Wash. lawmakers consider bill to abolish death penalty
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — Efforts to abolish the death penalty have never gained political traction in Washington state, but supporters of the move aren't giving up.
The latest bill on the issue is sponsored by Democratic Rep. Reuven Carlyle of Seattle, who doesn't expect it to pass this year but says it will spur further debate at a time when public attitudes about capital punishment are changing.
"We are in the midst of a profound shift in thinking, in large part because of the impact of DNA testing," he said. "I believe the public is undergoing a rapid transformation in their view given the fact that we have repeated headlines about injustices in terms of the wrongly convicted."
The death penalty is currently used by the federal government and 33 states. Seventeen have abolished it, with Connecticut being the most recent last year, though its ban only applies to new cases.
A death penalty statute is still on the books in Oregon, but Gov. John Kitzhaber stopped an execution in 2011 and declared no one would be put to death during his time in office.
Several other states have introduced measures this year, including Nebraska, Montana and Maryland, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The Maryland state Senate is expected to vote Wednesday on its measure.
Carlyle's bill to end capital punishment in Washington also will receive a public hearing on Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee. It's co-sponsored by 20 other lawmakers, including one Republican, Rep. Maureen Walsh of Walla Walla.
The last execution in the state came in September 2010, when Cal Coburn Brown died by lethal injection for the 1991 murder of a Seattle-area woman. After spending nearly 17 years on death row, he was the first Washington inmate executed since 2001.
Since 1904, 78 men have been put to death in Washington. Eight men are now on death row at the state penitentiary.
A coalition known as Safe and Just Alternatives was formed in 2011 to try to have the death penalty abolished in the state. Mishi Faruqee, the group's campaign manager, said that over the past year, it has been focused on community outreach on the issue.
Faruqee believes momentum is building in the state, even though bills introduced in past years to abolish the death penalty have not garnered much support.
"Given the budget shortfalls that Washington state is having, ending the death penalty is a very clear way for the state to save money," she said.
Death penalty cases cost about $470,000 more to prosecute and defend than aggravated murder cases that don't involve the death penalty, according to a 2006 Washington Bar report. On appeal, costs average about $100,000 more for death penalty cases than for non-death penalty cases.
Spending has become a key issue for lawmakers, who are in the midst of a 105-day legislative session aimed at patching a projected $1 billion deficit for the two-year budget ending in 2015. The figure does not include a court-ordered requirement to get more money into the education system.
Still, Sen. Mike Carrell, R-Lakewood, chairman of the Senate Human Services & Corrections panel, opposes any discussion of abolishing the death penalty.
"When I ask myself, what would the victims think justice is, I know what the answer is," he said. "The death penalty is appropriate for extreme cases."
A companion bill in the Senate hasn't received a public hearing this session. Republican Sen. Mike Padden of Spokane Valley, chairman of the Senate Law & Justice Committee, wouldn't say why, and he didn't want to talk about his thoughts on the death penalty unless the House measure advances and is sent to his committee.
The Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys is split on the issue and hasn't taken a position on the latest bill.
"We do defend the constitutionality of the current statute and how it has been applied in Washington state," Tom McBride, executive secretary of the association, wrote in an email. "The moral question as to whether to have a death penalty is appropriately decided by the Legislature."
___
The death penalty abolition bill is House Bill 1504.
___
Online:
http://www.leg.wa.gov
http://www.sjawa.org
___
Follow Rachel La Corte at http://www.twitter.com/RachelAPOly or http://www.facebook.com/news.rachel
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
It should only be repealed if the alternative is so harsh that the inmate would rather have had the death penalty. Â That is the only way it will be fair to the victim or victims.
Just leave it as is until someone proves that an innocent was executed by mistake. SCOTUS will do away with it nationwide then. (Both Alito and Thomas have publically said as much, and Roberts has implied as much.)
And victims are supporting a bill to avoid their being killed during the commission of a crime by the suspect!
The way crime is going, repeat drunk  drivers, I think the death sentence should be applicable only for lawmakers.  They have their ignorant heads buried in the sand when they should be enacting stiffer punishment for drunk drivers and  sex offenders.
Leaving Washington state for Texas state if something like this passes.
@Michael McWilliams Yeah, since Washington has used it soooo many times -- 5 times since 1976.  Need a link?
Leave our death penalty alone! I know many of you cry foul because of prior potentially "innocent" people being put to death. But guess what, since our DNA and other technology is so much further advanced now, we shouldn't have those issues. If DNA PROVES guilt, then death should follow. Stinger139 says it well "the decision should be made by the voters". I believe the voters have indeed made the decision, so let it rest and quit spending our tax dollars trying to go against the will of the voters. QUIT trying to be like Oregon!Â
I think the decision should be made by the voters and no one else. If they vote for it, then give up the attempts year in and year out haggling over the money. You want to cut the costs, quit dragging out the appeals for years and years. If you kill someone with malice then you should die also, and not have it take 20 years.
@stinger139Â There is nothing to vote about.
@Michael McWilliams @stinger139 @Dr. Rawdog That's what they said in the south about civil rights. Â