Wash. lawmaker pulls self-defense bill after threats

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — A Washington state lawmaker last week withdrew a bill to limit self-defense rights after saying she receiving threats by telephone and email that have made her fear for her life.
Rep. Sherry Appleton, D-Poulsbo, said House Bill 1012, filed last month, was spurred by the Trayvon Martin shooting last February, in which a neighborhood watch volunteer in Florida shot dead the unarmed Martin, 17, after confronting him on the street.
The shooter, George Zimmerman, was not immediately arrested after the shooting, with local law enforcement citing Florida's "stand your ground" law as justification for his actions. Zimmerman was subsequently arrested and charged with second-degree murder last April. His case is pending.
Appleton's bill would have required a person to retreat from a dangerous confrontation that person "knows or should know" that doing so would afford "complete safety."
"I was so appalled by the Trayvon Martin shooting," Appleton said. "I did the bill because we have no verbiage on 'duty to retreat' in Washington."
Washington is one of at least 29 states with no explicit duty to retreat. Some other states employ a "castle doctrine," exempting a person in his home from the duty to retreat.
Appleton said her bill was written in September and she lamented that it was caught up in the reignited national debate over guns in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting massacre in Newtown, Conn., in which 26 people, including 20 children, were killed.
"It's unfortunate, because Newtown happened, and that riled up so many people," Appleton said. "I think it would have gone unnoticed if it hadn't been for Newtown."
The threats against Appleton, which were among the more than a hundred emails and telephone calls she received about the bill after reports of it circulated on gun advocacy websites, were non-specific but "very scary," said her assistant, Donna Bezon.
Bezon declined to provide copies of emails or transcripts of voice messages to The Associated Press, saying she wanted to spare Appleton, who has not seen the worst of them, the details contained therein. But she said the most concerning included information about where Appleton lived.
One advised the lawmaker to heed the lesson of an unnamed lawyer who had defended "murderers and rapists" but who had changed his allegiances after his family was attacked, Bezon said.
One of the perceived threats was forwarded to the state House of Representatives' security office, said House Security Director Mark Arras.
"There was no direct or immediate threat, but there was disturbing language," said Arras, adding that his office discussed it with the Washington State Patrol and continues to monitor the situation.
Appleton conceded that the bill could have been written more narrowly, but said the threats have left her fearful and unwilling to pursue such legislation again.
"I'm not going to fall on my sword to have to live with those kinds of threats," Appleton said. "It will have to be somebody else that will do the bill."
Rep. Matt Shea, R-Spokane Valley, a gun enthusiast, said he was heartened by the strong negative response to the measure — but he condemned any physical threats.
"When the grassroots gets involved like they did and they call her up and they say, 'Hey, we oppose this,' that's grassroots activism at its finest," said Shea. "Anytime anyone on either side of the aisle gets threatened, obviously that doesn't help."
The bill was removed last week from the House's official register of bills.
___
Follow AP writer Jonathan Kaminsky at www.twitter/jekaminsky
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
you reap what you sow
""It's unfortunate, because Newtown happened, and that riled up so many people," Appleton said. "I think it would have gone unnoticed if it hadn't been for Newtown.""
Â
Really, she was wanting to just slide it through unnoticed? That is some sneaky stuff.
 @Randy Heim My thoughts exactly. A rather telling revelation, really - a lawmaker admitting they wanted to sneak a law through without anyone noticing. I'm sure she's just one of many.
Her comments show her true colors. "She" was appalled by the Zimmerman case, so she tried to sneak it through "unnoticed". A truly caring politician looking out for the best interests of her constituents.. NOT! It was all about what she wanted, and when the public found out, she tucked tail and ran away.
Sounds like she got to thinking, and didn't want to go to jail if she defended herself from perceived threats.Â
WTF???
Its too bad she pulled her bill.  These nutbags who are threatening her want to keep the 'liberty' to shoot people they statistically most likely know with their guns, on accident or in a fit of rage.
Bottom Line is We the people are getting fed up with Government interference and we won't take it no more.
Not sharing the e-mails is also showing the right of privacey to others.
Â
But, I do not and will not stand for Physical threats or harm to others.
But if forceful language is what it will take to get the government to listen, then it is time to use it to put the fear into them that oppose freedoms and rights.
Â
So it is possible to stop and kill a bill before it hits.
"A Washington state lawmaker last week withdrew a bill to limit self-defense rights after saying she receiving threats by telephone and email that have made her fear for her life."
Â
Reduce the ability for citizens to protect themselves and this is the result.
Â
Bottom line, gun owners are getting fed up with government intrusion into their lives and won't put up with it. Try to pass or even pass laws that restrict the rights of gun owners and expect this kind of attention or even worse.
Â
Government is getting more and more intrusive into the affairs of ordinary citizens and is totally responsible for the state of the economy. Once the economy gets worse it could be real dangerous to be a politician.
 @RalphCramden Or a citizen for that matter Ralph.
I guess her next step would be to make it a crime not to hand over your property when being robbed.
Headline should have read "anti-self-defense" bill. But, coming from the AP, I would expect no less.
What a doofus!!! In the Martin case, Zimmerman DID retreat. All evidence points to the fact that Zimmerman was being attacked AFTER he retreated. What exactly would this proposed bill would have done?
@Conspirator I don't believe he (Zimmerman) did retreat. He actually FOLLOWED Martin after the dispatcher told him to stand down. The facts are not out there yet. The jury will have them, and then maybe we will both know. The proposed bill would have introduced a measure of sanity into this whole problem What a bunch of chickensh**s to be making anonymous threats. How childish, and more evidence yet that we need to know who has the guns.
@Mechanic Your "fact" are not accurate at all. Also this whole I'm backing down because of a threat is such B.S. I am laughing that you are believing it.
Poulsbo, Washington, with a population of 9245 should have NO difficulty voting her out and doing it soon.  with less than 10000 people in the town, they should all be on a first name basis with her, and yet she was hoping to "slide one under the radar" on her neighbors and friends.
Â
This is despicable behavior - intentionally trying to pass bills based upon your own beliefs before those of your constituents???  don't you see something dreadfully wrong here?  How much more elitist, self-absorbed, duplicitous and self- righteous can you be, Sherry?
Â
I doubt she heard anything truly alarming, but I'll bet she heard a LOT of anger over her mis-representing and unprofessional behavior. Â Go take a walk through town, Sherry... see if people approve of your actions.
@Umhal And making anonymous threats on someone's life is NOT despicable? If the bill were introduced, it gets approved or voted down. That's how things are supposed to work here. In the Middle East (with lots of guns and explosives) it is OK to threaten or kill anyone you disagree with. Not here.
 @Mechanic "There was no direct or immediate threat, but there was disturbing language". This tells you there were NO threats on her life! The disturbing language was probably her constituents telling her how stupid her bill is, and how they felt about her trying to get it in "under the radar". That tells you that she was very underhanded in her attempts. Is this the kind of person YOU would want to represent you? The kind that wants bills to go unnoticed until they become law?
 @doxiemom2008 The fact she won't release the details of the disturbing language makes me suspicious. I'm speculate that she simply wants people to believe her life was threatened.
"Appleton's bill would have required a person to retreat from a dangerous confrontation that person "knows or should know" that doing so would afford "complete safety." "I was so appalled by the Trayvon Martin shooting," Appleton said. "I did the bill because we have no verbiage on 'duty to retreat' in Washington."
Â
She obviously doesn't realize how stupid this sounds.
@Scotty9 Well, you are no smarter than she is. Neither of you appears to know what "vebiage" is. Look it up. Noun Speech or writing that uses too many words or excessively technical expressions. Synonyms verbosity
@Mechanic
You might want to check your spelling before you shoot of your mouth
 @Mechanic  @Scotty9Â
Â
I'm sorry, your comment went way over my head, which based on my intelligence level, makes complete sense. Perhaps you meant to post in on another story's board?
@Mechanic Hahahaha, you have trouble forming cogent thoughts don't you?
"I think it would have gone unnoticed if it hadn't been for Newtown."
Â
That says it all.
Let's hear the "the disturbing language" Appleton. You have nothing to hide, right?
Yeahhh... criminalize the victims for defending themselves. Â Nice.Â
Â
Â