Obama has long work list to tackle when he returns

WASHINGTON (AP) - It's hardly a secret that Barack Obama, like every president no doubt, muses about his ultimate legacy and spot in the presidential pantheon. He approaches his second term confronting tough and shifting challenges that will play big roles in shaping the rest of his presidency and his eventual place in history.
In the coming months, Obama will have to decide where to be ambitious, where to be cautious, and where to buy time.
He draws political strength from his surprisingly easy re-election in a bad economy. It's partly offset, however, by Republicans' continued control of the House, plus their filibuster powers in the Senate.
Some of the big issues awaiting the president's decisions are familiar, long-simmering problems. They include immigration and the need for a tenable balance between taxes, spending and borrowing.
Another issue, gun control, jumped to the national agenda's top tier this month following the massacre of first-graders and teachers in a Connecticut school. And the issue of climate change remains unresolved.
Veteran politicians and presidential historians say it's almost impossible for Obama to "go big" on all these issues. Indeed, it might prove difficult to go big on even one. While some counsel caution, others urge the president to be as bold and ambitious as possible.
"Americans are yearning for leadership," said Gil Troy, a presidential scholar at McGill University.
As a president dealing with policy, he said, Obama has generally failed to give "that visionary, powerful address that we came to know and love and expect in the 2008 campaign."
Rather than let Congress take the lead on big issues, as it did in drafting the 2009 health care overhaul, Obama should be more forceful in pushing new legislation or using his executive powers to bypass Congress where possible, Troy said.
"The gun control issue is a major opportunity for Obama to make his mark on history -- and solve a problem that has frustrated Democrats for decades," he added.
Other presidential historians, however, think Obama is severely constrained by political realities. They say he will have to carefully pick and choose which goals to emphasize in his second four years.
"I see Obama as almost uniquely handcuffed by circumstances," said John Baick of Western New England University. The number of big, unresolved problems facing the nation, coupled with a deeply divided public and Congress, he said, leave Obama with fewer viable options than most presidents have enjoyed.
At best, Baick said, the U.S. government "is a gigantic cruise liner, and the most he can do is keep us from hitting ice bergs."
For instance, Baick said, "if he goes big on gun control, then it's 1994 all over again."
Then-President Bill Clinton pushed an assault weapons ban through the Democratic-led Congress that year, prompting fierce pushback from gun-rights groups. Clinton later would credit the NRA with shifting the House majority to the GOP for the first time in 40 years. However, other factors -- including a House bank scandal -- played big roles, too.
Paul Rego, a political scientist at Messiah College in Grantham, Penn., largely agrees with Baick.
"While President Obama does not face the same cataclysmic events that Abraham Lincoln faced, or that FDR encountered in the form of the Great Depression and World War II, his challenges are many and significant," Rego said in an email.
He said Obama "faces a hurdle that neither Lincoln nor Roosevelt had to overcome during the tumultuous years of their respective presidencies: divided government." Today's Democrats and Republicans differ so sharply about government's proper role, Rego said. He said that Obama's job "is actually harder than that of his most illustrious predecessors."
Politicians of all stripes say Obama's first priority is to resolve the deep partisan divide over tax-and-spending issues, exemplified by repeated impasses over two years that led to this week's showdown on the "fiscal cliff."
An even higher-risk conflict may arise in a few months. Congress again must either raise the federal debt ceiling or see the government default on its loans.
Beyond that, lawmakers and interest groups are watching for signs of how hard Obama might push to restrict firearms and expand illegal immigrants' rights.
Obama said last Wednesday that gun control will be a central issue in his second term. "I will use all the powers of this office to help advance efforts aimed at preventing more tragedies like this," he said of the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass killings.
The president named an interagency task force to recommend anti-violence legislation within weeks. The strategy gives him room to distance himself somewhat from its recommendations if he wants, even though he named Vice President Joe Biden to chair the panel.
Americans' affinity for firearms runs deep, and many political activists think Obama could have more sweeping success with immigration changes.
He won a big majority of Hispanics' votes in both his elections. The trend alarms Republican strategists, who fear their party won't win another presidential election until it repairs its bad relations with Latinos.
With Democrats and Republicans increasingly aware of Hispanics' growing political clout, "this might be an historic opportunity," Troy said.
Chris Dolan, a political scientist at Lebanon Valley College in Pennsylvania, agrees. He said he expects Obama to be "incredibly ambitious on comprehensive immigration reform."
The effort, Dolan said, could "build a lasting Democratic support group. You can't do that with gun control."
Still, opposition to granting citizenship to illegal immigrants runs deep in many circles, especially the Republican Party's base. Bids for "comprehensive immigration reform" have gone nowhere in Congress in recent years.
Several advocacy groups want Obama to make the most of his executive powers to enact measures that don't require congressional action.
The Migration Policy Institute earlier this year made several suggestions regarding immigrants. They included "establishing uniform enforcement priorities," defining "what constitutes effective border control," and "allowing applicants for immigrant visas to file in the United States."
Now that Obama has won re-election, however, the advocacy group wants him instead to push a broader agenda through Congress.
"With the issue teed up for possible action," said Doris Meissner, a former commissioner at the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, antagonizing congressional Republicans with executive actions "would not be politically smart."
The political climate for sweeping immigration changes "is significantly better," Meissner said, "but that does not mean it will happen."
Even with a full plate of challenges and a hostile party controlling the House, she said, "I think Obama absolutely has to go big on immigration."
The White House has declined to detail the president's plans for a second-term agenda. Once the deficit-spending problems known as the "fiscal cliff" are addressed, said White House spokeswoman Jamie Smith, "President Obama looks forward to working on a number of issues that are critical to our future, from immigration to energy, to education and national security direction."
In the coming months, Obama will have to decide where to be ambitious, where to be cautious, and where to buy time.
He draws political strength from his surprisingly easy re-election in a bad economy. It's partly offset, however, by Republicans' continued control of the House, plus their filibuster powers in the Senate.
Some of the big issues awaiting the president's decisions are familiar, long-simmering problems. They include immigration and the need for a tenable balance between taxes, spending and borrowing.
Another issue, gun control, jumped to the national agenda's top tier this month following the massacre of first-graders and teachers in a Connecticut school. And the issue of climate change remains unresolved.
Veteran politicians and presidential historians say it's almost impossible for Obama to "go big" on all these issues. Indeed, it might prove difficult to go big on even one. While some counsel caution, others urge the president to be as bold and ambitious as possible.
"Americans are yearning for leadership," said Gil Troy, a presidential scholar at McGill University.
As a president dealing with policy, he said, Obama has generally failed to give "that visionary, powerful address that we came to know and love and expect in the 2008 campaign."
Rather than let Congress take the lead on big issues, as it did in drafting the 2009 health care overhaul, Obama should be more forceful in pushing new legislation or using his executive powers to bypass Congress where possible, Troy said.
"The gun control issue is a major opportunity for Obama to make his mark on history -- and solve a problem that has frustrated Democrats for decades," he added.
Other presidential historians, however, think Obama is severely constrained by political realities. They say he will have to carefully pick and choose which goals to emphasize in his second four years.
"I see Obama as almost uniquely handcuffed by circumstances," said John Baick of Western New England University. The number of big, unresolved problems facing the nation, coupled with a deeply divided public and Congress, he said, leave Obama with fewer viable options than most presidents have enjoyed.
At best, Baick said, the U.S. government "is a gigantic cruise liner, and the most he can do is keep us from hitting ice bergs."
For instance, Baick said, "if he goes big on gun control, then it's 1994 all over again."
Then-President Bill Clinton pushed an assault weapons ban through the Democratic-led Congress that year, prompting fierce pushback from gun-rights groups. Clinton later would credit the NRA with shifting the House majority to the GOP for the first time in 40 years. However, other factors -- including a House bank scandal -- played big roles, too.
Paul Rego, a political scientist at Messiah College in Grantham, Penn., largely agrees with Baick.
"While President Obama does not face the same cataclysmic events that Abraham Lincoln faced, or that FDR encountered in the form of the Great Depression and World War II, his challenges are many and significant," Rego said in an email.
He said Obama "faces a hurdle that neither Lincoln nor Roosevelt had to overcome during the tumultuous years of their respective presidencies: divided government." Today's Democrats and Republicans differ so sharply about government's proper role, Rego said. He said that Obama's job "is actually harder than that of his most illustrious predecessors."
Politicians of all stripes say Obama's first priority is to resolve the deep partisan divide over tax-and-spending issues, exemplified by repeated impasses over two years that led to this week's showdown on the "fiscal cliff."
An even higher-risk conflict may arise in a few months. Congress again must either raise the federal debt ceiling or see the government default on its loans.
Beyond that, lawmakers and interest groups are watching for signs of how hard Obama might push to restrict firearms and expand illegal immigrants' rights.
Obama said last Wednesday that gun control will be a central issue in his second term. "I will use all the powers of this office to help advance efforts aimed at preventing more tragedies like this," he said of the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass killings.
The president named an interagency task force to recommend anti-violence legislation within weeks. The strategy gives him room to distance himself somewhat from its recommendations if he wants, even though he named Vice President Joe Biden to chair the panel.
Americans' affinity for firearms runs deep, and many political activists think Obama could have more sweeping success with immigration changes.
He won a big majority of Hispanics' votes in both his elections. The trend alarms Republican strategists, who fear their party won't win another presidential election until it repairs its bad relations with Latinos.
With Democrats and Republicans increasingly aware of Hispanics' growing political clout, "this might be an historic opportunity," Troy said.
Chris Dolan, a political scientist at Lebanon Valley College in Pennsylvania, agrees. He said he expects Obama to be "incredibly ambitious on comprehensive immigration reform."
The effort, Dolan said, could "build a lasting Democratic support group. You can't do that with gun control."
Still, opposition to granting citizenship to illegal immigrants runs deep in many circles, especially the Republican Party's base. Bids for "comprehensive immigration reform" have gone nowhere in Congress in recent years.
Several advocacy groups want Obama to make the most of his executive powers to enact measures that don't require congressional action.
The Migration Policy Institute earlier this year made several suggestions regarding immigrants. They included "establishing uniform enforcement priorities," defining "what constitutes effective border control," and "allowing applicants for immigrant visas to file in the United States."
Now that Obama has won re-election, however, the advocacy group wants him instead to push a broader agenda through Congress.
"With the issue teed up for possible action," said Doris Meissner, a former commissioner at the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, antagonizing congressional Republicans with executive actions "would not be politically smart."
The political climate for sweeping immigration changes "is significantly better," Meissner said, "but that does not mean it will happen."
Even with a full plate of challenges and a hostile party controlling the House, she said, "I think Obama absolutely has to go big on immigration."
The White House has declined to detail the president's plans for a second-term agenda. Once the deficit-spending problems known as the "fiscal cliff" are addressed, said White House spokeswoman Jamie Smith, "President Obama looks forward to working on a number of issues that are critical to our future, from immigration to energy, to education and national security direction."
(Princess Bride quote)
Tyrone, you know how much I love watching you work, but I've got my country's 500th anniversary to plan, my wedding to arrange, my wife to murder and Guilder to frame for it; I'm swamped.Â
Â
O's got a lot to do, that's furshure. Â A Country to push over the financial cliff, cement ever increasing control over the lives of his constituents, trillions to squander and the Republicans to blame for it!
Anyone who believes the words that come out of B HO's mouth is a complete fool.Â
just a couple examples
Â
the words from his mouth make perfect sense....... but is the complete opposite of his actions
Â
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ziiZFcWChg
Â
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft9oyp4IEUU
Â
BTW, Senator B HO voted NOT to raise the debt limit in 2006. he DID NOT bother voting in 2007 or 2008
Hopefully it's a resignation letter.
We can only hope that this fraud can't get any of it done!
@Freedom1267 The election is over. Get in line, behind our country and our President.
This comment has been deleted
 @Fed up Fed  Are you that stupid?
Never mind! You already answered that!
He should have stayed tackling footballs at the university in Kenya, am I right?
This comment has been deleted
 @Fed up Fed   """""I LOVE the majority minority posters on this site. President Obama won reelection, but you'd never know it from the sad stupid wingnuts who post here. Merry Christmas, wingnuts! America rejected you and your ignorant hatred AGAIN!"""""
Â
typical lefty...... it is impossible to have just an honest disagreement with them...... disagreeing with them means you are either  racist,  homophobic, stupid and/or full of hate.Â
However,  F' up  is just one to demonstrate there is more hate on the left than the right....
Â
""""""America rejected you and your ignorant hatred AGAIN!"""""
B HO got 51% of the vote...... not exactly a huge margin Â
Hard to compete with B HO buying  votes from the low information/FSA  (FreeStuffArmy) voters.
Â
I read where it wasn't the 47% comment that sunk Romney.  I  read it was his quote that he wanted to put EVERY American back to work  is what sunk him....  :)
This comment has been deleted
@kramr 2010 was a mid term election with many driven to the polls because of fear mongering on the right of healthcare reform, gays and a black president. There explained, now explain 2012.Â
@Fed up Fed   with your twisted spin..... explain 2010
 @Fed up Fed  @kramr  """""" (and you don't have to keep calling him BHO;"""""
I'm not calling him any sort of name...... those are his initials Einstein....
""""Â rampant bigotry"""" Â such as????
"""""So, from the bottom of my heart, I want to thank you for your ignorance, your uncompromising stupidity, and your outdated, outmoded, impractical view of the world. Please do keep up the hatred. Thanks."""""
Â
You my friend need to look in the mirror when making these kinds of statements....  It seems impossible for you to make a post without insults, hate  and a condescending  tone.  you have by YOUR OWN ACTIONS demonstrated your hate Â
Â
BTW,  I expect 2014 will be another 2010 when the D's got  their worst defeat in nearly eighty years.Â
 @Fed up Fed Obama stole the election with his North Korean friends.
 @Fed up Fed Spoken like a truly enlightened, open-minded progressive. So, anyone who disagrees with your brilliant and poignant observations is a wingnut?. And what a loving way to decry hatred! You mindless liberals are truly the most clueless, hateful and intolerant people on the planet. You people are your own worst enemies.
This comment has been deleted
@Fed up Fed ... you sound liker one angry young man...may the new year bring you peace and harmony...hope you aren't one of the dangerous ones.
This comment has been deleted
@Fed up Fed ....
You are the epitome of what is wrong in this country....respect, discipline, work ethic, teamwork, and above all love of God and Country.. is something you obviously have never learner nor been exposed to....
Illegal immigrants should have NO rights!
....if he returns!
The White House has declined to detail the president's plans for a second-term agenda. You know why? Because if the people found out what his plans really were, obozo would be impeached.
 @theobserver We'll all be speaking Korean soon.
 @PDXguy23  @theobserver Na..... I'd say Mandarin or Spanish  before anything else.Â
 Messiah College in Grantham, Penn. How novel. obozo already has a college named after him. Go figure.
"Rather than let Congress take the lead on big issues, as it did in drafting the 2009 health care overhaul, Obama should be more forceful in pushing new legislation or using his executive powers to bypass Congress where possible, Troy said." Â Â (from the story)
Â
Wish they wouldn't encourage him (Obama)... I sometimes get the feeling that our illustrious leader would just as soon do away with Congress altogether... it would make implementing his own agenda soooo much easier...
""""""""Americans are yearning for leadership," said Gil Troy, a presidential scholar at McGill University.""""""
Â
If thats the case, they really blew it last month......
 @kramr I'll have to agree with you on this one.
"""""""Obama has long work list to tackle when he returns""""""
Â
Sadly Bronco Bamma possesses no leadership skills  to get any of the work accomplished....... as proven by his failure last year and so far this year.Â
@kramr Once again you can't even try to make a point with out grade school name calling.