Wash. campaign to legalize pot gets high-profile GOP support

SEATTLE (AP) - The campaign to legalize and tax marijuana for adults in Washington state is rolling as next month's vote approaches, with more than $1 million in new contributions reported since last week and a surprising endorsement Wednesday from Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Michael Baumgartner.
The money, most of it from retired Progressive Insurance founder Peter Lewis, means Initiative 502's backers have raised nearly $4.1 million over the course of the campaign, with $1.2 million left to spend. Alison Holcomb, campaign manager for New Approach Washington, says her group is planning a broader television campaign than the three-week advertising blitz it ran in Western Washington in August.
Meanwhile, Baumgartner's decision to endorse the initiative in an interview with The Associated Press gave the campaign one of its highest-profile Republican supporters yet. Baumgartner, a state senator from Spokane who is running a longshot bid to unseat Democratic U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell, said drug law reform isn't typically supported by his party, but he believes I-502 is a good step toward changing what he described as a wasteful policy of marijuana prohibition.
"It's taking a different approach to a very expensive drug war, and potentially a better approach," Baumgartner said. "They've checked all the boxes as far as what you would want to see happen in terms of provisions to keep it away from children and limiting access in the public space. I've just been impressed with the initiative and the people running it."
I-502 would legalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana under state law for those over 21. The state would license growers, processors and retail stores, and impose 25 percent taxes at each stage. State analysts have suggested it could bring in hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
The measure, which polls show leading, would also set a blood-test limit for driving under the influence and prohibit public use of the drug.
Marijuana would remain illegal under federal law, and the burning question remains whether the Justice Department would sue to try to block I-502 from taking effect if it passes, on the grounds that it conflicts with federal law. The DOJ could also simply seize any tax revenue as proceeds of illicit drug transactions.
Washington is one of three states, along with Oregon and Colorado, considering legalization measures this year.
Cantwell has yet to take a position on the initiative, which has received high-profile endorsements from former Seattle FBI head Charles Mandigo, former U.S. Attorneys John McKay and Kate Pflaumer (FLAU'-mer), and the nonprofit Children's Alliance, which argues that drug laws disproportionately hurt minority children.
The initiative's only formal opposition comes from a group representing medical marijuana patients who say the DUI limit is so strict it could prevent them from driving at all, but some other organizations, including the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, are also opposed.
Steve Freng, of the federally funded Northwest High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, said he worries about the effect on children, especially on the modeling behavior of parents who might start smoking weed openly in the home if it's legalized.
Baumgartner responded: "That's a concern, but we have to be realistic about what's going on in people's homes today. Usage stays constant regardless of drug policy."
Baumgartner served as a civilian State Department contractor in Afghanistan, where he advised an Afghan counternarcotics team in Helmand Province. He said one of his primary motives in supporting I-502 is to bring the U.S. marijuana trade out of the shadows and regulate it. If elected, he said, he'd support allowing states to draft their own drug laws "in a responsible manner."
He said he hoped voters who care about the issue would appreciate his taking a stand.
"I really don't know the direct political ramifications," Baumgartner said. "I always think if you get the policy right, the politics will follow."
The money, most of it from retired Progressive Insurance founder Peter Lewis, means Initiative 502's backers have raised nearly $4.1 million over the course of the campaign, with $1.2 million left to spend. Alison Holcomb, campaign manager for New Approach Washington, says her group is planning a broader television campaign than the three-week advertising blitz it ran in Western Washington in August.
Meanwhile, Baumgartner's decision to endorse the initiative in an interview with The Associated Press gave the campaign one of its highest-profile Republican supporters yet. Baumgartner, a state senator from Spokane who is running a longshot bid to unseat Democratic U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell, said drug law reform isn't typically supported by his party, but he believes I-502 is a good step toward changing what he described as a wasteful policy of marijuana prohibition.
"It's taking a different approach to a very expensive drug war, and potentially a better approach," Baumgartner said. "They've checked all the boxes as far as what you would want to see happen in terms of provisions to keep it away from children and limiting access in the public space. I've just been impressed with the initiative and the people running it."
I-502 would legalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana under state law for those over 21. The state would license growers, processors and retail stores, and impose 25 percent taxes at each stage. State analysts have suggested it could bring in hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
The measure, which polls show leading, would also set a blood-test limit for driving under the influence and prohibit public use of the drug.
Marijuana would remain illegal under federal law, and the burning question remains whether the Justice Department would sue to try to block I-502 from taking effect if it passes, on the grounds that it conflicts with federal law. The DOJ could also simply seize any tax revenue as proceeds of illicit drug transactions.
Washington is one of three states, along with Oregon and Colorado, considering legalization measures this year.
Cantwell has yet to take a position on the initiative, which has received high-profile endorsements from former Seattle FBI head Charles Mandigo, former U.S. Attorneys John McKay and Kate Pflaumer (FLAU'-mer), and the nonprofit Children's Alliance, which argues that drug laws disproportionately hurt minority children.
The initiative's only formal opposition comes from a group representing medical marijuana patients who say the DUI limit is so strict it could prevent them from driving at all, but some other organizations, including the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, are also opposed.
Steve Freng, of the federally funded Northwest High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, said he worries about the effect on children, especially on the modeling behavior of parents who might start smoking weed openly in the home if it's legalized.
Baumgartner responded: "That's a concern, but we have to be realistic about what's going on in people's homes today. Usage stays constant regardless of drug policy."
Baumgartner served as a civilian State Department contractor in Afghanistan, where he advised an Afghan counternarcotics team in Helmand Province. He said one of his primary motives in supporting I-502 is to bring the U.S. marijuana trade out of the shadows and regulate it. If elected, he said, he'd support allowing states to draft their own drug laws "in a responsible manner."
He said he hoped voters who care about the issue would appreciate his taking a stand.
"I really don't know the direct political ramifications," Baumgartner said. "I always think if you get the policy right, the politics will follow."
DAMN I DESPISE THIS new commenting site....calm down Yaquina.........
Â
WHY can I not grow this plant for personal use in my back yard?...I guess we own our property, and pay taxes on it even though the market value has dropped in half.................................and the taxes went up again.
Personally myself...thinking about the same person, I still smoke pot after decades of use....a couple of pinches a day.
Â
At first it was the high, and then it was the relief of pain for violent physical work ....and now the high is for relief of pain instead of using narcotics..
 Viscous circle that, and could also have the doors busted down anytime by the FEDS.
Â
Again I will post that my family has lived in the country legally for a very long time...early 1600 hundreds, both sides.
Â
We own property and pay all taxes for our jobs and property, and are denied permission from the Feds to grow a weed in our back yard....
Â
Please End This Reefer Madness NOW...thank you for your vote.
Â
Kinda makes me wish I liked pot...never liked the way I felt on it....sad...very sad
 @oh4FS Cannabis is so awesome.
@Sortbait, You statement makes no sense since Marijuana is NOT Addictive! Yes some weak minded people can become dependent on anything, no different than the Crazy Cat Lady who can not live with out 20 some cats in her house but there is NO Physical dependency what so ever.
 @swede760 Two studies in Sweden and one in Denmark indicate that physical addiction is, in fact, possible. Another from Denmark also shows that tlung damage and precancerous changes to the lungs are also common in pot smokers (something about the carcinogens in burned matrerial),
 @ShallowEnder Eat it, problem solved. Physical addiction? BFD.
@ShallowEnder, That is two studies out of hundreds that say otherwise. Also from personal experience, even with the most powerful medical THC available it is NOT physically addictive. Opiate meds are physiclly addictive and stop working at some point. I can go without my medical mj for as long as I want and will not get sick, I will be in major pain but I will not be sick or having withdrawals.
 @swede760 Personally myself...thinking about the same person, I still smoke pot after decades of use....a couple of pinches a day.
Â
At first it was the high, and then it was the relief of pain for violent physical work ....and now the high is for relief of pain instead of using narcotics..
 Viscous circle that and could also have the doors busted down anytime by the FEDS.
Â
Again I will post that my family has lived in the country legally for a very long time...early 1600 hundreds, both sides.
Â
We own property and pay all taxes for our jobs and property, and are denied permission from the Feds to grow a weed in our back yard....
Â
Please End This Reefer Madness NOW...thank you for your vote.
This comment has been deleted
 @Solipsist01 I know it was killing you, some lame photo of dirt weed- not of Oregon's best. What's next? KATU showing a close-up of a can of Hamm's for Brewfest?
 @Torino  @Solipsist01Â
Â
hahaha well said Tornio.
A state full of pot addicts is not good.
 @sortbait And ignorant posts are not good either, what's your point?
Legalize it !!!!
 @LostSoul I can't believe it's 2012 and we're still having to say legalize it!
Cannabis' origins are in Indo-China. The term "marijuana" comes from the South Americas and essentially means inebriation. Its incorporation into the English language is/was used to typify Mexicans as lazy, stoned people that are trying to take white peoples jobs. Genetically, Cannabis Sativa and Cannabis Indica have nothing to do with the South Americas. And you know all those tomato ingredients in Italian cuisine, they actually are native to the South Americas and were thought be poisonous. Continuing to call cannabis "marijuana" simply reinforces some very serious racist ideology from the early twentieth century and beyond.
Â
Furthermore, industrial hemp (with China being the major producer these days) is next to impossible to utilize as a drug in any practical way. There are different strains that have been bred over the centuries for particular attributes. The stuff you see in High Times was specifically bred for its drug properties. Industrial hemp is selectively bred for its fiber quality. The central issue here is far more complicated than the pharmalogical aspects of cannabis.
"The initiative's only formal opposition comes from a group representing medical marijuana patients who say the DUI limit is so strict it could prevent them from driving at all, but some other organizations, including the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, are also opposed."
Â
The problem with the war on any pot use...is that it hangs out for a very long time...weeks.
Â
The last party that you indulged, weeks ago will bust you as 'dirty'...however, alcohol, meth, cocaine or prescription drugs would be long gone from your system.Â
Â
It is all about control of what you do on your free time at home...and pot loses every time. Just check the prison records...card or no card, medical or not.
Â
I am over 60 years old, a legal tax paying adult, and it is against the law to grow a plant in my back yard for personal use.
Â
Please end this decades of madness now.
Â
Â
 @yaquina In the future this period of time will be looked upon with wonder at how a weed could stay illegal for so long. Alcohol is legal, yet far more devastating in every way possible. Our police resources should be allocated to far more pressing matters of violent crime, and serious drugs like meth and heroin. As you said, end this madness!
 @randomdude Much like we look back at the lunacy of alcohol prohibition in the 1920's. Big difference is the gang crime that accompanied prohibition because alcohol was moved to the black market, um, wait a minute.....Nope, there's no difference from cannabis prohibition and Mexican drug cartels today.
Â
Those that refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
I allways vote freedom first.
From the article:Â "Steve Freng said he worries about the effect on children, especially on the modeling behavior of parents who might start smoking weed openly in the home if it's legalized."
Â
Children are inquisitive and ask a lot of questions. There's no problem in being open about it and treating it like alcohol or cigarettes unless you've been brainwashed by media propaganda.
Â
It comes down to what kind of parent you are and how you raise your kids, regardless of if you smoke weed or not.
Â
Â
 @str1ngb3nd3r "Steve Freng said he worries about the effect on children, especially on the modeling behavior of parents who might start smoking weed openly in the home if it's legalized."
Â
I wonder if he's equally concerned about daddy burning through a sixer of Budweiser tall boys.
 @str1ngb3nd3r there is even a children's book about it being only a plant, good book, explains very well about it.
 @Someone Will you let sorbait know the name of the book, he's still having issues with cannabis facts.