Voters approve same-sex marriage; opponents concede
»Play Video
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Washington state has approved gay marriage, joining Maine and Maryland as the first states to pass same-sex marriage by popular vote.
Voter returns released since election night show Referendum 74 has maintained its lead of 52 percent. Opponents conceded the race Thursday, while supporters declared victory a day earlier.
Zach Silk, a spokesman for Washington United for Marriage, called it a "historic day."
"We have always understood that there are good people on the other side of this issue," he said in a statement issued Thursday. "Yet, we remain confident that once people see how much marriage matters to families, they will realize that the love and commitment that marriage embodies only strengthens families, neighborhoods and communities."
R-74 asked people to approve or reject a state law legalizing same-sex marriage that legislators passed earlier this year. That law was signed by Gov. Chris Gregoire but has never taken effect. It was on hold pending the election's outcome.
Washington is one of four states where voters were asked about the issue this election cycle. Maryland and Maine approved gay marriage Tuesday night, while Minnesota voters rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage.
Six other states - New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont - and the District of Columbia already allowed gay marriage. But Maryland, Maine and Washington are the first to enact it by public vote. The other states' laws were enacted either by lawmakers or court rulings.
In Washington, more than half of the expected ballots have been counted and additional results are expected to be posted Thursday evening. Because Washington is a vote-by-mail state, and ballots only had to be postmarked by Tuesday, votes will continue to trickle in throughout the week.
The measure was losing in 31 of the state's 39 counties. But it had its strongest lead - 66 percent of the vote - in King County, which holds about a third of the state's voters and is home to Seattle.
Gregoire, who announced her support of gay marriage at the start of the legislative session in January, said she was proud of the result.
"Voters stood up for what is right and what is just and said that all Washington families are equal under the law," she said in a statement issued Thursday afternoon. "This is a day that historians will look back on as a turning point for equality."
Preserve Marriage Washington, meanwhile, issued a statement saying its members were disappointed but will "continue to educate citizens and policymakers on the timeless truth that real marriage is the union of one man and one woman."
"We are disappointed in losing a tough election battle on marriage by a narrow margin," said Joseph Backholm, the campaign chairman.
Backholm blamed several factors, saying Washington is a "deep blue state."
"The election results reflect the political and funding advantages our opponents enjoyed in this very liberal and secular state," he wrote. "The results show only that in a deep blue state, with a huge financial advantage, gay marriage activists can win - barely."
About $13.6 million was spent on the initiative in Washington state, with the bulk of it coming from gay marriage supporters. Washington United for Marriage far outraised its opponents, bringing in more than $12 million, including donations from big names like Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos, Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Opponents of gay marriage raised just $2.7 million.
Many supporters started celebrating early, taking to the streets in a Seattle neighborhood and cheering at election watch parties Tuesday night as early results showed the referendum taking a narrow lead. Police closed off several blocks in Seattle's Capitol Hill area as more than 1,000 people gathered for a late-night, impromptu election celebration, dancing and chanting "74, 74, 74."
Gay couples in Washington could start picking up their marriage certificates and licenses from county auditor offices Dec. 6, a day after the election is certified. However, because Washington has a three-day waiting period, the earliest a certificate could be signed, making the marriage valid, is Dec. 9.
The law doesn't require religious organizations or churches to perform marriages, and it doesn't subject churches to penalties if they don't marry gay or lesbian couples.
The path to gay marriage in Washington state began several years ago.
A 2006 state Supreme Court ruling upheld a 1998 law banning same-sex marriage. But earlier that year, a gay civil rights measure passed after the idea had failed for nearly 30 years, signaling a change of mindset in the Legislature.
The state's first domestic partnership law passed in 2007, granting couples about two dozen rights, including hospital visitation and inheritance rights when there is no will. It was expanded a year later, and then again in 2009, when lawmakers completed the package with the so-called "everything but marriage" law that was ultimately upheld by voters later that year.
This year, lawmakers passed the law allowing gay marriage, and Gregoire signed it in February. Preserve Marriage gathered enough signatures for a referendum, putting the law on hold before it could take effect.
State Sen. Ed Murray, a Democratic gay lawmaker from Seattle who sponsored the marriage law that passed the Legislature, said the outcome "rectifies an injustice that was done to gay and lesbian couples" when the state Legislature passed the Defense of Marriage Act banning gay marriage in the state.
Murray was in his third year as a state representative when that 1998 law passed. At the time, he was the state Legislature's lone gay lawmaker.
"I believe that when the marriages start happening next month, that will be a healing moment for this state," he said.
We asked you to describe, in one word, what the passage of Referendum 74 means to you. See your responses in the word cloud below.

Voter returns released since election night show Referendum 74 has maintained its lead of 52 percent. Opponents conceded the race Thursday, while supporters declared victory a day earlier.
Zach Silk, a spokesman for Washington United for Marriage, called it a "historic day."
"We have always understood that there are good people on the other side of this issue," he said in a statement issued Thursday. "Yet, we remain confident that once people see how much marriage matters to families, they will realize that the love and commitment that marriage embodies only strengthens families, neighborhoods and communities."
R-74 asked people to approve or reject a state law legalizing same-sex marriage that legislators passed earlier this year. That law was signed by Gov. Chris Gregoire but has never taken effect. It was on hold pending the election's outcome.
Washington is one of four states where voters were asked about the issue this election cycle. Maryland and Maine approved gay marriage Tuesday night, while Minnesota voters rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage.
Six other states - New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont - and the District of Columbia already allowed gay marriage. But Maryland, Maine and Washington are the first to enact it by public vote. The other states' laws were enacted either by lawmakers or court rulings.
In Washington, more than half of the expected ballots have been counted and additional results are expected to be posted Thursday evening. Because Washington is a vote-by-mail state, and ballots only had to be postmarked by Tuesday, votes will continue to trickle in throughout the week.
The measure was losing in 31 of the state's 39 counties. But it had its strongest lead - 66 percent of the vote - in King County, which holds about a third of the state's voters and is home to Seattle.
Gregoire, who announced her support of gay marriage at the start of the legislative session in January, said she was proud of the result.
"Voters stood up for what is right and what is just and said that all Washington families are equal under the law," she said in a statement issued Thursday afternoon. "This is a day that historians will look back on as a turning point for equality."
Preserve Marriage Washington, meanwhile, issued a statement saying its members were disappointed but will "continue to educate citizens and policymakers on the timeless truth that real marriage is the union of one man and one woman."
"We are disappointed in losing a tough election battle on marriage by a narrow margin," said Joseph Backholm, the campaign chairman.
Backholm blamed several factors, saying Washington is a "deep blue state."
"The election results reflect the political and funding advantages our opponents enjoyed in this very liberal and secular state," he wrote. "The results show only that in a deep blue state, with a huge financial advantage, gay marriage activists can win - barely."
About $13.6 million was spent on the initiative in Washington state, with the bulk of it coming from gay marriage supporters. Washington United for Marriage far outraised its opponents, bringing in more than $12 million, including donations from big names like Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos, Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Opponents of gay marriage raised just $2.7 million.
Many supporters started celebrating early, taking to the streets in a Seattle neighborhood and cheering at election watch parties Tuesday night as early results showed the referendum taking a narrow lead. Police closed off several blocks in Seattle's Capitol Hill area as more than 1,000 people gathered for a late-night, impromptu election celebration, dancing and chanting "74, 74, 74."
Gay couples in Washington could start picking up their marriage certificates and licenses from county auditor offices Dec. 6, a day after the election is certified. However, because Washington has a three-day waiting period, the earliest a certificate could be signed, making the marriage valid, is Dec. 9.
The law doesn't require religious organizations or churches to perform marriages, and it doesn't subject churches to penalties if they don't marry gay or lesbian couples.
The path to gay marriage in Washington state began several years ago.
A 2006 state Supreme Court ruling upheld a 1998 law banning same-sex marriage. But earlier that year, a gay civil rights measure passed after the idea had failed for nearly 30 years, signaling a change of mindset in the Legislature.
The state's first domestic partnership law passed in 2007, granting couples about two dozen rights, including hospital visitation and inheritance rights when there is no will. It was expanded a year later, and then again in 2009, when lawmakers completed the package with the so-called "everything but marriage" law that was ultimately upheld by voters later that year.
This year, lawmakers passed the law allowing gay marriage, and Gregoire signed it in February. Preserve Marriage gathered enough signatures for a referendum, putting the law on hold before it could take effect.
State Sen. Ed Murray, a Democratic gay lawmaker from Seattle who sponsored the marriage law that passed the Legislature, said the outcome "rectifies an injustice that was done to gay and lesbian couples" when the state Legislature passed the Defense of Marriage Act banning gay marriage in the state.
Murray was in his third year as a state representative when that 1998 law passed. At the time, he was the state Legislature's lone gay lawmaker.
"I believe that when the marriages start happening next month, that will be a healing moment for this state," he said.
We asked you to describe, in one word, what the passage of Referendum 74 means to you. See your responses in the word cloud below.

It's also ok to be straight, just in case these heterophobic, leftist man-hating liberals forgot
I hope Oregon continues to define marriage between a man and a woman. I tolerate the civil union but I don't have to accept it.
WHAT A SHAME.
@Bdou Nobody gives a hoot about your tolerance,acceptance or lack thereof.The LGBT community would appreciate if you mindyourownbizzness.If you don't like gay marriage,for christ's sake don't have one.Complete strangers are not obligated to abide by your wishes when it comes to the legal arraingements that they choose to enter into.Your church will not be required to perform gay marriages so basically if your sensitivities are being hurt by the actions of people in society that you don't approve of.
@noneofyourbizzness... I have the right to express my opinion on this subject on this comment page, so mind your own buisnes and don't show your mentality by calling me names.
@nyob I didn't lose anything.
 @noneofyourbizzness  @Bdou NOYB: Extra points if in the same article, you make one yourself: "If you knew your history, you'd know that this country was founded on it's faith in god. BTW Good luck."
@Bdou When one is badly losing a debate and there are no more relevant points to make,attack your opponets grammar as a last desperate resort.
@Bdou No I don't have to accept your opinion.Thats not what this country was founded upon.I have the freedom to my own opinion and the freedom to disagree with your opinion.If you must ask for freedom, you are not free. The only freedom you have is the freedom you imagine for yourself and actively require others to observe. It is a duty to take freedom for yourself, and it is a crime to take the freedom of another. Freedom does not come to you from the Constitution, the government, the Bible, God, your parents, a company, politician or bureaucrat. Freedom exists at the instant you claim it, and it usually vanishes when you fail to defend it.
 @Bdou Actually, it's not a right, it's tolerated by KATU, as are all of us; there are NO rights involved on this private property barring those KATU gives to us.  I don't quite see where NOYB called you a name myself.  As to minding our own business, may I suggest if you want people out of it, to not post publicly?  (Seriously, that's an </annnoyed grunt> moment.).  Once you post publicly, you've lost pretty much any and all right to "stay out of my business" per the post itself.
Â
And remember folks, it's The Bible - Brought to you by the people that said the world was flat!
@ noneofyourbizzness....Learn to spell. It's STYLE.
@Bdou When you express your opinion on comment page you should expect to have your opinion critisized.Thats how it works.If you want your opinion to go unchallenged and the majority of commenters will agree with you then I suggest a stile like the CBN news page,otherwiseits best that you refrain from making comments.No where in my comment to you did I call you any names btw.
And there ARE people out there that have the same opinion as I, so like it or not you have to accept it.
I think that I shall never see . . . .
A closeted heterosexual!
The bible talks about these times that we are now living, it will be just as the bible says! This once great nation was founding under "GOD" and has been blessed in so many ways!! But once we take all of "Gods" laws and through them out, WE WILL PAY!!!
@BlessedLife As a atheist I don't think that U.S citizens should be governed by the Koran or your Bible.I have the constitutional right to refuse to follow your personal Religous rules and regulations.If you want to follow them,fine but please stop trying to establish a theocracy.I cherish my freedoms as a American atheist.The voters have sent a strong message with the re election of The President and the gay marriage victories that they don't want your particular Religous choices to be made into law.Personally I find it offensive that you want society to bend to your rules.
If you knew your history, you'd know that this country was founded on it's faith in god. BTW Good luck.
 @BdouÂ
Bdou 306 pts
@ noneofyourbizzness....Learn to spell. It's STYLE.
Â
Learn to spell. Â It's its.
Â
BTW, there is no such thing as good or bad luck.  Luck is what you make of it.
Â
 @BlessedLife Dear God:
Please require your followers to be literate enough to read your word, before they preach.
Â
KTHXBAI
Now that Washington has thrown open the door to redefine marriage, let's take it to the next logical conclusion. When will polygamy become legal? Polygamy has been an acceptable option in many cultures for thousands of years, much longer than same sex marriage. Note that this is tounge and cheek, but it's an interesting thought arguement.
 @Concerned Citizen I like how you set the tone (erroneously) about "logical step"; if you had any logic at all, you'd recognize slippery slope which is a fallacy, not logic.  Nice try, but not.
@brendan In my opinion, allowing gay marriage is absolutely a slippery slope. The gay marriage argument is marriage equality for all, which would include polygamists. When you redefine marriage, you also need to consider the unintended consequences.
@LoveHiV @brendan @Concerned Citizen I will only respond to you by stating that I have witnessed the human suffering from the HIV virus.I will see to it that your account is removed even if it involves making a trip to KATU in person on Monday morning.Even people who oppose gay marriage should be horrified by such a inflammatory user name.HIV is a horrible disease that not only affects gay men but huge populations of people in third world countries.
@brendan @LoveHiV @Concerned Citizen I have contacted KATU webmaster as well as KATU management concerning the inflammatory user name "loveHIV.I encourage you to do the same.
 @brendan  @Concerned Citizen Again, how long did it take for you to do the research. Well did you not see(wear your bifocals) that I had mentioned- that homosexuality is a remedy to population control?? Will help our economy to and zeroing down on families:) Well good night. Hopefully someday you will think straight and save yourself from eternal damnation-that is if you believe in life after death. Otherwise---- the end!!
 @LoveHiV  @Concerned CitizenÂ
Â
1966: 3,419,728,217
2010: 6,830,586,985
Â
Nice excluded middle there.
 @brendan  @Concerned Citizen Remedy to population control!!!Hahaha
 @brendan  @Concerned Citizen Oh really, glad to know that you are well educated, but still unable to think straight=)  Well hopefully you will have grandchildren with your son accepting homosexuality. Or are you going to fight against him if he decides to accept it??
Â
I don't think I said that marriage has to have a requirement for procreation, (maybe you need to wear your bifocals before reading) but that is common sense.You must be so very old to say that the population has doubled- well yes maybe in China. Maybe they should legalize homosexuality too so as to decrease their population, huh=)
 @LoveHiV  @Concerned Citizen Uh, I'm engaged to a woman, and I have a 17yo son.  I think you've confused each of us with our stances, rofl.  Classic projection.  I love the ad hom up there.  "When all else fails, call them names".  Brings back memories of 2nd Grade recess, it does!
Â
I'm not sure what your point is about procreation, I don't think I've seen that as a requirement for marriage in any state...
Â
But I do love that I butt hurt you enough to call me a pussy. Â Instant win. Â Getting a bit emotionally attached to the issue?
Â
7 billion people on the planet, and you think it's going extinct.  I do not think that word means what you think it means, lol.  It means progressing towards ZERO, not moving blazingly fast AWAY from it, rofl.  I'm pretty sure the population of the planet has doubled since I was born, or close to it.
Â
But you are brave, brave indeed.  I sure wouldn't stick my neck out like that in public showing how ill-educated I am.
 @brendan  @Concerned Citizen By the way you are the one that needs to get back on meds. Anyone going out of normalcy needs meds. You still need a man and woman to procreate. Well this is the sign of extinction of human race.
 @LoveHiV  @Concerned Citizen Babble. Lemme know when you get back on the meds.
 @brendan  @Concerned Citizen If the animal is ok with having sex with a human, I don't see why that is not consenting. Just because the animal doesn't talk, does not mean that it is not consenting!! We are a nation of free will. The constitution should redefine what marriage is all about and just define it as marriage between a human and whoever the human being wants to have sex with. Soon homosapiens will be extinct as how can they procreate. The end of human race!!!
 @LoveHiV  @Concerned Citizen Best argument you've had yet, btw :)
 @LoveHiV  @Concerned Citizen Nice, it's blank.
 @brendan  @Concerned CitizenÂ
 @LoveHiV  @Concerned Citizen Ah, nice troll.  Except you've neatly avoided the whole "consenting adults" issue, now haven't you?  Then we move on to polygamy.  It's still a slippery slope.
 @Concerned Citizen  Redefine marriage?  Iirc, the Bible had polygamy.  Pretty sure that's not redefining it.  Polygamy exists throughout history; I seriously doubt there has been anytime it has not been practiced.
Â
Above all, marriage has not been redefined at all; marriage is still marriage - a civil commitment to another person. Â The only thing that has changed is who is *allowed* to have that relationship.
 @brendan  @Concerned Citizen I don't see why polygamy cannot be allowed. Gay marriage (which was once a slippery slope and is still is in many other states) is now permitted and now we should work towards polygamy. And there are people that have relationships with animals and so why don't we work in getting that legalized too!!!
 @Concerned Citizen How is it leading to Polygamy, you still have 1-person marrying 1-person, it's not 1- person marrying 5-people.
 @Concerned Citizen   It's already allowed, so it's not a slope, it's fact.  Pointing out what may come because of it, is slippery slope.
 @Concerned Citizen Sorry s/step/conclusion
Hmmm, 0 for 4 (Minnesota declined to change their constitution to prohibit anything other then 1M 1W)Â for the "edited Bible" crowd. (One man, one woman is directly contradicted by the bible in any number of places). Could be a trend . . . .
Â
 @ShallowEnder Got a handy list of those places (or a link)?
So where are all the people on here who claimed it wouldn't pass?
<crickets>
One victory after another for the LGBT community!The "let the voters decide" strategy is back firing in the faces of the folks who hate the idea of big government except when they love big government when it comes to groups of people that they don't approve of or their religion disapproves of. The day will come, probably sooner rather than later, when the Supreme Court will overturn DOMA and when marriage equality will exist in this country. The groups like NOM will have to decide whether to continue looking like the right-wing/fringe element they have become or to proceed into the 21st century. The results of this election show that the country is moving forward and that true equality will soon be the law of the land.What are these folks trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love. It isn't a non-renewable resource.My personal message to those who insist meddling in the personal affairs of their neighbors is Gay marriage is now a reality whether you want it to be oror not. You can't keep out progress forever.
 @noneofyourbizzness Yep. So glad that we are a big government that will accept any style of life. Hopefully soon we will see polygamy and humans marrying animals being legalized in the near future. America is a country of free will and anyone can choose to do anything or shoot anyone or live anyway they want!!!
 @LoveHiV  @noneofyourbizzness s/big government/voter majority
Â
Hate to tell you, in WA, it wasn't the government, it was the people, in an election.
Â
Welcome to how it feels to be a minority and be overruled by the majority, you made this world for others, stay a spell yourself! Â May Karma ride your g. maximus like a two-bit harlot.
Freedom!
"Voters approve same-sex marriage; opponents concede..."Â and immediately go out and marry themselves.
Â
Holy cow...what's getting into Washingtonians this year??? Freedom of choice all over the place!
@Mikey I have contacted KATU webmaster as well as KATU management concerning the inflammatory user name loveHIV.Please demand that they remove this account.If this account is not removed I will personally ask to speak to the general manager on Monday to demand that this account be deleted.