Voters narrowly approving same-sex marriage
»Play Video
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Supporters of gay marriage in Washington state said they were in a "very strong position" Tuesday night, with early returns showing voters narrowly approving same-sex marriage in the state after residents gave similar measures the go-ahead in Maryland and Maine.
With about half the expected ballots counted, Referendum 74 was passing with 52 percent of the vote.
The measure asked Washingtonians to approve or reject a state law legalizing same-sex marriage that lawmakers passed earlier this year. That law was signed by Gov. Chris Gregoire but has been on hold pending the election's outcome.
"I think it's premature to declare victory, but we're in a very strong position," said Zach Silk, a spokesman for Washington United for Marriage, which supports gay marriage.
Other supporters were even more optimistic, cheering and hugging in response to the results at election watch parties in the state. In Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood, the police closed off several blocks for an outdoor election celebration, where more than 1,000 people were dancing and chanting "74, 74, 74."
The measure was losing in 31 of the state's 39 counties. But it had its strongest lead - 65 percent of the vote - in King County, the state's largest county and home to Seattle.
About $13.6 million has been spent on the campaign, with the bulk of it coming from gay marriage supporters. Washington United for Marriage far outraised its opponents, bringing in more than $12 million compared with the $2.7 million raised by Preserve Marriage Washington, which opposes the law.
"We remain cautiously optimistic that when all the ballots are in that the voters of Washington will not redefine marriage," said Chip White, a Preserve Marriage spokesman. "We don't need to win King County to win the state. There's still a path to victory for us."
Maine and Maryland on Tuesday night became the first states to approve same-sex marriage by popular vote. They join six other states - New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont - and the District of Columbia in allowing gay marriage.
Maine's measure passed with 54 percent of the vote, while the measure in Maryland matched Washington state's lead of 52-48 percent. In Minnesota, voters rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage in their state. Gay marriage remains illegal under Minnesota state law.
In Washington, preliminary results from exit polling data showed there were political and religious divides among voters over the measure - with just one in five Republicans backing it, compared with more than eight in 10 Democrats and a majority of independents.
Those who attend weekly church services were more strongly opposed to gay marriage. Just one-quarter of weekly churchgoers backed the legalization of same-sex marriage, while four out of five voters who never attend church favored it. A majority of married women supported R-74, but married men broke against it.
Voters in Eastern Washington tied on the issue.
The survey of Washington voters was conducted for The Associated Press and television networks by Edison Research. It included preliminary results from a survey of 1,493 voters who voted early or absentee and were interviewed by landline or cellular telephone from Oct. 29 through Nov. 4. Results for the full sample were subject to sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points; it is higher for subgroups.
The road to gay marriage in Washington state began several years ago.
A year after the state's gay marriage ban was upheld by the state Supreme Court, the state's first domestic partnership law passed in 2007, granting couples about two dozen rights, including hospital visitation and inheritance rights when there is no will. It was expanded a year later, and then again in 2009, when lawmakers completed the package with the so-called "everything but marriage" bill that was ultimately upheld by voters later that same year.
This year, lawmakers passed the law allowing gay marriage, and Gregoire signed it in February. Preserve Marriage gathered enough signatures for a referendum, and the law never took effect, instead remaining on hold pending the election.
If voters uphold the law, gay couples could start picking up their marriage certificates and licenses from county auditor offices Dec. 6, a day after the election is certified. However, because Washington state has a three-day waiting period, the earliest the certificate could be signed, making the marriage valid, is Dec. 9.
The law doesn't require religious organizations or churches to perform marriages, and doesn't subject churches to penalties if they don't marry gay or lesbian couples.
The outcomes of the measures in Maine and Maryland broke a 32-state streak that dated back to 1998 in which gay marriage had been rejected by every state that voted on it. The other states that allow gay marriage either enacted laws or issued court rulings permitting it.
With about half the expected ballots counted, Referendum 74 was passing with 52 percent of the vote.
The measure asked Washingtonians to approve or reject a state law legalizing same-sex marriage that lawmakers passed earlier this year. That law was signed by Gov. Chris Gregoire but has been on hold pending the election's outcome.
"I think it's premature to declare victory, but we're in a very strong position," said Zach Silk, a spokesman for Washington United for Marriage, which supports gay marriage.
Other supporters were even more optimistic, cheering and hugging in response to the results at election watch parties in the state. In Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood, the police closed off several blocks for an outdoor election celebration, where more than 1,000 people were dancing and chanting "74, 74, 74."
The measure was losing in 31 of the state's 39 counties. But it had its strongest lead - 65 percent of the vote - in King County, the state's largest county and home to Seattle.
About $13.6 million has been spent on the campaign, with the bulk of it coming from gay marriage supporters. Washington United for Marriage far outraised its opponents, bringing in more than $12 million compared with the $2.7 million raised by Preserve Marriage Washington, which opposes the law.
"We remain cautiously optimistic that when all the ballots are in that the voters of Washington will not redefine marriage," said Chip White, a Preserve Marriage spokesman. "We don't need to win King County to win the state. There's still a path to victory for us."
Maine and Maryland on Tuesday night became the first states to approve same-sex marriage by popular vote. They join six other states - New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont - and the District of Columbia in allowing gay marriage.
Maine's measure passed with 54 percent of the vote, while the measure in Maryland matched Washington state's lead of 52-48 percent. In Minnesota, voters rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage in their state. Gay marriage remains illegal under Minnesota state law.
In Washington, preliminary results from exit polling data showed there were political and religious divides among voters over the measure - with just one in five Republicans backing it, compared with more than eight in 10 Democrats and a majority of independents.
Those who attend weekly church services were more strongly opposed to gay marriage. Just one-quarter of weekly churchgoers backed the legalization of same-sex marriage, while four out of five voters who never attend church favored it. A majority of married women supported R-74, but married men broke against it.
Voters in Eastern Washington tied on the issue.
The survey of Washington voters was conducted for The Associated Press and television networks by Edison Research. It included preliminary results from a survey of 1,493 voters who voted early or absentee and were interviewed by landline or cellular telephone from Oct. 29 through Nov. 4. Results for the full sample were subject to sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points; it is higher for subgroups.
The road to gay marriage in Washington state began several years ago.
A year after the state's gay marriage ban was upheld by the state Supreme Court, the state's first domestic partnership law passed in 2007, granting couples about two dozen rights, including hospital visitation and inheritance rights when there is no will. It was expanded a year later, and then again in 2009, when lawmakers completed the package with the so-called "everything but marriage" bill that was ultimately upheld by voters later that same year.
This year, lawmakers passed the law allowing gay marriage, and Gregoire signed it in February. Preserve Marriage gathered enough signatures for a referendum, and the law never took effect, instead remaining on hold pending the election.
If voters uphold the law, gay couples could start picking up their marriage certificates and licenses from county auditor offices Dec. 6, a day after the election is certified. However, because Washington state has a three-day waiting period, the earliest the certificate could be signed, making the marriage valid, is Dec. 9.
The law doesn't require religious organizations or churches to perform marriages, and doesn't subject churches to penalties if they don't marry gay or lesbian couples.
The outcomes of the measures in Maine and Maryland broke a 32-state streak that dated back to 1998 in which gay marriage had been rejected by every state that voted on it. The other states that allow gay marriage either enacted laws or issued court rulings permitting it.
A lot of these "issues" are simply about what should be covered under Medicaid.
The Democrats run around getting the population all in a hissy fit about emotional/moral issues but they don't explain it is all a money thing.
It is all about what taxpayers should pay for and some legal issues, like hospital rights for visitation.
Meanwhile, the Democrats have the people at each other's throats and accusing the right of being so cruel.
When you approve of gay marriage then you may also be approving of two people to be covered under one eligibility application to the state - not just one.
Now, you have doubled the size of the number of insureds.Â
It's you who are going to pay and the Democrats who think nothing of making you pay. In fact, their power grows as they get you to agree to pay more and more and public agencies have to expand and then you pay more for the state to administer the larger programs.
Â
Â
I don't believe the voting results are correct for any of the liberal issues.
"100,000 Stolen Votes in Chicago" - Heritage Press
Â
God still won't approve this so called "gay" marriage. Sorry Washington.
@Bill FWI God is a figment of your imagination.
 @Bill Yeah, but Jesus probably would.  He and his dad never could manage to see eye to plucked out eye on things.
 @Festivus  @BillÂ
Â
You are ON FIRE man!
Â
@Bill Does he approve the high rate of divorce and adultery? I think he gave up on blended fabrics and tattoos a few years back, but that 'revolving door' marriage thing probably still chaps his hide.
I guess we now know what Sam Adams next move is going to be.
I wonder when voters will approve of straight marriage
 @archon312 Turns out it has about the same support as either of last night's candidates. Â
Boy... Where to begin.
Â
I am straight, a Christian, married for 20+ years. I am for Gay marriage and for reasons that, I hope, will make everyone think. Those on both sides of the argument will hate me, call me a fraud, a heretic, but... here goes.
Â
Short and sweet: Christians need to shut up if they've been divorced. Before they marry (AGAIN) they should be forced to sit in marriage seminars taught by gay couples who have been HAPPILY together for more than 15 years.Â
Â
Gay sand Lesbians need to examine, for THEMSELVES, the claims of the Bible, written by a God who loves them, and EXAMINE why they have same sex attractions. God does LOVE YOU and disapproves of homosexuality (the same way He loves ME and detests my pride, temper and self righteousness).
Â
I told you I'd make everyone mad! I did it. But,  I say this because most of the married couples in my church are/have been DIVORCED. The so-called Biblical marriage counseling offered by the pulpit is often philosophical BS which does nothing to help a couple enjoy a happy and successful marriage, or help a troubled couple avoid divorce by helping them with practical relationship skills.Â
Â
Now, Come on christian! Ask yourself  "How come they (the Homos) can do it and you (Straight Christians) can't!?" Maybe the Gay/Lesbian community can teach us something to actually make our marriages WORK. I have a feeling that the 'secret' is Charity. It's a concept in the Bible. Those who read it will find it, along with your favorite passages dealing with God's judgement on sinners.Â
Â
 @Stu Logan I find it amusing, or is it just arrogance to assume everyone is a christian ?Â
Those bible thumpers always bust out with the " homosexuality is against gods will ", if you really believe all that nonsense you would find many things equally idiotic... How said for people to have a need to have an eye in the sky to make the be decent people.. Shameful actually !
Are you objecting to cultural values? You wouldn't if it was someone from India or from Africa - would you.Â
Wow i guess Porltand is no longer the bastian of ubar liberal left-wing-nuts anymore.
Â
Have fun living in Seattle.
Â
 @Repoman I think you meant "Have a FABULOUS time living in Seattle".
Â
You're welcome. Â
 Homosexuality is a disease. I hope that one day doctors can find a cure for these poor, sick people. I can think of a cure for it but it would not be nice to write it here.
that way of thinking is a disease
 The meaning of marriage has changed quite a bit through time. Marriage used to be arranged contracts to gain land and goats and heirs (male children mostly)... nothing about love or service and sacrifice. And if your definition of marriage is accurate then why did it take so long for interracial marriage to become legal? Two people, of opposite sex, wanted to marry and raise children.... and yet the religious right went on a high-holy crusade about that in the 40's, 50's and 60's as well. And what about couples who are barren or sterile, or just don't want children... should they not be allowed to get married?  And what about these quicky 2 day celebrity marriages/divorces... should they become illegal? And what about divorce then? Should we ban that as well? After all, all of the above-mentioned things do not fit in your definition of "what marriage is".Â
Â
I would have much more respect for attitudes like these if they were consistent. If people were fighting just as hard to ban divorce, and those 3 hour Vegas marriages, and to have benefits taken away from childless couples, etc. But no one is doing that. They're simply focused on gays... 2 loving, devoted people who want to share their lives with each other and raise a family (yes, gays can have children and in many places adopt children).
Â
Bottom line is your definition of "what marriage is" is just that... yours. Legally, the gov't has a different opinion. Religiously, many clerics have a different opinion. But, hey, you know what they say about opinions.... :)
@Dean       Interracial - like in the Japanese who did not want their daughters to marry white men of different cultures? There is race and there is culture and it was grandparents who wanted their grandchildren to look like them - that is kind of a universal comfort and pride thing. Who is to say that the marriages may have lasted longer if the individuals married someone who was in the same culture and race. In fact, in my high school, some of the people who married their high school sweethearts are still together after many years.Â
By the same token - why be married to only humans? Some people might feel closer to their pet pig.
This is all about Medicaid and who and what should be covered. When you add gay marriage you are doubling the number of insureds.Â
It would be nice if they all went to Washington and didn't come back!
Sounds just as crazy as this story, wow never thought all this stuff would happen so fast.
Privacy's last stand is taking place not far from The Alamo in Texas right now, to hear some people tell it. Two schools in San Antonio have begun tracking students using radio-enabled computer chips embedded in their ID cards, allowing administrators to know the precise whereabouts of their charges on campus -- be it in class, in the bathroom, in a stairwell or AWOL
 @lee986321Â
Â
This is the sacrifice of liberty for security.
Â
Franklin warned against such things.
Â
But that is not related to this story.
Â
@lee986321 You never fail to make me LOL.
Marriage is between a man & a women. Â Anything else is just a fraud.
 @sortbait I agree and a very persevered one at that. but it appears, the depravity of man is finally showing its ugly side. but arguing words won't get any where.. it is what will come that should have us all afraid. Go and rejoice, for yoiur time is indeed short. For that which is done can be undone, for all is temporary, and nothing new under the son..So as it was in the time of Sodom and Gomorrah so it is now. to bad it seems that man never learns his lessons.
@lee986321 Are you trying to say that before gays could get married everything was done according to the Bible's moral code. There were no divorces, and no adultery, that's silly. Youâve tried to paint God into a corner, as if this IS the issue that will cause... something. However, this issue is not a sign of moral decay.
Joseph Backholm could come out of the closet....just take one look at him...this is the prefect example of homophobia, one's own fear of being gay. Â
 @dougrpdx I understand, your for equal rights as long as they benefit you, not someone elses beliefs. Its O-kay the majority of you people are like that. Tunnel vision to see the world as you want it.
 @Ol'Fish  @dougrpdxÂ
In what way if doug not defending your rights?
Â
he is not saying you should not speak, he is saying he disagrees with what you are speaking.
Â
You are welcome to believe what you want, but be prepared for others to disagree.
Â
Â
 @Ol'Fish  @dougrpdx I wasn't looking forward to this, but now I have to go home and slap my wife around since my marriage has been rendered a complete and utter sham now that Washington lets the gays do it. Â
Â
God, I don't know what I was thinking these last 27 years staying married to the same woman. Â Free at last, thank god I am free at last!Â
 @Festivus  @Ol'Fish I bet that slapping wouldn't be the first !
 @dougrpdx  @Ol'Fish Really.  You have inside knowledge that would lead to believe that I'm a wife beater from way back?
Â
It would in fact be a first, just as I'm sure that there would not be a second.
Now we just have to legalize polygamy because love is love and fair is fair. Its interesting as a society how we justify things to make it equal rights except when as a society we dont consider it to be right.
 @Ol'Fish or legalize bestiality after all....and before you making the remark of a lack of education, just remember "Nothing was a sin in the city's of Sodom and Gomorrah .The truly uneducated have not learned from ancient history and have failed to adhere to its warnings be it biblical or other other events. the Uneducated chose to ignore all facts that have taken place and have failed to learn from those facts.
 @lee986321  @Ol'Fish Everybody knows today what Sodom must have been famous for.  But what about Gomorrah?  I wonder what it's like to be Gomorramized?  How come they never get the credit?
 @Ol'Fish If you want to take up that charge, then be my guest.
 @Ol'Fish While we're at it let's legalize lack of education.. Oh wait, you graduated from that school..
I'm just happy we can ALL quit hearing about it now!
Voters approved Gay marriage, no one cares how narrow the win was, but thanks Katu for mentioning it..
I am really happy about this. People need to seriously re-evaluate their attitudes and bullying toward gay people and just leave them in peace. Their ability to marry one another does not and will not impede on traditional heterosexual/church-sanctioned marriages WHAT.SO.EVER. The heat that this topic has is absolutely ridiculous. We should be past this by now.
Joy is shared among my fellow human beings tonight because we are closer to truly understanding the sameness that resides within us all. Bless our families, our homes and our society.
beautiful! :)
 @marflar There is nothing beautiful about these perverted sick individuals. God meant for Men and women to be married and no other combination is acceptable.Â
 @noneofyourbizzness Thank you good friend! I don't have a mate to marry, but I'm glad to see that the will of the people is shifting into more of a direction of equality for all.
@pdxd The Religous right lost in Minnesota.I have never imagined to see so many victories in one night for the LGBT community http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2012/11/breaking-minnesota-anti-gay-marriage-amendment-defeated/
Marriage is something of the heart and should not have to be given by putting it into the law. Something like this is not something that should be voted on. There should never have been a question about it in the first place, just as in interracial marriage should never have been a question. Two human beings want to pledge their forever love and form a life together. That is THEIR decision and choice! If more people would spend half as much time caring for their own 'so called' backyard, instead of butting into the business of every one else, the world would be a MUCH happier place. Too many people want to tell others how to run their lives, instead "BEING" the example. We are quick to offer our lip service of how we think it should be, but very few of us are actually a living example.Â
This is about happiness and two adults that love one another, and anyone that voted against this is either a coward and stricken by their extremist religious convictions, or sadistic and unknowing of love.
Â
Good for Washington, I'm proud of what you folks are doing!
As I have said before, it is NONE of my business who someone loves and wishes to be with in marriage regardless of their sexual orientation......I support equal rights/responsibilities for all LEGAL citizens of the United States and marriage is one of them
Victory is sweet! I'm so happy for the LGBT community in Washington.Also projected wins in Maine and Maryland.