House GOP puts off vote on 'Plan B'

WASHINGTON (AP) - Confronted with a revolt among the rank and file, House Republicans abruptly put off a vote Thursday night on legislation allowing tax rates to rise for households earning $1 million and up, complicating attempts to avoid a year-end "fiscal cliff" that threatens to send the economy into recession.
In a brief statement, House Speaker John Boehner said the bill "did not have sufficient support from our members to pass." At the same time he challenged President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., to work on legislation to avert the fiscal cliff.
"The Senate must now act," Boehner, R-Ohio, said.
Emerging from a hurriedly-called evening meeting of House Republicans, Ohio Rep. Steve LaTourette said Boehner had told lawmakers he's "going to call the president and he's going to go down and talk to him and maybe they can hammer something out."
There was no immediate response from either the White House or Reid's office.
The legislation was crafted to prevent tax increases set to kick in on Jan. 1, 2013, on tens of millions of Americans. But another provision that would have let rates rise for those at the upper income range - a violation of long-standing Republican orthodoxy - triggered the opposition of anti-tax lawmakers inside the party.
The abrupt turn of events left precious little time for divided government to prevent across-the-board tax increases and deep spending cuts from taking effect with the new year. Economists say the combination threatened a return to recession for an economy that has been recovering slowly from the last one.
The House will not meet again until after Christmas, if then, and the Senate is expected to meet briefly on Friday, then not reconvene until next Thursday.
The fiscal cliff issue has dominated the postelection session of Congress. More broadly, it marks the end of a tumultuous two-year period that began when tea party-backed Republicans roared into the House demanding lower taxes, only to be asked by their leadership to bless higher tax rates at upper incomes.
Boehner said Thursday night's legislation - he'd dubbed it Plan B - marked a move to "protect as many American families and small businesses as possible from the tax hikes that are already scheduled to occur" with the new year.
Referring to one of the core themes of Obama's re-election campaign, he said the president has called for legislation to protect 98 percent of the American people from a tax hike. "Well, today we're going to do better than that," he said of the measure that raises total taxes by slightly more than $300 billion over a decade. "Our bill would protect 99.81 percent of the American people from an increase in taxes."
Democrats said that by keeping tax rates unchanged below $1 million - Obama wants the level to be $400,000 - Republicans had turned the bill into a tax break for the wealthy. They also accused Republicans of crafting their measure to impose a tax increase on 11 million middle class families.
"This is a ploy, not a plan," said Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich. He accused Republicans of being "deeply cynical," saying the legislation would scale back some education and child tax credits.
A companion bill on the evening's House agenda, meant to build GOP support for the tax bill, called for elimination of an estimated $97 billion in cuts to the Pentagon and certain domestic programs over a decade. It cleared the House on a partisan vote of 215-209 and is an updated version of legislation that passed a little more than six months ago.
Those cuts would be replaced with savings totaling $314 billion, achieved through increases in the amount federal employees contribute toward their pensions and through cuts in social programs such as food stamps and the health care law that Obama signed earlier in his term.
Ironically, the votes were set in motion earlier in the week, after Boehner and Obama had significantly narrowed their differences on a compromise to avoid the fiscal cliff.
Republican officials said that members of the GOP leadership had balked at the terms that were emerging. Democrats said Boehner's abrupt decision to shift to his Plan B - legislation drafted unilaterally by Republicans - reflected a calculation that he lacked support from his own rank and file to win the votes needed for the type of agreement he was negotiating with the president.
Asked at a news conference a few hours before the scheduled vote if that were so, Boehner avoided a direct answer. "Listen, the president knows that I've been able to keep my word on every agreement we've ever made," he said.
At the same time, Boehner hinted broadly that however Democrats end up responding to the legislation he placed before the House, it will not be the end of the attempt to keep the economy from reaching the fiscal cliff.
"Our country faces serious challenges. The president and I in our respective roles have a responsibility to work together to get them resolved. I expect that we'll continue to work together."
Obama made it clear on Wednesday that he, too, is prepared for further negotiations, and numerous officials in both parties in the Senate predicted that might happen quickly after the votes in the House.
The tax bill would prevent scheduled increases from taking effect on Jan. 1 on all income under $1 million. Above that, the current rate of 35 percent would rise to 39.6 percent, the level in effect more than a decade ago when then-President George W. Bush signed tax cuts into law that now are expiring.
The top rates also would rise on capital gains and dividends from 15 percent to 20 percent.
By any measure, the two bills in the House were far removed from the latest offers that officials said Obama and Boehner had tendered.
Obama is now seeking $1.2 trillion in higher tax revenue, down from the $1.6 trillion he initially sought. He also has softened his demand for higher tax rates on household incomes so they would apply to incomes over $400,000 instead of the $250,000 he cited during his successful campaign for a new term.
He also has offered more than $800 billion in spending cuts over a decade, half of it from Medicare and Medicaid, $200 billion from farm and other benefit programs, $100 billion from defense and $100 billion from a broad swath of government accounts ranging from parks to transportation to education.
In a key concession to Republicans, the president also has agreed to slow the rise in cost-of-living increases in Social Security and other benefit programs, at a savings estimated at about $130 billion over a decade.
By contrast, Boehner's most recent offer allowed for about $940 billion in higher taxes over a decade, with higher rates for annual incomes over $1 million.
His latest offer seeks about $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, not counting the change in the cost-of-living adjustment that Obama has said he can accept. He is seeking $600 billion in savings from Medicare and Medicaid, $200 billion from other benefit programs and $300 billion from a range of government accounts.
___
Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Alan Fram and Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.
In a brief statement, House Speaker John Boehner said the bill "did not have sufficient support from our members to pass." At the same time he challenged President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., to work on legislation to avert the fiscal cliff.
"The Senate must now act," Boehner, R-Ohio, said.
Emerging from a hurriedly-called evening meeting of House Republicans, Ohio Rep. Steve LaTourette said Boehner had told lawmakers he's "going to call the president and he's going to go down and talk to him and maybe they can hammer something out."
There was no immediate response from either the White House or Reid's office.
The legislation was crafted to prevent tax increases set to kick in on Jan. 1, 2013, on tens of millions of Americans. But another provision that would have let rates rise for those at the upper income range - a violation of long-standing Republican orthodoxy - triggered the opposition of anti-tax lawmakers inside the party.
The abrupt turn of events left precious little time for divided government to prevent across-the-board tax increases and deep spending cuts from taking effect with the new year. Economists say the combination threatened a return to recession for an economy that has been recovering slowly from the last one.
The House will not meet again until after Christmas, if then, and the Senate is expected to meet briefly on Friday, then not reconvene until next Thursday.
The fiscal cliff issue has dominated the postelection session of Congress. More broadly, it marks the end of a tumultuous two-year period that began when tea party-backed Republicans roared into the House demanding lower taxes, only to be asked by their leadership to bless higher tax rates at upper incomes.
Boehner said Thursday night's legislation - he'd dubbed it Plan B - marked a move to "protect as many American families and small businesses as possible from the tax hikes that are already scheduled to occur" with the new year.
Referring to one of the core themes of Obama's re-election campaign, he said the president has called for legislation to protect 98 percent of the American people from a tax hike. "Well, today we're going to do better than that," he said of the measure that raises total taxes by slightly more than $300 billion over a decade. "Our bill would protect 99.81 percent of the American people from an increase in taxes."
Democrats said that by keeping tax rates unchanged below $1 million - Obama wants the level to be $400,000 - Republicans had turned the bill into a tax break for the wealthy. They also accused Republicans of crafting their measure to impose a tax increase on 11 million middle class families.
"This is a ploy, not a plan," said Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich. He accused Republicans of being "deeply cynical," saying the legislation would scale back some education and child tax credits.
A companion bill on the evening's House agenda, meant to build GOP support for the tax bill, called for elimination of an estimated $97 billion in cuts to the Pentagon and certain domestic programs over a decade. It cleared the House on a partisan vote of 215-209 and is an updated version of legislation that passed a little more than six months ago.
Those cuts would be replaced with savings totaling $314 billion, achieved through increases in the amount federal employees contribute toward their pensions and through cuts in social programs such as food stamps and the health care law that Obama signed earlier in his term.
Ironically, the votes were set in motion earlier in the week, after Boehner and Obama had significantly narrowed their differences on a compromise to avoid the fiscal cliff.
Republican officials said that members of the GOP leadership had balked at the terms that were emerging. Democrats said Boehner's abrupt decision to shift to his Plan B - legislation drafted unilaterally by Republicans - reflected a calculation that he lacked support from his own rank and file to win the votes needed for the type of agreement he was negotiating with the president.
Asked at a news conference a few hours before the scheduled vote if that were so, Boehner avoided a direct answer. "Listen, the president knows that I've been able to keep my word on every agreement we've ever made," he said.
At the same time, Boehner hinted broadly that however Democrats end up responding to the legislation he placed before the House, it will not be the end of the attempt to keep the economy from reaching the fiscal cliff.
"Our country faces serious challenges. The president and I in our respective roles have a responsibility to work together to get them resolved. I expect that we'll continue to work together."
Obama made it clear on Wednesday that he, too, is prepared for further negotiations, and numerous officials in both parties in the Senate predicted that might happen quickly after the votes in the House.
The tax bill would prevent scheduled increases from taking effect on Jan. 1 on all income under $1 million. Above that, the current rate of 35 percent would rise to 39.6 percent, the level in effect more than a decade ago when then-President George W. Bush signed tax cuts into law that now are expiring.
The top rates also would rise on capital gains and dividends from 15 percent to 20 percent.
By any measure, the two bills in the House were far removed from the latest offers that officials said Obama and Boehner had tendered.
Obama is now seeking $1.2 trillion in higher tax revenue, down from the $1.6 trillion he initially sought. He also has softened his demand for higher tax rates on household incomes so they would apply to incomes over $400,000 instead of the $250,000 he cited during his successful campaign for a new term.
He also has offered more than $800 billion in spending cuts over a decade, half of it from Medicare and Medicaid, $200 billion from farm and other benefit programs, $100 billion from defense and $100 billion from a broad swath of government accounts ranging from parks to transportation to education.
In a key concession to Republicans, the president also has agreed to slow the rise in cost-of-living increases in Social Security and other benefit programs, at a savings estimated at about $130 billion over a decade.
By contrast, Boehner's most recent offer allowed for about $940 billion in higher taxes over a decade, with higher rates for annual incomes over $1 million.
His latest offer seeks about $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, not counting the change in the cost-of-living adjustment that Obama has said he can accept. He is seeking $600 billion in savings from Medicare and Medicaid, $200 billion from other benefit programs and $300 billion from a range of government accounts.
___
Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Alan Fram and Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.
The President is off to Hawaii and Congress is off for their Christmas. Eff the American people. How shameful.
It's time for the American voters, both Democrat and Republicans and Independent to mass together and fire the congress and house of representatives of their states. Elect only people that have the country as their top priority and not their own wishes at heart. It's time for us to rise up and make our voices heard.
"""""Obama is now seeking $1.2 trillion in higher tax revenue, down from the $1.6 trillion he initially sought"""""
but still up from the $800B he was seeking during the campaign.......
@kramr funny how you air an article about how even republicans can't stand their "leaders" offer and turn it towards democrats. Like how McConnel tried to blame democrats for republicans not having the votes to pass their own measure. It was almost as funny as when he had to filibuster his own bill.
@Ramsesthegreat Just so were clear I really despise both parties...... but the reality is is that it is better to work thru the R party than the losertarians in an effort to forward conservative ideals.
So if you want to ply tit for tat with political  parties....fine, i'll probably agree with you more often than not since with very few exceptions both parties are nothing but self serving  Dbags.Â
OK, get a bigger jar of Vaseline because you all have not seen anything yet!! Welcome to Obamanomics and I sure hope you can still afford your leased Volvo since anyone that voted for him loves to pay more, and more taxes for the have-nots and you deserve it, but the rest of struggling Pilgrims do not...
Personally I think the Gop needs to get ready for the plan F...fail...
Boehner's learning that the members of his caucus serve Grover Norquist, not him.
Nor their constituents who voted them into office. Pretty pathetic, isn't it?
@catherine.henry   """""Man's concealed weapons permit revoked over gun found in theater"""""
Actually I think you have it backwards......... many of the tea party freshman are acting the way that got them elected. They got elected on the promise of trying to downsize the feds or at the very least limit the growth and that is all they are doing. I.E. NOT becoming establishment R's like Boner who by the way is pretty much being  democrat lite.
they are the only ones who realize trillion dollar deficits are nothing short of insane! and none of the D's or establishment R's doing a damn thing with regards to spending..... which is FAR more of a problem than revenue.
kramr; WHO is Grover Norquist? That is who these tea partiers are bowing down to. The latest polls are indicting the majority of American people want the rich to have tax hikes and for spending to be cut is LOTS of areas (yes, even the tea partiers).
So, any elected tea party politician who continues to align themselves with Norquist is NOT taking care of the business that got them elected.Â
Why would anyone in congress vote to pass a tax raise on themselves? Whose best interest did you think they had in mind here???
I could see how the R's will have more problems with Plan B than the D's as it is basically what Pelosi put forth last spring.
Plan B S is more accurate.
Plan B raises taxes on the poor.  http://finance.yahoo.com/news/plan-b-actually-raise-taxes-184648865.html
caption should read, "ladies, please...please don't throw your panties at me...it's flattering but completely unnecessary."
Stop screwing with the taxes. Set the taxes and leave them alone for 20 years. People and businesses need to plan ahead and with politicians playing with the tax rates all the time they make for a very unstable economy.
Â
I'll tell you this, we have some real idiots leading the US to a fiscal cliff that will take down the world economy and take generations to recover.
Â
STOP SCREWING AROUND WITH TAXES AND REGULATIONS.
@RalphCramden the tax rates at the federal level haven't changed in 10 years, if taxes are the driving force for business and not demand then where are all the jobs that were promised from the Bush Tax cuts?
 @Ramsesthegreat Â
Businesses want stability. The US changes rules ever year and costs businesses lots of money. This is a huge reason that companies move out of the US including mine.
Â
Look at Nike. They wanted assurances that their tax situation would remain stable for 30 years before they invested.
Â
Government just increases taxes whenever they want to fund a new project. Businesses don't like that. I don't like that.
Â
When Oreogn increased corporate taxes I moved to a corporate tax free state. When the US was talking about increasing taxes on corporations and closing loopholes I moved out of the country. Now money is sent to an overseas business and that money is not taxable in the US. The country had a flat rate tax system and has been like that for many decades.
Â
My CPA says I am saving a ton of money in taxes. She is advising all her clients who have similar businesses to do the same.
Â
Once I moved my business out of country I sold the business and didn't have to pay any capital gains to the US. I only pay taxes when I take any income from the corporation.
Â
It feels good to avoid paying the greedy US government.
Â
The best part is that you will hate my entire post and that is priceless.
 @ormomÂ
Still waiting for your reply. Unless of course you don't have one.
@RalphCramden @ormom No, not a hypocrite. A parasite.
 @ormomÂ
Show me where I am saying one thing and doing another.
Â
I will wait for your reply.
 @RalphCramdenÂ
"A hypocrite is a person who says one thing and does another."
And if you don't recognize how that statement perfectly describes you, I'm sure plenty of others do.
 @ormomÂ
Why am I a hypocrite? Did I say one thing and do another.
Â
I have told you the truth and what I do. A hypocrite is a person who says one thing and does another.
Â
The thing that makes my day is that you hate the way I use government for my advantage and there is nothing you can do about it. It is all legal and I am here to tell you that there are a lot more folks that do exactly what I and doing. In fact others like Microsoft, Apple, GE showed me how to make it happen. For that I thank them.
Â
Even the Chinese do it to get some of that American tax money.
Â
From where I sit you are the only one left in the world not taking advantage of the government handouts.
 @RalphCramdenÂ
"Like everyone else I am grabbing all I can when it comes to government subsidies."
Â
.. while pathetically and immorally running from your responsibilities to pay for what you take - putting it off on others. Sorry to ruin your (guilt absolving?) fantasy but lots of people are not like you at all. Some people actually walk their talk and live up to the ethics they espouse. You are a hypocrite and the fact you take such pride in your hypocrisy makes it even more despicable.
 @ormomÂ
Like everyone else I am grabbing all I can when it comes to government subsidies. After all the government created these subsidies to be used and I use them....a lot.
Â
I have lots of solar panels that you helped pay for and for that I thank you. I do live off the grid at my vacation home which was also paid for by you and other taxpayers.
Â
Other than that I don't use public services that I don't pay for. My property taxes pay for the roads in front of my house, pay for police, pay for fire, pay for teachers, of which I don't need any of since I am able to take care of stuff all by myself.
Â
Before you bring up water, that is paid for in water fees. Or energy, that is paid for in energy fees. Ambulance is a paid for by services fees. The things I don't pay for I don't need.
 @RalphCramdenÂ
And in the meantime you are no doubt sucking at the benefits teat of all that big gov. consuming as much as you can while doing as much as you can to avoid paying your fair share (legally not morally) since I doubt very much you are out homesteading, living off the grid, and making your own way without benefit of public services.Â
 @ormomÂ
You are typing on a computer that was made overseas, transmitted on a device that was made overseas, routed on a device that was made overseas, run on wires that was made overseas, and picked up by me on a computer that was made overseas.
Â
Sometime you will get into a car that has most of it's parts made overseas, or ride mass transit that was made overseas, live in house that has much of it's contents made overseas and even the lumber is harvested and milled overseas if your house is less than 10 years old.
Â
No one is following my path. I am following the likes of these companies who are a lot bigger than I am.
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/popups/exporting.america/content.html
Â
We don't have anarchy, yet, and we aren't bankrupt, yet.
Â
As for breaking any laws, I have not broken any. It is all legal and from where I sit moral. I am against big government and the moral thing to do is to as much as one can to cut off the money supply.
 @RalphCramden
People will hate your post because you didn't pay your way as a citizen of the country you live in while you benefitted from the taxes of others who did. There is much to there to find fault with. It's not much different than breaking laws you disagree with rather than respecting the rule of law, even if unjust, until you can change it. If everyone followed your moral path we would have anarchy and a bankrupt economy. You are like the person who removes wildlife from a public park, despite it being illegal, simply because they want it. One theft may not make a great deal of difference, but when everyone does it (and why shouldn't they if you can) it destroys the park.
@Ramsesthegreat Correct they have not changed...... But B HO has threatened to change them numerous times and business can't forecast when the POTUS keeps threatening to change the rates
@catherine.henry That is true. but businesses in 2009 couldn't plan cause B HO talked a lot about letting the rates expire, but even many of the dems didn't want the rates going up in such a poor economy = uncertainty.
 and then in late 2010 B HO only extends them for 2 years when most businesses try and forcast at least 3 to 5 years out but the can't given the uncertainty of the knuckleheads (on both sides of the isle) in DC on making very short term decisions. And then you add the unknown expenses of BarryCare and many businesses are to scared to hire people.
@kramr; he never 'threatened' anything. The Bush tax cuts were SET to expire in 2010; Obama had nothing to do with that.
So the Republican plan is now "Obama and the senate, you guys do it. We're going home." Sounds like a great leader the house has.
Plan C ? Ya know, I just don't give a damn. This country is going down the crapper. The problem is the slow flush and the clogged sewer line !
Going over the cliff. Â Let's do it and get it over with. Â It will not affect most of us. Â The ones who are worried are the deadbeats who won't get what they were promised by obama in exchange for their vote and the democrat politicians who made those promises.
@boomer it won't affect most of us? The only ones it won't affect are the wealthy who are crying about having to pay 3% more in taxes. The middle class will, on average, see their taxes go up $4000 and the poor, who already can barely afford to live, will see their taxes go up, on average, $2000 thereby forcing even more onto government assistance due to their jobs not paying anything above minimum wage, while setting record profits and complaining about wages killing their business.
@Ramsesthegreat """""""The only ones it won't affect are the wealthy who are crying about having to pay 3% more in taxes. The middle class will, on average, see their taxes go up $4000 and the poor, who already can barely afford to live, will see their taxes go up, on average, $2000 thereby forcing even more onto government assistance due to their jobs not paying anything above minimum wage"""""""
Â
thats some amazing spin you have there........ the lower and middle class tax rates are going up 4% and the highest rates are going up 4% as well. funny how you minimize the upper end tax hike and exagerate the lower end.
BTW, if someone is making minimum wage, they would ALREADY be on food stamps and its extremely doubtful they would be paying $2k in federal taxes much less see their taxes  go up $2k.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @boomer The poor doesn't pay taxes. They profit. They get back money they never put in. My money. Why? Because they skirted out kids they couldn't afford.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @boomerÂ
Government assistance will be cut so no more folks on government assistance.
Â
The bottom line: the US is going down. Now or later, but it is going down.
Most of America blames the Republican Party for not dealing with this issue seriously. Â This is a case of 'you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all of the time'.
 @MFMFIM It is ironic that you used a quote from a Republican.
 @Dirtman Yes.
It was inevitable. If a bill has the potential to solve an actual problem you can guarantee it will not pass. I think both parties really want the tax increase and this is their strategy to get it and blame it on the other party.
Idiot. Â Boehner thought he could posture Republican politicians to avoid the heat of going over the fiscal cliff; he never actually targeted Plan B as a compromise. Â Now he's got egg nog all over his face, and everyone is laughing at how pathetic his political plan was.
Â
But I knew it was doomed to begin with; Karl Rove wrote in the WSJ in support of the political ploy; Rove's opinion is now the death sentence of Washington DC.
"Rove's opinion is now the death sentence of Washington DC." As it should be.
 @Gork Is the death sentence of Washington DC or the Republican Party? Â
Â
Â
A good answer is nether. Â Politics will go on, and so will clowns and fools.
Smoke and mirrors, smoke and mirrors.
The House Republicans successfully formed a circular firing squad. What leadership! Johnny, I think you've REALLY got something to cry about now. Maybe you could get some advice from Ms. Pelosi.