Study: 240,000 marijuana arrests in Wash. over 25-year period

SEATTLE (AP) - A new study by an advocacy group looks at how many people have been arrested for marijuana possession in Washington state over the past 25 years, and it's a big number: 240,000.
The Marijuana Arrest Research Project released a report Thursday detailing the arrest figures, based on data from the FBI. It comes as voters consider Initiative 502, which would legalize and tax pot sales at state-sanctioned stores for those over 21 under state law.
One of the study's authors is Harry Levine, a sociologist at Queens College in New York. He said it was impossible to figure out how many of the 240,000 might also have been arrested for other charges, such as assault, because of the way Washington state data are reported to the FBI.
But based on other studies of states that do separate such data, the researchers believe the overwhelming majority of the arrests were for simple misdemeanor possession alone.
"The scale of the marijuana arrest operation in the U.S. is really substantial," Levine said.
Those arrested are "overwhelmingly young people," he added. "And the most serious complication of these arrests is not the night in jail but the criminal record that results," which can create problems ranging from renting an apartment to landing a job.
The report said 79 percent of those arrested were 34 or younger, and most of those arrested were white, although minorities were arrested at a higher rate than whites based on their population. From 2001 to 2010, blacks, Latinos and Native Americans made up one-quarter of the arrests but just 14 percent of the population.
The study is at least the second recent look at marijuana arrests here. In August, a report by the state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union estimated that enforcing marijuana laws cost Washington more than $211 million over the past decade. That estimate was based on data from the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, court filings and other sources, and included costs from arrests, prosecution, public defense, jail and supervision.
The Marijuana Arrest Research Project is a New York-based, grant-funded group that researches pot arrest data for the Drug Policy Alliance, the American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations that advocate drug policy reform. It has performed similar studies in California and New York.
The study found the number of pot possession arrests has risen dramatically, from 4,000 in 1986 to 11,000 in 2010, the last year covered by the report. Echoing the findings of the ACLU of Washington, it estimated the arrests cost the state $200 million to $300 million over the past decade.
The most arrests were in the most populous county, King, which had 65,483. Pierce had 25,087; Spokane 22,716; Snohomish, 18,307; and Benton, 10,009.
Whitman County, home of Washington State University, had 474 arrests per 100,000 residents from 2001 to 2010, and Kittitas had 492. By contrast, King had 204.
The societal costs of prohibition, and the effects on those arrested, are two of the main reasons cited by proponents of Initiative 502, including three former federal law enforcement officials who participated in a television ad campaign that began Thursday.
But some others in law enforcement argue I-502 would increase marijuana access for teens, who are considered more susceptible to addiction.
If I-502 passes, marijuana would remain illegal under federal law.
The Marijuana Arrest Research Project released a report Thursday detailing the arrest figures, based on data from the FBI. It comes as voters consider Initiative 502, which would legalize and tax pot sales at state-sanctioned stores for those over 21 under state law.
One of the study's authors is Harry Levine, a sociologist at Queens College in New York. He said it was impossible to figure out how many of the 240,000 might also have been arrested for other charges, such as assault, because of the way Washington state data are reported to the FBI.
But based on other studies of states that do separate such data, the researchers believe the overwhelming majority of the arrests were for simple misdemeanor possession alone.
"The scale of the marijuana arrest operation in the U.S. is really substantial," Levine said.
Those arrested are "overwhelmingly young people," he added. "And the most serious complication of these arrests is not the night in jail but the criminal record that results," which can create problems ranging from renting an apartment to landing a job.
The report said 79 percent of those arrested were 34 or younger, and most of those arrested were white, although minorities were arrested at a higher rate than whites based on their population. From 2001 to 2010, blacks, Latinos and Native Americans made up one-quarter of the arrests but just 14 percent of the population.
The study is at least the second recent look at marijuana arrests here. In August, a report by the state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union estimated that enforcing marijuana laws cost Washington more than $211 million over the past decade. That estimate was based on data from the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, court filings and other sources, and included costs from arrests, prosecution, public defense, jail and supervision.
The Marijuana Arrest Research Project is a New York-based, grant-funded group that researches pot arrest data for the Drug Policy Alliance, the American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations that advocate drug policy reform. It has performed similar studies in California and New York.
The study found the number of pot possession arrests has risen dramatically, from 4,000 in 1986 to 11,000 in 2010, the last year covered by the report. Echoing the findings of the ACLU of Washington, it estimated the arrests cost the state $200 million to $300 million over the past decade.
The most arrests were in the most populous county, King, which had 65,483. Pierce had 25,087; Spokane 22,716; Snohomish, 18,307; and Benton, 10,009.
Whitman County, home of Washington State University, had 474 arrests per 100,000 residents from 2001 to 2010, and Kittitas had 492. By contrast, King had 204.
The societal costs of prohibition, and the effects on those arrested, are two of the main reasons cited by proponents of Initiative 502, including three former federal law enforcement officials who participated in a television ad campaign that began Thursday.
But some others in law enforcement argue I-502 would increase marijuana access for teens, who are considered more susceptible to addiction.
If I-502 passes, marijuana would remain illegal under federal law.
240,000 arrests? Â Hmm, sounds like Operation Revenue to me
Great. But how many of these voters for I-502 were arrested more than once for the same pot charges? And how many were actually convicted? Arrests do not equate with actual convictions!
Washington State - The Pot Head State
Â
Something to be very proud of.............
Â
and then it all fell apart one day and we were left with........pot heads..................joy
Â
could we have a do over please??????
Sheer lunacy. To bog down the entire justice system over these ridiculous charges and records.
This is what happens when you fail to temper justice with intelligence (mercy).
Cheech & Chong represent the Osama of this epidemic. Maybe it's time to give the Navy Seals a call.
 @Phuzz FOAD
I must have touched a nerve, lol! How could you take that statement seriously? Yeah, lets dispatch a Seals unit to ambush the actors that played Cheech & Chong. Maybe they can camoflauge themselves as pot bushes with the Benny Hill tune playing.Â
Too bad we don't completely eliminate the problem. Â Get rid of the users!! Â Then there won't be any market for the manufacturers or sellers.
@boomer ......yeah, that's rational.
what have you been smoking
Almost 10,000 people a year. Seems like kind of a waste of time for something that people are going to do and have been doing for decades.
Overheard in a Seattle coffee shop: "Yeah, he's one of those typical Seattle stoners. Greasy hair, pale skin, living on mac & cheese from Safeway."Â
How many people have been arrested for alcohol issues in 25 years.Â
That is a lot of pot addicts.
>'Â "And the most serious complication of these arrests is not the night in jail but the criminal record that results," which can create problems ranging from renting an apartment to landing a job.'
Â
Which, in turn, also increases welfare and all associated costs for the state.Â
Â
But, again, state by state isn't going to cut it. So long as the DEA continues to have it on their schedule A narc list, it's illegal. As has been demonstrated in so many instances, the feds have NO qualms whatsoever about flexing their authority over states laws.Â
Â
There is simply no angle by which I can realistically look at MJ and come away with a sound reason for it to be kept illegal. Don't use it myself (anymore), and I've seen up close the destruction that addiction can cause in a person or family, but neither of those fact sway my opinion that so long as cigarettes and alcohol remain legal, there's no reason for MJ to be kept illegal.Â
 @MarkKpicÂ
You know the advantage of the schedule system is that it only takes a mandate from the president to move something from one schedule to another or off (or on for that matter) altogether.
Â
Maybe people should attempt to try and convince the White House of doing just that.
Â
Then the DEA issue goes away.
Â
For states, they still have state laws criminalizing the stuff, so those states can prosecute those laws and even get help from the feds to enforce them.
Â
Â
 @MarkKpicÂ
Â
Actually the reason why marijuana ended up Schedule A was because of Nixon's war with hippies.
Â
Marijuana was popular (and still is) with counter culture and one way to regulate that culture was to put the drug on the highest schedule.
Â
While it was already regulated, Nixon criminalized it with the purpose of undermining hippies.
Â
But I agree with you, I think that the USDA and drug makers might take issue with its removal.
Â
 @Repoman I'd have to do some more research on that one, repo. I was under the impression that the DEA had to authorize any such actions.Â
Â
Moreover, with the influence of the pharma lobby on DC, I find it exceedingly difficult to believe that Washington would move that easily on the issue. Currently, I'm of the belief that the pharma industry is the leading reason for the continued presence of the drug on the Sched A list.Â
Â
RE: State/Federal- The reverse, I would think, would apply the same as it does now. Once the DEA were to take MJ off it's controlled substances listing, the states would likely follow suit. If, for no other reason, to lighten the costs associated with criminal prosecution of the drug and related offenses, as well as social service costs.Â
@MarkKpic - I have never seen any 'destruction' from somene who smokes MJ. I'm 50 and know many professionals who still smoke... if you want to talk destruction, maybe heroin or meth are better topics.
 @DrivingMsPatty  @MarkKpic I didn't specify MJ, what I said (and stand by my statement) is the destruction that addiction causes.Â
Â
Addiction to anything is a destructive force. MJ is no different than heroin or alcohol in that respect.Â
 @DrivingMsPatty  @MarkKpic If you only consider the potential for criminal activity when evaluating the repercussions of addictive behavioral patterns, I would conceed your point. The problem is that the problems that addiction cause are not just criminal. The strain and/or dissolution of families, the physical/mental deterioration, the social unwinding of communities and friendships because the drug or behavior of choice becomes the overriding consideration in all decisions.Â
Â
Addiction, ALL addiction, is bad. Inevitably, unquestionably, BAD.Â
Â
The reality is that every state in the country already profits from addiction in the form of cigarette, lottery and alcohol.
Â
My statements are not intended to be an endorsement or a condemnation of the MJ ballot measures. As I've stated before, I'm actually a proponent of (at least) decriminalization of MJ. My statements are a factual, honest assessment of addiction. Not everyone who uses alcohol, tobacco OR MJ is an addict, or is to become an addict.Â
@MarkKpic - I have to disagree... I have never seen anybody commit crime to support a 'pot' habit. But herion and meth have a tendency to make one lose their job, hence crime to support their need.
Kind of curious what percentage of those arrests were only for possession.  I mean other alcohol drug offences almost always involve some kind of crime that harms or affects another party.  I'm really wondering what the numbers are for pot.  Probably something they would never want the public to know till they are sure it will benefit them though. Â
 @subarulz 'He said it was impossible to figure out how many of the 240,000 might also have been arrested for other charges, such as assault, because of the way Washington state data are reported to the FBI.But based on other studies of states that do separate such data, the researchers believe the overwhelming majority of the arrests were for simple misdemeanor possession alone.'
 @MarkKpic  @subarulzÂ
Â
Laws that allow cops to simply harass people because they can.
What a huge waste of time and money. Legalize it!!!!!
Let the debate commence...
Â
Smoking pot hardens the synapses in the brain. But, don't let science tell you that.Â
 @washcomom And what does alcohol and poor diet do? And chemicals? And exhaust fumes? Everything we ingest has an effect one way or another on the body.
@washcomom and living causes DEATH
 @LostSoul Too much of anything is bad for you. Id rather have bronchitis from pot than cirrhosis or cancer from drinking or smoking. Alcohol and tobacco should be considered a public health threat and banned. When was the last time you heard of someone causing a fatality accident while stoned. Me, never.
 @PDXBEAR @LostSoul It does happen PB. While I agree with everything else you said, driving impaired from ANYthing is still driving impaired and if you've been on the roads in the northwest, you know as well as I that people have enough trouble driving without adding to it. However, that is purely a self-control issue. It's no excuse to continue to waste money enforcing a losing battle that doesn't serve the greater good of the people.Â
 @washcomom I actually read recently that it actually promotes brain cell growth. I opnly belive half of what I read, but I belive everything I see. I had what looked like a melanoma a year ago. I applied hash oil for 7 days. On the 4th day I woke up and it was really dried out and fell off after 10 days. Its good for a lot of things.
 @PDXBEAR http://www.katu.com/news/national/Glued-toddlers-mom-says-children-were-a-stress-173758151.html
Â
"Escalona admitted she smoked marijuana about twice a day before the September 2011 attack on Jocelyn Cedillo. "
Â
Marijuana didn't  impair her judgement, now did it? Or maybe her brain cells grew?Â
Â
It's a drug that can cause those who use it to become abusers of the drug, and other things, as well as people. Don't let it fool you.Â
 @terre08 If I answer this one way or the other, you will accuse me of being on the opposite side. So -here's this. It doesn't matter if I drink, or what I drink. It does matter, however, that I do things in accordance with the law. Â
 @washcomom  @PDXBEAR Are you a teetotaler or have you ever had a beer or a glass of wine?
 @PDXBEAR Show me the study that you have found your info. I found this:
Â
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051016083817.htmÂ
Â
"But Zhang cautions that HU-210 is only one of many cannabinoids. His previous work with marijuana shows that while the plant may contain medicinal compounds, they come in the same package as those that cause symptoms such as acute memory impairment, addiction, and withdrawal. Also, the HU-210 used in the study is highly purified."
Â
Â
 @washcomom Maybe, but it's their brain.
Stoners are dirtbags, but I don't have any problem with them smoking. Not my business.
Â
Leftwing idiots will blame conservatives for it being illegal, but it's the public employee unions who are the main force behind it. The cops, prison guards, fed agencies. Those unions make bank on the drug war. Wake up liberals, you're too baked to realize that your enemy is YOU.
 @Sam Adams stoners are dirtbags? some stoners are highly regarded and accomplished people.
 @Someone  @Sam Adams That doesn't mean they can't also be dirtbags. ;-)
 @Mikey  @Someone  @Sam AdamsÂ
Â
Exactly. I think stoners are dirtbags. I also think it's their own business. Maybe more people should stop voting their will on everyone else and leave everyone alone.
Â
Stinking liberals are the worst. Trying to force me to live the way they want...
 @Sam Adams Stoners are dirt bags? What about people who use it for medicine like myself? Its kinda sad because I'm a caring person who loves the people around me. Most "stoners" as you call them are exactly the same as me. Open, understanding, compassionate, peaceful and loving. Sounds like you could use a hug man. Be well.
I think it's a great revenue source and I also think it would serve as harm reduction to the younger crowds as well. It's a lot better than smoking Spice or bath salts. Its concerning to me when I read about kids flipping out or having kidney failure from consuming harsh chemicals. It would also save A LOT of money to not prosecute those that get "busted" for not being a MMJ patient. This is LONG overdue."Enforcing marijuana laws cost Washington more than $211 million over the past decade." Â I think thats proof enough.
Seems like that is probably a lot of spending of resources that could go to other things. 99% of people who smoke pot aren't ever going to bug you. The 1% who does probably would have anyway.
240,000 citizens victimized by the police state and fascist government... what a pitty.
 @!!! Bet it doesn't stop you from voting for whoever the public employee unions tell you to.
Smoking Pot doesn't destroy your life....THE GOVERNMENT DOES!