agree with you on OPB v. roads. Â But what about OPB v. oil company subsidies? Â OPB v. incarcerating drug abusers? Â OPB v. tax cuts for billionaires? Â OPB v. inheritance tax? Â I am strongly against wasting money. Â I don't think the small amount of government money that goes to OPB is wasted.
Â
Â
 @blotto and you didn't address the fact that we use borrowed money form China to pay for OPB. The people crying about Big Bird may have missed what Romney said about cutting ALL funding to programs backed by China - OPB included.Â
 @blotto  @noneofyourbizzness That is actually not my position. I have no problem with the government giving money to OPB, except for when times are hard. We are clearly at a point when many programs are going to have to be cut and therefore more important  things need to take precedence. I grew up with Big Bird and I love OPB and therefore it is up to the people who watch OPB to step up when the government has to back off. You cant compare public broadcasting to things we need like roads.Â
Obama has no clue about economics or how things really run in this society. He botched it, big time. Let someone else take it over, and clean up your mess, BO.
 @washcomom Yea we didn't have any debt problems in dec 2008 it was all make believe...
So YOUÂ have no clue about economics or how things really run in this society...
Â
Lots of folks are claiming Romney "won" the debate last night because of his aggressiveness. Only problem: Almost everything Romney said was either a flat out lie or a huge contradiction with everything he's said before the debate. Is an endless stream of lies and flip-flops what passes for a "win" in today's world as long as you are aggressive? Here's a list of five big Romney lies from just the first half of the debate: http://www.politicususa.com/mitt-romneys-biggest-lies-presidential-debate.html
 @noneofyourbizzness What channel were you watching last night because that is not how most of america saw it played out. Rommey was a clear winner in round one.
@noneofyourbizzness And we who saw the debate live are going to take the word of a Democratic news site ?? Obama had his butt handed to him , live on all the networks. You bettrer hope he has better answers next time.
 @noneofyourbizzness Next time try supplying a link to a site that's a little less partisan, okay?
 @noneofyourbizzness LOL. I clicked on your link and the title of the page "Politicus USA - Real Liberal Politics. No Corporate Money. No Masters" and a picture of Obama and one of Clinton. You can't be serious while trying to prove your point using a liberal webpage? Good grief. This is the funniest thing I have seen in a while.Â
The real difference between Romney and Obama is...Obama has always made problems throughout his life⦠All his speeches are about anger and distaste about America. Romney has only Ever fixed problems and only Ever loved America. Romney is a hands on man who will be that in the white house..Obama does nothing but play golf, spend 1.5 Billion tax dollars on vacations, talk with hollywood as though anyone cares what they think, give power to radicals in the white house, allow them to run the country while this Obama sits on hollywood guest spots...our country is in danger and this jerk is talking to the view? There are no surprises here...37% of us who know who Obama is....knew he wanted to take this country down, period.
On the other side, you could see Barack Obama committed to big government all the way. Also, we have no new knowledge of what President Obama would do if elected to a second term. We know he opposes everything Romney supports, but we have very little idea about what President Obama himself actually believes in.Â
Â
@KHEB You forgot to drape a flag behind your post with a "Glory, Glory Hallelujah" song.....Actually government shrank under Obama but I know you and facts don't mix.
Â
Robmey cares about campaign donors, just like all the other guys do, don't fool yourself.
Â
People complained about Bush vacations, people complain about Obama vacations, people will complain about the next guy......getting old.
 @deejm2112 Government shrank under Obama?  I think you're forgetting about Obamacare...
@Hellbilly @deejm2112  Yep, and then some! We have way too much government getting into our business! Whatever happened to "less is more"?
The winner of the debate is whomever you wanted to win going in.
Â
#pointless
 @Scorcho You cant be serious? Even the Dems are admitting a loss.Â
 @Rae0224 And those same Dems are still voting Obama anyway.  So my point stands.
 @Scorcho That's funny.  I was with a registered DEM last night watching the debates. He was waiting until the debates and due to Obama's pathetic performance, and Romney's ideas, he is voting against his party. Thankfully!
I am not a huge Romney fan, but I absolutely cannot stomach President Obama, and I thought that Romney was much better at debating than our President was. Besides, Paul Ryan would make a much better president than Joe Biden, should the need arise!
I am eagerly awaiting the debate of #2's, Biden and Ryan. It should be good for a few laughs. Paul Ryan comes off as a geek with muscles, while Biden comes off as a clown with mob connections. Should be a good show.
@agateriver Wondering if Biden, when flustered, will drop a few "f" bombs?
 @Kachina  @agateriver you are making me feel flustered.  Get it?
I watched the debate. Unlike 'randola' I did not see it as a waste of time. What I saw was a sitting President begin to hurl personal attacts when it became clear that he was being overwhelmed.
Â
Make no mistake, this country is at a crisis crossroad. Those who want big goverment and less choice will vote for Obama. Some people will vote for him because he will give them free things. They mistake free things for freedom. Those who wish a responsible government consistant with the Constitution will vote for Romney. They won't get free stuff, but our Embassy's will be safe. Some will mindlessly vote what someone else wants because they were too lazy to watch the debates for themselves and then research the text. Some won't even bother to vote because they simply don't care.
 @agateriver I don't share your political views.  What you say is as insulting as if I were to say that those who support a hostile take over of America by a vulture capitalist so they can give money to foreign corporate stockholders and billionaires will vote for Romey. Â
Â
The point is don't put words in my mouth or assume you know my motivation for voting for Obama. Â You don't!
 @blotto What is your motivation in voting for Obama?Â
 @Rae0224  @blotto Yea could you lie to me again...
 @blotto Well I heard during the debate that Mitt was going to cut taxes for the middle class. Apparently, you missed that part?
 @blotto Exactly. So you don't want Mitt to cut your taxes? Or are you not a part of the middle class? Because, the only thing I can gather is that you believe in entitlements.Â
Briefly, the strength of any society comes from the middle class.