Report: Tax bills for rich families approach 30-year high

WASHINGTON (AP) - The poor rich.
With Washington gridlocked again over whether to raise their taxes, it turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historically low rates.
President Barack Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress say the wealthy must pay their fair share if the federal government is ever going to fix its finances and reduce the budget deficit to a manageable level.
A new analysis, however, shows that average tax bills for high-income families rarely have been higher since the Congressional Budget Office began tracking the data in 1979. It's middle- and low-income families that aren't paying as much as they used to.
For 2013, families with incomes in the top 20 percent of the nation will pay an average of 27.2 percent of their income in federal taxes, according to projections by the Tax Policy Center, a research organization based in Washington. The top 1 percent of households, those with incomes averaging $1.4 million, will pay an average of 35.5 percent.
Those tax rates, which include income, payroll, corporate and estate taxes, are among the highest since 1979.
The average family in the bottom 20 percent of households won't pay any federal taxes. Instead, many families in this group will get payments from the federal government by claiming more in credits than they owe in taxes, including payroll taxes. That will give them a negative tax rate.
"My sense is that high-income people feel abused by being targeted always for more taxes," said Roberton Williams, a fellow at the Tax Policy Center. "You can understand why they feel that way."
Last week, Senate Democrats were unable to advance their proposal to raise taxes on some wealthy families for the second time this year as part of a package to avoid automatic spending cuts. The bill failed Thursday when Republicans blocked it. A competing Republican bill that included no tax increases also failed, and the automatic spending cuts began taking effect Friday.
The issue, however, isn't going away.
Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress insist that any future deal to reduce government borrowing must include a mix of spending cuts and more tax revenue.
"I am prepared to do hard things and to push my Democratic friends to do hard things," Obama said Friday. "But what I can't do is ask middle-class families, ask seniors, ask students to bear the entire burden of deficit reduction when we know we've got a bunch of tax loopholes that are benefiting the well-off and the well-connected, aren't contributing to growth, aren't contributing to our economy. It's not fair. It's not right."
The Democrats' bill included the "Buffett Rule," named after billionaire investor Warren Buffett. It gradually would phase in a requirement that people making more than $1 million a year pay at least 30 percent of their income in federal taxes.
The rule targets millionaires who make most of their money from investments - capital gains and qualified dividends, which have a top tax rate of 20 percent.
"It's fairness," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. "We're not raising taxes with the Buffett rule as much as we are correcting an inequity in terms of, one guy can be working at one end of the hall and because he's working with hedge funds, he gets taxed at 20 percent. Another guy at the other end of the hall is on a salary at an insurance company and he has to pay (39.6 percent). That's just not fair."
On average, households making more than $1 million this year will pay 37.2 percent of their income in federal taxes, according to the Tax Policy Center. But there are exceptions.
For example, the Internal Revenue Service tracks tax returns for the 400 highest-paid filers each year. Those taxpayers made an average of $202 million in 2009, the latest year available. Their average federal income tax rate: 19.9 percent.
That's still higher than the tax rate paid by most middle-income families, but not by much.
The middle 20 percent of U.S. households - those making an average of $46,600 - will pay an average of 13.8 percent of their income in federal taxes for this year, according to the Tax Policy Center. Over the past three decades, the average federal tax rate for this group has been about 16 percent.
The Associated Press analyzed two sets of data to compare tax burdens over time.
The CBO produces data from 1979 to 2009; the center has overlapping data from 2004 through 2013. Both get tax data from the IRS, but they use slightly different methodologies to calculate federal tax burdens.
Still, their numbers track closely enough to make some general observations. For example, it is clear that for 2013, average tax bills for the wealthy will be among the highest since 1979. It also is clear that federal taxes for middle- and low-income households will stay well below their averages for the same period.
Liberals and many Democrats say rich families can afford to pay higher taxes because their incomes have grown much more than incomes for middle- and low-income families.
Average after-tax incomes for the top 1 percent of households more than doubled from 1979 to 2009, increasing by 155 percent, according to the CBO. Average incomes for those in the middle increased by just 32 percent during the same period while those at the bottom saw their incomes go up by 45 percent.
"You've got to think about the context," said Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. "We just had three decades in the United States where we had a tremendous increase in inequality."
The growing disparity in income is a big reason why tax bills for the rich are approaching 30-year highs, Williams said. As the rich get richer, a greater share of their income is taxed at the top rate, he said.
High-income families also have been targeted by tax increases this year, including a new tax law passed by Congress on Jan. 1 as well as tax increases in the president's health care law.
The new tax law made the federal income tax more progressive, increasing the top tax rate from 35 percent to 39.6 percent, on taxable income above $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for married couples filing jointly. Lower tax rates on income below those amounts were made permanent. Also, tax breaks for low-income families first enacted as part of Obama's 2009 stimulus package were extended through 2017.
Conservatives say raising taxes again on the wealthy would reduce their incentive to save and invest, hurting long-term economic growth.
"Raising taxes hurts the economy, and raising taxes on upper-income individuals - whether those who work for salaries or those who save and earn capital income - always hurts the economy the most," said J.D. Foster, a fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "Spite and envy are not sound bases for public policy."
Besides, Republican leaders in Congress say, one tax increase a year is more than enough.
"Let's make it clear that the president got his tax hikes on Jan. 1," House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Friday. "This discussion about revenue, in my view, is over."
With Washington gridlocked again over whether to raise their taxes, it turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historically low rates.
President Barack Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress say the wealthy must pay their fair share if the federal government is ever going to fix its finances and reduce the budget deficit to a manageable level.
A new analysis, however, shows that average tax bills for high-income families rarely have been higher since the Congressional Budget Office began tracking the data in 1979. It's middle- and low-income families that aren't paying as much as they used to.
For 2013, families with incomes in the top 20 percent of the nation will pay an average of 27.2 percent of their income in federal taxes, according to projections by the Tax Policy Center, a research organization based in Washington. The top 1 percent of households, those with incomes averaging $1.4 million, will pay an average of 35.5 percent.
Those tax rates, which include income, payroll, corporate and estate taxes, are among the highest since 1979.
The average family in the bottom 20 percent of households won't pay any federal taxes. Instead, many families in this group will get payments from the federal government by claiming more in credits than they owe in taxes, including payroll taxes. That will give them a negative tax rate.
"My sense is that high-income people feel abused by being targeted always for more taxes," said Roberton Williams, a fellow at the Tax Policy Center. "You can understand why they feel that way."
Last week, Senate Democrats were unable to advance their proposal to raise taxes on some wealthy families for the second time this year as part of a package to avoid automatic spending cuts. The bill failed Thursday when Republicans blocked it. A competing Republican bill that included no tax increases also failed, and the automatic spending cuts began taking effect Friday.
The issue, however, isn't going away.
Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress insist that any future deal to reduce government borrowing must include a mix of spending cuts and more tax revenue.
"I am prepared to do hard things and to push my Democratic friends to do hard things," Obama said Friday. "But what I can't do is ask middle-class families, ask seniors, ask students to bear the entire burden of deficit reduction when we know we've got a bunch of tax loopholes that are benefiting the well-off and the well-connected, aren't contributing to growth, aren't contributing to our economy. It's not fair. It's not right."
The Democrats' bill included the "Buffett Rule," named after billionaire investor Warren Buffett. It gradually would phase in a requirement that people making more than $1 million a year pay at least 30 percent of their income in federal taxes.
The rule targets millionaires who make most of their money from investments - capital gains and qualified dividends, which have a top tax rate of 20 percent.
"It's fairness," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. "We're not raising taxes with the Buffett rule as much as we are correcting an inequity in terms of, one guy can be working at one end of the hall and because he's working with hedge funds, he gets taxed at 20 percent. Another guy at the other end of the hall is on a salary at an insurance company and he has to pay (39.6 percent). That's just not fair."
On average, households making more than $1 million this year will pay 37.2 percent of their income in federal taxes, according to the Tax Policy Center. But there are exceptions.
For example, the Internal Revenue Service tracks tax returns for the 400 highest-paid filers each year. Those taxpayers made an average of $202 million in 2009, the latest year available. Their average federal income tax rate: 19.9 percent.
That's still higher than the tax rate paid by most middle-income families, but not by much.
The middle 20 percent of U.S. households - those making an average of $46,600 - will pay an average of 13.8 percent of their income in federal taxes for this year, according to the Tax Policy Center. Over the past three decades, the average federal tax rate for this group has been about 16 percent.
The Associated Press analyzed two sets of data to compare tax burdens over time.
The CBO produces data from 1979 to 2009; the center has overlapping data from 2004 through 2013. Both get tax data from the IRS, but they use slightly different methodologies to calculate federal tax burdens.
Still, their numbers track closely enough to make some general observations. For example, it is clear that for 2013, average tax bills for the wealthy will be among the highest since 1979. It also is clear that federal taxes for middle- and low-income households will stay well below their averages for the same period.
Liberals and many Democrats say rich families can afford to pay higher taxes because their incomes have grown much more than incomes for middle- and low-income families.
Average after-tax incomes for the top 1 percent of households more than doubled from 1979 to 2009, increasing by 155 percent, according to the CBO. Average incomes for those in the middle increased by just 32 percent during the same period while those at the bottom saw their incomes go up by 45 percent.
"You've got to think about the context," said Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. "We just had three decades in the United States where we had a tremendous increase in inequality."
The growing disparity in income is a big reason why tax bills for the rich are approaching 30-year highs, Williams said. As the rich get richer, a greater share of their income is taxed at the top rate, he said.
High-income families also have been targeted by tax increases this year, including a new tax law passed by Congress on Jan. 1 as well as tax increases in the president's health care law.
The new tax law made the federal income tax more progressive, increasing the top tax rate from 35 percent to 39.6 percent, on taxable income above $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for married couples filing jointly. Lower tax rates on income below those amounts were made permanent. Also, tax breaks for low-income families first enacted as part of Obama's 2009 stimulus package were extended through 2017.
Conservatives say raising taxes again on the wealthy would reduce their incentive to save and invest, hurting long-term economic growth.
"Raising taxes hurts the economy, and raising taxes on upper-income individuals - whether those who work for salaries or those who save and earn capital income - always hurts the economy the most," said J.D. Foster, a fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "Spite and envy are not sound bases for public policy."
Besides, Republican leaders in Congress say, one tax increase a year is more than enough.
"Let's make it clear that the president got his tax hikes on Jan. 1," House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Friday. "This discussion about revenue, in my view, is over."
We have all been exposed to fear mongering on issue after issue from the Obama Administration. However, their words have become far worse than mere fear mongering.....they are outright lies. I'm not sure what disturbs me more, the fact that Obama lies so frequently or the fact that he lies so easily.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/three-obama-adminstration-sequester-talking-points-that-were
I don't understand where these bozos are getting their numbers from. Â Maybe they can explain to me why I just paid 24% in taxes being in the middle class category? Â Where does this bullstuff come from?
Lets not forget those good 'ol charts, some on here apparently don't or can't read. Probably why they're still defending those poor rich people !!!
http://www.businessinsider.com/15-charts-about-wealth-and-inequality-in-america-2010-4?op=1
Oh and for those that think the wealthy are paying more in taxes !! Tax brackets don't lie !
http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/history-of-federal-individual-1.html
@sargerator --- if you think only the rich will end up paying more taxes you have another thing coming.Â
It's sure easy tax the other guys, demonize the rich, make them pay more. Unfortunately we all will end up paying more.Â
The government is a monster that will never be satisfied.
I can't believe how many people don't want the very rich to pay their fair share of taxes.  Especially when they could care less about the middle class.  The key word in this flaming Fox-news type piece is "approach". Ronald Reagan had the rich paying more than they are paying now.  This fails to say that that was the last time they paid their equitable share.  And remember to include the loopholes that allow them to get paid with dividends, etc.  If you weren't paying attention during the last election, Romney probably paid much less than you did for the millions he was getting from dividends.  The oil companies paid less than you did.  Wake up.  Quit being patsies for the rich. We  (the middle class) have carried the country on our backs long enough. Â
Read an article from someone who did some homework instead of picking and choosing random information to get the answer they wanted. Â Just remember who owns the news media.Â
http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/plank/107819/yes-virginia-the-rich-pay-less-tax-now#
@TJC I can't believe how many people don't understand that the very rich already pay way more than their fair share of taxes.Â
Obama won't be happy until he has reduced every hard working man/woman down to the level of the occupiers, until only the government has the money, power, privilege....
Really, show us where thats happening, come on ! You do know romney didn't show his tax returns for 2002 thru 2010 right ? And does it make you wonder why maccaine turned him down as a vice candidate in 2004 AFTER romney showed him his tax returns. Do you remember romneys SINGLE year tax return he showed us where he only payed 13.9 % ? Explain how this douchbag can make hundreds of millions, destroy companies , ship jobs over seas AND pay the same tax rate as me ?? Where in your upside down world does that make semse !
@sargerator Ahhh class envy... gotta love it.
And please notice they have only been tracking this since 1979...Reagan was elected in 1980 and enacted a huge tax reform significantly lowering the taxes on the wealthy...as Warren Buffet freely writes, they have been lowering taxes for the wealthy all of his life and his effective tax rates have never been lower...Â
You guys have seen this right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsMÂ
This is a neat little viral video about wealth distribution in the US with sources. It's not hard people, you've been duped into feeling bad for the ultra wealthy who have been sticking it to you for decades. Don't worry, you MIGHT be able to afford a new flat screen TV to keep you happy.Â
Good video, but those on the right will somehow claim it's "liberal bias" bunch-o-nutz ! Ya, those on here that defend the uber wealthy just have no clue. Of course they watch fauxe nooze and then claim msnbc is liberal media ?? I match their fauxe, huckabee, palin, gingrich, rove, bolton and brown all ex republicon lawmakers or candidates to msnbc's scarborough, you know, morning joe but wait, he is an ex republicon lawmaker...so much for that liberal media.
It is amazing how Oboma is always running out of tax dollars but can give so much away to foreign governments! If he would quit giving it away we would have plenty of tax dollars for America! The Democrats just haven't learn that you can't buy friends.
You do realize obama doesn't handle the us bank account, congress does...right ?
The "rich" have always paid their "fair share." But that could never be in eyes of a liberal democrat. Even a "rich" one.
Karl Marx - "So long as other classes continue to exist, the capitalist class in particular, the proletariat fights it"Â
"it is really taking a good joke to [sic] far to suggest it is damaging to the body politic for members of society to look at the differences in income and take action to redistribute in their direction " - Rick Bookstaber serves on President Obamaâs Financial Stability Oversight Council
For the visual learners out there, the cover of this CBO report sums up the situation nicely, http://cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/43373-06-11-HouseholdIncomeandFedTaxes.pdf
If the red bar is shorter than the blue bar you are not paying your fair share and are being subsidized by someone else.
If the red bar is taller than the blue bar, then you are paying greater than your fair share and subsidizing those who aren't.
This comment has been deleted
@feral There is an ocean between us and Mexico?
This comment has been deleted
@feral @TreeWizard What double speak?
@feral @TreeWizard Exactly + Exactly - Fuzzy = Mexico is a threat.Â
@feral @TreeWizard You act like the CIA is not laundering money from Wells Fargo to traffic illegal drugs into this country. Who said Mexico was a threat?
"The average family in the bottom 20 percent of households won't pay any federal taxes. Instead, many families in this group will get payments from the federal government by claiming more in credits than they owe in taxes, including payroll taxes. That will give them a negative tax rate."
It appears that these folks are not paying their fair share. Funny that the Democrats don't talk about that issue.
This comment has been deleted
Ya 'ol ralph ain't playing with a full deck if you know what I mean !
lets all say stuff like "we got a spending problem" but then cry like little girls when we have to pay more for health care (unless you are an obama phony)  and lets whine when they even consider changing soc sec and medicare.   HAHAHAHHA doom cometh
i aint rich, so i really dont give a rats. what DO i care about? well thats easy,  my own personal financial situation.  just like yall!   there is NO fix and we will collapse in march of 2014 . Â
What a load of crap. The top 20% are the rich? And the top 1% will pay 35.5%? Right. Last year, Willard had to turn down deductions in order to avoid paying only 12%. The fiscal cliff deal didn't stick it to him that hard.
Wealth in this country is so concentrated at the top, that the 1% isn't interesting. You need to talk about the 0.1% to get to the crux of the matter.
@Max Quinn like Al Gore's multi million dollar deal put through on the last day of the year to avoid paying higher taxes?
Taxes are only a part of the equation. Currently, the largest part of the equation is spending. Regardless of who is paying the taxes, spending is far greater.
If we spend less, we need to tax less, or at least use our taxes to actually make things better.
Leave it to a right winger to try to change the issue from tax rates of the rich to cutting spending...they are why nothing gets done in Washington...
@Jack Smith Sorry Jack but you do not know me. Please keep your mean little lables to yourself.
@agateriver@Jack SmithWell said. It's hard to explain that to Portland leftists though.
I did not complain, I just pointed out a common tactic that you were employing...and the article is about tax rates....although some are making it about spending...
@Jack Smith Not at all Jack, taxation and spending are inseperable in this debate. You don't seem to like that, and you have good company. Harry Ried agrees with you, and he is part of the machine that has failed to do it's job.
By the way, I labled nothing, you did. You labled me sight unseen. You threw a stone and complained when the victim (me)Â reacted negatively.
@Jack Smith lol. That will be your little secret.   Â
I know someone trying to change the discussion away from the low tax rates of the rich when I hear one....label it whatever you want...
I would bet the Tax Policy Center is a right wing funded group that is not truly independent and most likely funded by the q1% and therefore I do not trust anything they have to say....even Warren Buffet says they have been reducing his tax rates for his whole adult life...
@Jack Smith "The Tax Policy Center is a joint venture of the @Jack Smith and Brookings Institution. The Center is made up of nationally recognized experts in tax, budget, and social policy who have served at the highest levels of government." "n 2002, tax experts who had served in the Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton administrations established the Tax Policy Center to provide unbiased analysis of tax issues."
Yeah, and even the author of Reagan's tax cut plan has since come out and very publicly said it was a huge mistake...So maybe they don't know how to analyze taxes and tax issues...
HA ! 'ol bj was a repubulicon lite, everyone knows that !
@TreeWizard I would do the same.........if I was that arrogant of actual facts.
@Jeepers I like how he focused on Reagans and ignored the fact there are others including Bill Clintons.
@Jack Smith I'm guessing they can do better than you. Oh well, off to your 99 percenter clan rally, do us all a favor and keep accomplishing nothing!
So the wealthy , the 2 %er's, wealth has risen by 150 plus % since 1979. The middle class has risen 30 % .
So whats the problem here ?? I don't get it, the wealthy are acquiring more of the wealth so they pay more percentage of taxes. Is that a problem ??
Lets stop with, "the poor wealthy" crap ! It doesn't hurt them to pay...yes..."their fair share", they don't have to skip that doc appointment for their kid, they don't have to choose what bills to pay this month. They have the option to choose to go this weekend to their south of france house or caribbean house...poor rich people !
@sargerator Why is it that you think the wealthy should pay a higher percentage than anyone else?  How does that lend itself to capitalism?  The more we make, the more we have to subsidize everyone else?  How does that motivate someone to want to become wealthy?  Just wondering..... How can we justify the lower income people paying nothing?  They should still have to pay a percentage.  I am pretty sick of paying 28% while they sit and suck up benefits and do nothing.  WTH is wrong with this picture?
I think you are missing a 0...I believe the riches' wealth has risen by 1500% plus while everybody elses' has actually gone down when inflation is considered...
@Jack Smith I would love to know where you get your "facts".
@Jeepers Sounds to me like that one is likely anally derived...;)
@sargerator Tell me sarge, what article were you reading? Please put down your dogeared copy of the DNC talking points bulliton and read the article at hand. According to this article the wealthy pay most of the taxes in this country while the poor are actually subsidized by the tax code.
What is "fair share" Sarge? You don't have an answer, neither do I. It's so typical of your ilk to use meaningless terms like that to invoke the worst in us and ultimately say nothing at all.
Please respond to the article provided or don't respond at all. Pathetic.
"Typical of you ilk"...really ? As you aspouse for the top 2 % hey...because you are a 2 % er ? You do know the top 10% have over 70 % of the wealth so , again, whats wrong with them paying more in taxes ? This link isn't dnc talking points, though they may use them. This is from the Business Inside, hardly left leaning...Again, do some reading before you blather stuff like "your ilk" makes you lokk...well...stupid !
http://www.businessinsider.com/15-charts-about-wealth-and-inequality-in-america-2010-4?op=1
@agateriver The wealthy pay taxes? whaaaaaat.
@TreeWizard @agateriver Ahhh ... a gambler .... Vegas? Atlantic City or Northwest Indian Casino style? Either way, don't forget to declare your winnings on this bet and give 50% of it to Uncle Sam!
@agateriver @TreeWizard I bet they do.
@TreeWizard @agateriver According to this article they do. But who really knows, the world is flat.