Romney looks to shift direction of race

WASHINGTON (AP) - With momentum on President Barack Obama's side, Mitt Romney sought Monday to explain to voters more clearly what he would do as president as he looked to right his struggling campaign and ease worries in Republican circles about its state seven weeks before Election Day.
"My plan is to help the middle class," the Republican nominee says in a new TV ad in which he promises to cut the deficit, balance the budget, reduce spending and help small business. Also, he adds: "We'll add 12 million new jobs in four years."
It was one of two new commercials he was launching in the most competitive states - the other assails Obama as bad for middle-class families - while also re-focusing his campaign appearances on his previously released five-point economic plan and starting a new effort to try to narrow Obama's advantage with Hispanic voters.
In addition, Romney was preparing to make a series of speeches aimed at offering voters a more concrete outline of his plans for the country and he's spending a significant amount of time preparing for next months' series of debates, mindful that the face-to-face meetings may be his last best hope of overtaking Obama.
The emphasis on Romney's plans for the future comes after a week in which Republican veterans of presidential campaigns publicly implored the GOP nominee to give voters a clearer sense of how he would govern, saying that simply castigating Obama wouldn't be enough to win. The new effort also follows a series of polls that show Obama with an edge nationally and in key states, and amid reports of infighting at Romney's Boston-based campaign.
With griping in GOP circles mounting, Romney and his advisers spent the weekend in Boston hashing out a plan to try to shift the dynamics of the race before the first debate on Oct. 3.
After a turbulent week that saw Romney stumbling to respond to an ongoing crisis in the Middle East, Romney chose to try to return to his comfort zone - the economy - and his argument that only he can solve stubbornly high unemployment given his decades of work in the private sector.
Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, Romney's running mate, was to emphasize that pitch this week in appearances while also zeroing in on the debt and deficit.
Romney, for his part, was starting the week with a speech Monday to the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Los Angeles, as he looks to narrow Obama's advantage with these Democratic-leaning voters in key battleground states.
The campaign also was working to counter the notion of a campaign in disarray after a Sunday story on the Politico website detailed infighting among Romney's senior staffers. Campaign advisers worked to downplay those tensions and insisted the campaign is still on track.
"Obama's entire foreign policy is in flames. The economy is terrible. Let's get a little distance from the convention," top strategist Stuart Stevens wrote in an email Sunday morning, seeking to counter the notion of a campaign in a downward spiral.
It's been a tough few weeks for Romney.
Trouble began with Clint Eastwood's rambling conversation with a chair on the final night of the Republican convention, right before Romney's keynote address omitted the war in Afghanistan or a thanks to the troops serving there.
The intervening weeks have been scattered. Romney ducked battleground states as he hunkered down in Vermont for debate preparation, then spent days defending his decision to omit war from the speech. Polls showed the Democratic convention gave Obama a boost.
Then violence erupted in Egypt and Libya, prompting Romney to issue a statement criticizing the Obama administration before it was known that an American ambassador had died in Libya. Romney doubled down on his criticism in a news conference the next day.
That drew criticism from both Democrats and Republicans alike.
Romney's team sought last week to try to shift the tide by working harder and spending more on TV. The campaign released a flight of ads for different states during the week of the Democratic convention, but later replaced almost all of them with the same ad attacking Obama's record on China.
That was just last week. The new pair of ads were rolled out Monday.
"My plan is to help the middle class," the Republican nominee says in a new TV ad in which he promises to cut the deficit, balance the budget, reduce spending and help small business. Also, he adds: "We'll add 12 million new jobs in four years."
It was one of two new commercials he was launching in the most competitive states - the other assails Obama as bad for middle-class families - while also re-focusing his campaign appearances on his previously released five-point economic plan and starting a new effort to try to narrow Obama's advantage with Hispanic voters.
In addition, Romney was preparing to make a series of speeches aimed at offering voters a more concrete outline of his plans for the country and he's spending a significant amount of time preparing for next months' series of debates, mindful that the face-to-face meetings may be his last best hope of overtaking Obama.
The emphasis on Romney's plans for the future comes after a week in which Republican veterans of presidential campaigns publicly implored the GOP nominee to give voters a clearer sense of how he would govern, saying that simply castigating Obama wouldn't be enough to win. The new effort also follows a series of polls that show Obama with an edge nationally and in key states, and amid reports of infighting at Romney's Boston-based campaign.
With griping in GOP circles mounting, Romney and his advisers spent the weekend in Boston hashing out a plan to try to shift the dynamics of the race before the first debate on Oct. 3.
After a turbulent week that saw Romney stumbling to respond to an ongoing crisis in the Middle East, Romney chose to try to return to his comfort zone - the economy - and his argument that only he can solve stubbornly high unemployment given his decades of work in the private sector.
Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, Romney's running mate, was to emphasize that pitch this week in appearances while also zeroing in on the debt and deficit.
Romney, for his part, was starting the week with a speech Monday to the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Los Angeles, as he looks to narrow Obama's advantage with these Democratic-leaning voters in key battleground states.
The campaign also was working to counter the notion of a campaign in disarray after a Sunday story on the Politico website detailed infighting among Romney's senior staffers. Campaign advisers worked to downplay those tensions and insisted the campaign is still on track.
"Obama's entire foreign policy is in flames. The economy is terrible. Let's get a little distance from the convention," top strategist Stuart Stevens wrote in an email Sunday morning, seeking to counter the notion of a campaign in a downward spiral.
It's been a tough few weeks for Romney.
Trouble began with Clint Eastwood's rambling conversation with a chair on the final night of the Republican convention, right before Romney's keynote address omitted the war in Afghanistan or a thanks to the troops serving there.
The intervening weeks have been scattered. Romney ducked battleground states as he hunkered down in Vermont for debate preparation, then spent days defending his decision to omit war from the speech. Polls showed the Democratic convention gave Obama a boost.
Then violence erupted in Egypt and Libya, prompting Romney to issue a statement criticizing the Obama administration before it was known that an American ambassador had died in Libya. Romney doubled down on his criticism in a news conference the next day.
That drew criticism from both Democrats and Republicans alike.
Romney's team sought last week to try to shift the tide by working harder and spending more on TV. The campaign released a flight of ads for different states during the week of the Democratic convention, but later replaced almost all of them with the same ad attacking Obama's record on China.
That was just last week. The new pair of ads were rolled out Monday.
Why is he boarding the plane alone? because of all the mis-steps he has been doing lately. even his own party is distancing themselves from this coward. His committee is in shambles. ryan has even distanced himself from robme. Robme is starting to come apart at the seams. obama is way ahead of this coward. since day one, the pube election party has been a circus.- they're still at it. Â
I have a brother-in-law who is from South Carolina who, during the course of some political arguing, said Obama is not smart and is an example of how affirmative action allowed an otherwise dumb person to get into Harvard. He also went on to call Michelle Obama a "f.......in c.........nt because of some remark she made. And my brother-in-law is a well educated lawyer.  This is a microcism of the state of the electorate in this country at the present time when otherwise intelligent people can't discuss political issues without resorting to this level of vitriol.
 @peckishpete I hope you married a branch from the other side of that family tree, because your brother-in-law seems to have a limited mindset.
The list of senior terrorists killed during the Obama presidency is fairly extensive.
Thereâs Osama bin Laden, of course, killed in May.
Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) leader Anwar al-Awlaki as of today.
Earlier this month officials confirmed that al Qaedaâs chief of Pakistan operations, Abu Hafs al-Shahri, was killed in Waziristan, Pakistan.
In August, âAtiyah âAbd al-Rahman, the deputy leader of al Qaeda was killed.
In June, one of the groupâs most dangerous commanders, Ilyas Kashmiri, was killed in Pakistan. In Yemen that same month, AQAP senior operatives Ammar al-Waâili, Abu Ali al-Harithi, and Ali Saleh Farhan were killed. In Somalia, Al-Qaâida in East Africa (AQEA) senior leader Harun Fazul was killed.
Administration officials also herald the recent U.S./Pakistani joint arrest of Younis al-Mauritani in Quetta.
Going back to August 2009, Tehrik e-Taliban Pakistan leader Baitullah Mahsud was killed in Pakistan.
In September of that month, Jemayah Islamiya operational planner Noordin Muhammad Top was killed in Indonesia, and AQEA planner Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan was killed in Somalia.
Then in December 2009 in Pakistan, al Qaeda operational commanders Saleh al-Somali and âAbdallah Saâid were killed.
In February 2010, in Pakistan,  Taliban deputy and military commander Abdul Ghani Beradar was captured; Haqqani network commander Muhammad Haqqani was killed; and Lashkar-e Jhangvi leader Qari Zafar was killed.
In March 2010, al Qaeda operative Hussein al-Yemeni was killed in Pakistan, while senior Jemayah Islamiya operative Dulmatin  - accused of being the mastermind behind the 2002 Bali bombings â was killed during a raid in Indonesia.
In April 2010, al Qaeda in Iraq leaders Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi were killed.
In May, al Qaedaâs number three commander, Sheik Saeed al-Masri was killed.
In June 2010 in Pakistan, al Qaeda commander Hamza al-Jawfi was killed.
Remember when Rudy Giuliani warned that electing Barack Obama would mean that the U.S. played defense, not offense, against the terrorists?
If this is defense, what does offense look like?
-Jake Tapper
Â
Are you giving credit to Obama and the US for this list?
Â
First, your list isn't solely "killed".
Secondly, there is at least 1 still alive on your list.
Third, of the 16 that I fact checked on Google, only 6 are attributed to the US.
Fourth, far more civilians were killed in missile attacks since 1/21/2009. Â
Â
(If you give him credit for killing the bad guys, he gets the credit for killing the innocents too.)
Â
6 killed by US.
3 Killed by Yemen
1 Killed by Jakarta police.
2 killed by Iraq.
2 captured by Pakistan military.
1 apprently still alive.
1 killed in 2002.
Â
Saleh al-Somali was in fact killed 12/9/09 in a missile attack.
Qari Zafar was killed on 02/24/10 in a missile attack.Â
Sheik Saeed al-Masri was killed on 5/36/10 in a missile attack.
Hamza al-Jawfi killed 6/10 in a missile attack.
Hussein al-Yemeni was killed in a missile attack 3/18/10.
Osama - of course.
Â
Abdallah Saâid is a Saudi executioner.  Apparently still alive.
Â
Abdul Ghani Beradar (sic) was captured (Feb 6th 2010) by Pakistanâs military spy agency, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence.
Younis al-Mauritani captured by the Pakistan military.
Ammar al-Wa'ili, Abu Ali al-Harithi, and Ali Saleh Farhan were killed by a Yemen jet strike.
Another Abu Ali al-Harithi was killed in November 2002 by a drone strike.
Hussein al-Yemeni was killed in a missle attack 3/18/10.
Dulmatin was killed by Jakarta police on 3/10/10.
Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi were killed by Iraqi security forces.   VP Biden praised the improved security and capacity of the Iraq forces.
Â
Where do you get your facts from?  Blogs like the SSI? Forums like the US Today "The Oval"? (Which has a list very close to yours.)
@swimmer ....
The sort of man Romney is really you can tell the sort of man he is? Because he doesn't believe the same things that you do? Can you tell the sort of man the president is when he accuses Romney of killing a steel workers wife? Can you tell the sort of man he is when he snubs the Israeli Prime minister? Can you tell the kind of man he is when he says the Cambridge Police acted stupidly? Can you tell the kind of man he is when announces unilaterally disengagement from the Middle East? Can you tell the kind of man he is when he forces churches to violate their faith for the New American Heath Care Order? Any person at any time can ask a question in the USA. I see that you and this network have a different constitution that you work from. KATU has asked none of the hard questions that normally in such a situation are asked. Also funny how coverage has all but dried up since Saturday morning.
The complacency that exists (Marines with no ammo) is both naive and dangerous to those who serve our interests abroad. The "Arab Spring" and the killing of Osama Bin Laden are not secure feathers in our cap. Few Americans can fully appreciate the ideology of a culture whose history time and again has been "the enemy of my enemy, is my friend."
Obama's lack of experience as a leader is no longer veiled by his charm. I am thoroughly disgusted with slanted information...how about giving the news fairly? All the Obama rhetoric and fawning over him only serves to further divide and anger.
Â
@
KHEBÂ Well said!!!! Not to mention the "spontenous"Â rioters who just happened to show up with RPGs, and only in Lybia. But hey, no one is going to ask the pres any hard questions, especially from the BIASED networks.Â
 Wait, did you say,  "KATU has asked none of the hard questions that normally in such a situation are asked"? did you say that? This is an associated press release. It has nothing to do with katu except that they (katu) printed it. jeez if you can't comprehend that no wonder your just rambling. a true pube.Â
 @swimmer The fact remains.  KATU has not only NOT asked hard questions, especially of their darling little demos, they have all but ignored Reps even exist....no, KATU, KGW, KOIN, KPTV...guess they don't have the guts to tell both sides, or maybe they are just blind to the facts and that there even exists another side, another opinion...so very, very sad...AS ARE YOU....when you get back from the occupier parade maybe you can do your homework...
Marines with no ammo? heard on fox news no doubt. However if you search you will come across a statement by the marine corps who days ago stated that in fact they did have ammo. but  thats the spin of weasel news. check the facts. and as for romeny,,,he's a coward who deferred three times and went to france to peddle his religion instead of doing his duty. and you back that person- sorry can't call him a man. obamas lack of experience? did you see my post or are you that blind?
 @swimmer and the intel leading to these deaths was due to.....8 years of waterboarding? under Bush?
Â
but of course. Reality check time.
can you fact check that. I mean can you show us an articule states that water boarding led to all those killings. and if it did so what? did bush do that? when bush was asked about asama, he said that he didn't worry about him. didn't think of him. didn't want to be bothered with osama. Bush even disbanded a comittee that was formed to go after asama. Oh and guess what? Obama put the comittee together again. so what are you talking about? Â
iromney, tear down those walls that hide your tax evasion agreement you signed with the irs !
 @sargerator .. how Johnny-one-note you sound....how much of an intellectual do you think you are?  I can help you out with that...does imbecile mean anything to you?  Get with the program or you'll continue to sound like a broken record...even a kindergartner could do better.....
Baffling logic, "obama didn't fix the huge mess the 8 years of republiCONs got us into in 3 1/2 plus years so vote for a republiCON to fix what republiCONs broke" ?? Mind boggling !
So what's Mitt going to do about the record number of government dependents created under Obama's watch? or the record amount of debt created under Obama's watch? or the eroded race relations created under Obama? or the eroded foreign relations created under Obama? or the record number of "citizens" created under Obama who don't pay any federal taxes? Inquiring minds would like to know.
i think you need to take your inquiring mind to the last 1.5 years of the chucklenut bush administration. it's easy to forget what obama walked into. go ahead make my chair!  Â
 @swimmer Here comes that victim mentality again... "it's easy to forget what obama walked into" Obama KNEW exactly what he was getting when he ran for office. If he STUMBLED into the office unaware, then shame on you for voting for someone so inempt. It is his duty to perform the tasks that are asked of him during his presidency, that he failed at miserably.
checkout sargerator's comment below timmy, if your too lazy to fact check
 @swimmer The Bush derangement syndrome detector is going off big time.
 @TimBurr Ask and ye shall receive.
Â
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/romney-faults-those-dependent-on-government/
It's not really important how many more jobs are added; whether it is 12 million or 4 million.
Â
It is the number of jobs retained by workers that want jobs that should be the measure.
Â
When Obama took office there were 133,010,953 people in the US with jobs. Today there are 127,495,952. (Source: Department of Labor http://www.ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp  Do the math.)
Â
Simply there are 5,605,001 fewer employed now than in January 2008 and the employable population has grown.
Â
Sure, some jobs have been created in Obama's term.  But there have been a whole lot more jobs lost than created. Then we need to look at the quality of those jobs:   Going from a "professional" to flipping burgers isn't the career path most of us would aspire to.   Â
Â
 We are going to have to change our economy and it is going to take time.  Being consumptive based isn't going to get it; it's unsustainable.
Â
Neither of these gentlemen have a presented a viable, articulated, understandable plan.Â
Ah, from january 2008 to january 2009 (under the village idiot) there were, on average, more than 500,000 jobs lost per month. Math says 6 million lost jobs before obama took office, check your numbers , looks like a gain to me !
Sorry, I meant 2009. Â
Â
However, the number of jobs stood at 133,886,830 in January 2009.  So the number lost goes to 6,390,878 fewer employed as reported by the DoL during the current administration. Â
Â
Thanks for suggesting I double check. Â
Â
Oh, by the way.  I think anyone would take the 500,000 jobs lost per month (taking your number as correct) compared to the 375,000 a week (average this year) we currently are losing
@NorthernBlackBear Regarding your link: what you are describing as "people in the US with jobs" is "Covered Employment" with the Department of Labor. Not every job is covered employment therefore the chart does not show people in the US with jobs.
@JTesla   That is correct.  Just as the 8% unemployment rate isn't the true unemployment rate.   These are the number of people that have employment that is covered by UI.   It is self-consistant - but as you say not the total number. It's what the government publishes . . .  The true numbers, I fear, would be worse.  Â
Â
Good for you that you actually go and look. Â
So the new and improved mitt will have three etch a sketch knobs????
Wow that really is different.....
The Republican party is mistakenly assuming that their radical positions are in sink with mainstreet America.The worst part of it,if they lose in Nov the powers that be in the Republican party will think it was because Gov.Romney wasn't right wing enough. I dont know how they can move any further right, but they will attempt it and the party will crumble until somebody sane steps in to redirect this train wreck.
The campaign also was working to counter the notion of a campaign in disarray after a Sunday story on the Politico website detailed infighting among Romney's senior staffers. = The more you tighten your grip, Romney, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.
 @CorporateCowMoo Hah!  Isn't he a little short for a POTUS?
Romney owns (through bain) Duncan donuts, Home Depot,  Staples, and who knows what else.
I just don't see them hiring 12 million people in 4 years....
Â
"We'll add 12 million new jobs in four years."
Â
Romney is looking to right his failing campaign but the above statement has no credibility. If Romney truly has an effective plan for adding 12 million new jobs in four years why is he not sharing it with the voters?   Absent some form of positive and reliable details Romney's statement is just more political hype from someone desperate to change the fate of a sinking ship.
Â
Romney appears to be a decent person but the more he talks the less likely I am to vote for him. If he doesn't quit stepping all over himself he won't even be close come November.
12000000 in four years. that's like 250000 every month isn't it? really? And I can pull 10 bunnies out of my ex-wife's, jesus never mind Â
@swimmer One thing few people understand is that our economy needs to add 125,000 jobs per month just to accommodate new workers entering the workforce from our own population growth. To reduce unemployment meaningfully it will take a sustained 170,000-200,000 jobs added per month for 6 to 8 years. Neither candidate can promise that and deliver.Â
@I812  Go see 2016. That will help you.Â
@I812 Experts forecast 12 million jobs being created by 2016 regardless of who is elected to be president. So no need for him to have or to reveal a plan.
@JTesla "Experts" predicted a "V" shaped economic recovery too but that did not happen. If the "experts" were that good don't you think they would have a much better track record to run on?
@I812 My point is: Romney is just telling us he would be the reason for what some "expert" said would happen even though the "expert" said it would happen regardless of who is elected.
Kasie Hunt, previously with the extreme left wing Politico is a young aggressive Progressive.She Joined the Associated (socialist) Press in August last year.  She is trying too hard to make a name for herself with word wounding, in an effort to help sway a win for the shrinking Democrat Party It shows as badly as red sauce on a white shirt.
Â
I am not surprised though that the Associated Press would print a blaringly biased story like this disguised as news. Not surprised tht KATU fills good space with this kind of word bullying either. What happened to printing NEWS, not tainted opinion .
Â
Â
I'm not sure god himself could add 12 million jobs to the US economy over the next 4 years. Â
Â
To get my vote, Mitt will have to offer enough specifics to get me to understand how some version of the Ryan budget will accomplish his goals without simply enriching the top tier of the American elite. Â If he can do that, then I will at least give him an opportunity to convince me.
Â
"Anything but Obama" is not the same as "I like Mitt". Â I need to like Mitt, or at least his policies, before I'll vote for him.
This comment has been deleted
@Bikerider So now we know mitts plan??
What a nice unbiased AP story.
Mittens has shown repeatedly he'll say anything to get elected, even if the math is impossible.
@deejm2112 Exactly like President Obama.
 @MattyPDX  @deejm2112 I'm not defending Obama, they all s*ck.
Romney is looking to shift the direction of race, meaning the direction where the only redeeming quality he has in this race, as put forth by his supporters, is that he is not Obama. He probably also wants to continue to shift direction away from any pesky comments he may make regarding foreign affairs or defining the middle class.
"Â a speech Monday to the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Los Angeles" OH ok... So like obama he is pandering to the illegal aliens. Good to know.
Poor Willard. He's spent a few weeks piloting his campaign into the ground, so now he wants to demonstrate his leadership qualities by changing the direction. He's recognized that down is the wrong way to go if he wants to win.
Â
"My plan is to help the middle class," the Republican nominee says in a new TV ad in which he promises to cut the deficit, balance the budget, reduce spending and help small business. Also, he adds: "We'll add 12 million new jobs in four years."
Â
Well there's a fresh start! Say something nice about the middle class, promise a fiscal policy that defies mathematics (when you factor in the unmentioned tax cuts for rich), and then cap it off with a jobs promise that relies on magic. Way to go, Willard!
love the way the media is orchestrating the election circus
The wonderful media has already chosen our new POTUS. Sad but true.Â
 @MrAchilles It is really the corporations that own the media. that's why they could not allow Ron Paul to have a fair shot. It's all a sham.
"The difference is that Mitt actually has worked, actually succeeded in business, actually has LED people, actually has reached across the aisle..."
My thoughts exactly. I want someone in the office that actually has business sense. The Government is a business, and Mitt has demonstrated( by his own gains) that he has the knowledge to bring the deficit back down.
 @Kachina  @randola  @shek069  @MrAchilles Disagree totally.
As long as politicians are motivated by money and supported by lobbies, corporations, special interests and the like, they are basically the same.
It doesn't matter, because the President is just a figure head anyway, and all those other people are pulling the strings. You can't honestly tell me you don't know that.
@randola @shek069 @MrAchilles The difference is that Mitt actually has worked, actually succeeded in business, actually has LED people, actually has reached across the aisle...Obama is saying the same things he said four years ago, it's recycled crap.  I haven't heard any specific plans from him, no specifics about his "jobs" plan, no acknowledgement that the past four years didn't work out well and we need to take a step back and so something different. Obama is out of ideas and out of time. Obama has catered to the unions, the radical extremeists, and most recently wants to be best friends with illegals. Too little too late. What is going on in the world now, all of the attacks on US embassies, burning of flags.....killing of US citizens, and Obama cannot be bothered.Â
 @shek069  @MrAchilles voting for romney is exactly the same. they are all owned by the same people. the illusion of choice. the real choice was muted by the system, not just the repub party.
 @MrAchilles Write in Ron Paul? You might as well vote for Obama then.
@randola LOVE RON PAUL!!!  Media did not give him the props he deserved. I still wont vote for Obama, I will write in Ron Paul if I decide not to go with Mitt... Â