Obama takes on China as Romney shifts strategy

CINCINNATI (AP) - Appealing to Rust Belt voters, President Barack Obama announced a new trade enforcement action against China on Monday, while Republican challenger Mitt Romney planned a greater emphasis on policy details that distinguish him from Obama to stop the incumbent's election momentum.
Romney's shift comes as Republicans openly fret about the state of their nominee's campaign and press him to give voters a clearer sense of how he would govern. In newly published polls, Romney has lost the edge he held over Obama as the candidate better able to handle the federal budget deficit and taxes.
Romney pollster Neil Newhouse attributed Obama's gains to the bump the president received overall after the Democratic National Convention in North Carolina this month. But on taxes, Newhouse acknowledged Romney's need to do more to distinguish his plans.
"I'm not sure that voters really understand the differences between the plans Mitt Romney has and Obama has," Newhouse said. "And I think that's one thing we're committed to trying to do in moving forward is defining the differences between the two candidates on taxes."
One recent line of criticism from Romney appears to have brought a quick response from Obama. The White House announced a move to stop Chinese subsidies of its auto industry - four days after Romney launched an advertising campaign accusing the president of allowing American manufacturing jobs to be lost to the Asian power.
The issue hits home among working class voters in manufacturing swing states such as Ohio, where Obama has gained recently in polls and touted his new action Monday. The White House says more than 850,000 jobs in the state are related to the auto industry.
Obama told thousands gathered at a pavilion in Cincinnati's leafy Eden Park that Romney made money from companies that outsourced jobs to China while running the private equity firm Bain Capital. The crowd jeered. Obama responded, "Don't boo. Vote!"
"You can't stand up to China when all you've done is send them our jobs," Obama said. "You can talk a good game. But I like to walk the walk, not just talk the talk. And my experience has been waking up every single day doing everything I can to make sure that American workers get a fair shot in the global economy."
Romney responded in a statement accusing Obama of ignoring China for too long. The Republican promised to act from his first day in office to help U.S. businesses compete.
"Campaign-season trade cases may sound good on the stump, but it is too little, too late for American businesses and middle class families," Romney said. "President Obama's credibility on this issue has long since vanished."
Campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki said it takes "a special kind of chutzpah" for Romney to criticize Obama on China with his record at Bain.
Opinion polls since the political conventions show not only that Obama is leading in the key swing states, but a recent national poll shows he has taken over Romney's long-standing advantage on the question of whom voters view as most likely to restore the economy and create jobs. Still, the overall race remains narrowly divided.
Romney on Monday was targeting his economic message to Hispanics, a key voting bloc with whom Obama enjoys an advantage. The Obama campaign released an online video riffing on the "Extreme Makeover" television show, mocking Romney for trying to win over Hispanics even though the Obama campaign says the Republican wants to cut education and health care programs that would help them.
"Many Hispanics have sacrificed greatly to help build our country and our economy, and to leave for their children a brighter future," Romney said in excerpts released before his speech to the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Los Angeles. "Today, those sacrifices are being squandered by a president who cannot stop spending."
Romney said his test on federal spending would be whether a program is "so critical that it is worth borrowing money from China to pay for it."
The office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced Monday it has asked the World Trade Organization to intervene with China over illegal subsidies of exports in their autos and auto parts sectors. The U.S. says the practice puts American parts manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage and encourages the outsourcing of production to China.
Jobs in the U.S. auto parts sector dropped by roughly half between 2001 and 2010, while U.S. imports of auto parts from China have increased seven-fold, according to the Obama administration.
The administration is also escalating another case it brought against China at the WTO in July that accuses China of imposing unfair duties on more than $3 billion in exports of U.S. autos. The duties cover more than 80 percent of American auto exports to China, said the officials, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss publicly details of the trade action before the president announces it.
The cases stem from the Interagency Trade Enforcement Center Obama set up earlier this year to target unfair practices around the world, particularly in China.
Obama and Romney began trading barbs on China late last week.
Romney released a television advertisement Thursday accusing Obama of "failing American workers" and ignoring unfair trade practices by China. In his weekly podcast Saturday Romney said that "in 2008, candidate Obama promised to take China 'to the mat.' But since then, he's let China run all over us."
Obama countered with a TV spot focused on its claims that Romney outsourced jobs to China while working in the private sector. His campaign also released a new Web video Saturday in which Obama deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter said Romney holds investments in Chinese companies.
Romney's campaign piled on Monday with two new spots: one outlining his plan for job creation and the other assailing Obama for a growing national debt.
Romney's shift comes as Republicans openly fret about the state of their nominee's campaign and press him to give voters a clearer sense of how he would govern. In newly published polls, Romney has lost the edge he held over Obama as the candidate better able to handle the federal budget deficit and taxes.
Romney pollster Neil Newhouse attributed Obama's gains to the bump the president received overall after the Democratic National Convention in North Carolina this month. But on taxes, Newhouse acknowledged Romney's need to do more to distinguish his plans.
"I'm not sure that voters really understand the differences between the plans Mitt Romney has and Obama has," Newhouse said. "And I think that's one thing we're committed to trying to do in moving forward is defining the differences between the two candidates on taxes."
One recent line of criticism from Romney appears to have brought a quick response from Obama. The White House announced a move to stop Chinese subsidies of its auto industry - four days after Romney launched an advertising campaign accusing the president of allowing American manufacturing jobs to be lost to the Asian power.
The issue hits home among working class voters in manufacturing swing states such as Ohio, where Obama has gained recently in polls and touted his new action Monday. The White House says more than 850,000 jobs in the state are related to the auto industry.
Obama told thousands gathered at a pavilion in Cincinnati's leafy Eden Park that Romney made money from companies that outsourced jobs to China while running the private equity firm Bain Capital. The crowd jeered. Obama responded, "Don't boo. Vote!"
"You can't stand up to China when all you've done is send them our jobs," Obama said. "You can talk a good game. But I like to walk the walk, not just talk the talk. And my experience has been waking up every single day doing everything I can to make sure that American workers get a fair shot in the global economy."
Romney responded in a statement accusing Obama of ignoring China for too long. The Republican promised to act from his first day in office to help U.S. businesses compete.
"Campaign-season trade cases may sound good on the stump, but it is too little, too late for American businesses and middle class families," Romney said. "President Obama's credibility on this issue has long since vanished."
Campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki said it takes "a special kind of chutzpah" for Romney to criticize Obama on China with his record at Bain.
Opinion polls since the political conventions show not only that Obama is leading in the key swing states, but a recent national poll shows he has taken over Romney's long-standing advantage on the question of whom voters view as most likely to restore the economy and create jobs. Still, the overall race remains narrowly divided.
Romney on Monday was targeting his economic message to Hispanics, a key voting bloc with whom Obama enjoys an advantage. The Obama campaign released an online video riffing on the "Extreme Makeover" television show, mocking Romney for trying to win over Hispanics even though the Obama campaign says the Republican wants to cut education and health care programs that would help them.
"Many Hispanics have sacrificed greatly to help build our country and our economy, and to leave for their children a brighter future," Romney said in excerpts released before his speech to the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Los Angeles. "Today, those sacrifices are being squandered by a president who cannot stop spending."
Romney said his test on federal spending would be whether a program is "so critical that it is worth borrowing money from China to pay for it."
The office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced Monday it has asked the World Trade Organization to intervene with China over illegal subsidies of exports in their autos and auto parts sectors. The U.S. says the practice puts American parts manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage and encourages the outsourcing of production to China.
Jobs in the U.S. auto parts sector dropped by roughly half between 2001 and 2010, while U.S. imports of auto parts from China have increased seven-fold, according to the Obama administration.
The administration is also escalating another case it brought against China at the WTO in July that accuses China of imposing unfair duties on more than $3 billion in exports of U.S. autos. The duties cover more than 80 percent of American auto exports to China, said the officials, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss publicly details of the trade action before the president announces it.
The cases stem from the Interagency Trade Enforcement Center Obama set up earlier this year to target unfair practices around the world, particularly in China.
Obama and Romney began trading barbs on China late last week.
Romney released a television advertisement Thursday accusing Obama of "failing American workers" and ignoring unfair trade practices by China. In his weekly podcast Saturday Romney said that "in 2008, candidate Obama promised to take China 'to the mat.' But since then, he's let China run all over us."
Obama countered with a TV spot focused on its claims that Romney outsourced jobs to China while working in the private sector. His campaign also released a new Web video Saturday in which Obama deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter said Romney holds investments in Chinese companies.
Romney's campaign piled on Monday with two new spots: one outlining his plan for job creation and the other assailing Obama for a growing national debt.
What a great-big-joke this prez is...his policies just aren't working.  Wanna pay $6.00 for gas before the end of the year libbies....What a "weak sister" this man is...if only the main-street-media could tell the truth...I can see China quaking in their shoes..NOT..ever wonder how hilarious other countries find us?...
NeoCON chatter..."Obamas not doing anything"...Obama presses china to abide by WTO....NeoCON chater, "Obamas just doing it for votes"........D'OH !
Too little to late. Why did I not hear about this before Romney mentioned it this weekend. sounds like Campaign BS to me. With this and the inaction on thre riots by BHO the obaminator, I see Romney'stock going up shortly.
I have to make one comment about a bias and incorrect statement made in this article.  "Republican challenger Mitt Romney shook up his campaign strategy in an effort to stop momentum from shifting to the incumbent."
Â
Yes, Romney is changing strategy but for three weeks he has been slipping in the polls and the last poll I've seen was 49% Obama and 41% Romney. Â This is clearly be of Romney's attack ads. Â He's good at attacking, but we the voters want to know what will he do and he's not telling us that. Â
Â
In fact, on the Medicare issue that the GOP and Romney attacked Obama on the cuts he made. Â When ask what they (the Republicans) would do, the answer was make the same cuts. Â In fact, Ryan proposed the same cut the Obama made. Â So the Republicans are attacking Obama on thing they would do the same on.
Â
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
I wish there was an edit feature so I could correct my grammar, sorry about that.Â
Obama is one fancy talker... but thats it, talk. He gets nothing done.
Naw you so right bareback! he gets nothing done
,
The list of senior terrorists killed during the Obama presidency is fairly extensive.
Thereâs Osama bin Laden, of course, killed in May.
Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) leader Anwar al-Awlaki as of today.
Earlier this month officials confirmed that al Qaedaâs chief of Pakistan operations, Abu Hafs al-Shahri, was killed in Waziristan, Pakistan.
In August, âAtiyah âAbd al-Rahman, the deputy leader of al Qaeda was killed.
In June, one of the groupâs most dangerous commanders, Ilyas Kashmiri, was killed in Pakistan. In Yemen that same month, AQAP senior operatives Ammar al-Waâili, Abu Ali al-Harithi, and Ali Saleh Farhan were killed. In Somalia, Al-Qaâida in East Africa (AQEA) senior leader Harun Fazul was killed.
Administration officials also herald the recent U.S./Pakistani joint arrest of Younis al-Mauritani in Quetta.
Going back to August 2009, Tehrik e-Taliban Pakistan leader Baitullah Mahsud was killed in Pakistan.
In September of that month, Jemayah Islamiya operational planner Noordin Muhammad Top was killed in Indonesia, and AQEA planner Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan was killed in Somalia.
Then in December 2009 in Pakistan, al Qaeda operational commanders Saleh al-Somali and âAbdallah Saâid were killed.
In February 2010, in Pakistan,  Taliban deputy and military commander Abdul Ghani Beradar was captured; Haqqani network commander Muhammad Haqqani was killed; and Lashkar-e Jhangvi leader Qari Zafar was killed.
In March 2010, al Qaeda operative Hussein al-Yemeni was killed in Pakistan, while senior Jemayah Islamiya operative Dulmatin  - accused of being the mastermind behind the 2002 Bali bombings â was killed during a raid in Indonesia.
In April 2010, al Qaeda in Iraq leaders Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi were killed.
In May, al Qaedaâs number three commander, Sheik Saeed al-Masri was killed.
In June 2010 in Pakistan, al Qaeda commander Hamza al-Jawfi was killed.
Remember when Rudy Giuliani warned that electing Barack Obama would mean that the U.S. played defense, not offense, against the terrorists?
If this is defense, what does offense look like?
-Jake Tapper
Â
@swimmer So, he's good at killing people. Maybe he should be in another line of work, the job he has requires more leadership and direction in many areas other than hitting the kill switch. The economy is sinking fast and he is oblivious to it. Yes, he inherited a bad economy, but let's face facts, he was in the US Senate since 2006 - he HELPED create the situation. And he has made it worse, but then, anyone who actually believed that he was capable and up to the task was deluded. This man is a gifted speech deliverer, and that's about it.  He said he was going to cut the debt and deficit in his first term. Not only did he NOT do that, he continues to spend like money grows on trees. He has never passed a budget, which shows his inability to negotiate, lead and unify. Why would anyone consider giving four more years?
@FreedomRocks@Kachina@swimmer ...
How much damage was done, in terms of opportunity lost, when Obama rushed to tell the world, "Osama is dead...?" Anybody with a brain would have kept silent and given our forces time to act on the intelligence bonanza gathered at Osama's hideout. Of course Obama then follows-up with more details that he thought would be politically beneficial without regard to the adverse impact on the safety and effectiveness of our forces.
Â
The White House beef is the amount of the actual shooting of Bin Laden which is different from the fairy tale they presented. No huge secret in that other than the lies previously told. Being forced to give the go ahead after 3 refusals over months of watching the compound and that's a grand commander. Give us a break!
Â
 @Kachina  @swimmer Also Obama did not do the killing our Military did he just nodded his head back and forth in between rounds of golf.
 @theytriedtocensorbut-I'MBACK! I agree that he as no "Balls" to take on the Republican controlled Congress that has working against him since he was elected.Â
 @MFMFIM  @theytriedtocensorbut-I'MBACK! Ah hate to burst your liberal bubble but the dems controlled both the house and the senate for the first 2 years. You may want to brush up on reality before making sweeping statements like that.
@MFMFIM @theytriedtocensorbut-I'MBACK! He apparently has no "Balls" to take on his own party led SENATE and Harry Reid. Congress consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Civics 101.
"I agree that he as no "Balls" to take on the Republican controlled Congress that has working against him since he was elected."
Â
Perhaps you missed the 2008 election,  but the D's controlled both houses of congress.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/110th_United_States_Congress
Â
"You gotta wash your hands if you are going to handle the truth."
 @MFMFIM  @Lava Sus Manos Ya but he was voted into office in 2008 at a time when the Dems controlled both. So again catch up on the facts...
 @Lava Sus Manos I see you missed the 2010 election.  The Republicans control the House of Representatives and the Democrats control the Senate.  In the Senate, the Democrats don't have a super majority so the Republicans can filibuster and yes, control the Senate.  Â
Â
You can wash your hands (or post under a new name) all you want but you should be more concern with the truth.
 @Lava Sus Manos In the era of the Filibuster Smart Bomb, no one actually controls the Senate with less than 60 votes. Â