Ocean Health: Crazy weather about to get even crazier
If you've noticed a change in the weather recently, you're not alone. It's been called "global weirding."
Even the nation's top weather trackers are concerned. Storms are getting stronger and the weather is growing wilder.
Storm damage is now calculated by the billions of dollars.
Compounding the problem, the critical natural resources that help protect us from the storm surges and ocean swells are disappearing.
It's a recipe for disaster; A perfect storm for storms.
As the Earth's temperature rises, the ocean heats up evaporating more water into the air, which can fuel powerful storms.
"The oceans are a major factor in weather. They store the heat that the planet accumulates, and then release it and release moisture with it," said Steve Katona, managing director of the Ocean Health Index. "It's the increased moisture in the atmosphere that contains all the energy that is driving these more intense storms."
Storm experts suggest the intensity of storms may increase dramatically.
"The kinds of changes that we're projecting are much more dramatic than anything we've seen in the last ten thousand years," said Tom Karl of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "This then would suggest that our society is going to be tested in ways that it's never been tested before with major changes in storms in the rainfall patterns, and how intensely the rain occurs."
With rising temperatures also comes rising sea levels, increasing flood risks and the intensity of storm surges.
"About 60% of the population on the entire world lives within 60 miles of the ocean. So just from a weather pattern standpoint there are huge, huge implications to what we do in coastal development and what happens to us from weather patterns because of the behavior of humans," said conservationist Beau Wrigley.
The price tag storm and flood damage is staggering.
"If you take a look at the losses from weather and climate disasters since 1980, just in the US, our losses are well over $750 billion since 1980," said Karl. "In 2011, alone we had close to $60 billion of losses from fourteen separate weather climate disasters."
Mother Nature provides protections from many of the surges, swells, and floods of these storms in the form of mangroves, salt marshes, seagrass meadows, coral reefs and even sea ice. These shoreline habitats have been destroyed to make room for farming and housing. In fact, just as storm activity begins to intensify to record levels, the Ocean Health Index found we've left many of our shorelines - and ourselves - unprotected.
The 2012 Ocean Health Index score for coastal protection score is just 73 out of 100.
"Shoreline protection is an absolutely important goal because so many of our coastal cities, as well as island nations and low lying nations, are threatened by sea level rise and increasing numbers and intensity of storms," said Katona.
Coastal cities are most at risk, but the ripple effects of these intensifying storm patterns could be felt nationwide.
To learn more, you can visit http://www.OceanHealthIndex.org
you know when I was a kid in Highschool back in the early 90's they were predicting permanet major coastal flooding by now, that has yet to materialize. I think some people have to much time on their hands justifying their positions.
ok here it is, Alaska was once tropical, we know the earth cycles,
So who are we to say it is changing to fast of too slow? Remember the Mammoths? Did they not dies where they stood? Now there is one thing about warming that I can say with out a doubt, the old diseases that have laid dormant will be returning. So if Alaska was once tropical, does it really matter that that it becomes tropical again? Maybe we Humans just need to move back away from the oceans, leave Louisiana which is sinking and get some smarts.
JUNK SCIENCE!
The 2012 Ocean Health Index score for coastal protection score is just 73 out of 100.http://www.shesoftware.com/
I grew up in Louisiana near Camp Polk. We lived in Alexandria, Lake Charles...all along the wonderful bayous and cypress hanging with Spanish Moss. The Pirates of the Caribbean ride, where you glide thru the bayou passed the little shack? That was all real in the mid to late 50's. It's no longer like that. Swamps are still there...but mangroves, the cypress...the cool thickness of the forests...those are gone. Now you have major flooding from storms that only pass thru...the delta is shrinking. If you observe...you can see things changing. Funny. No one really tells us what to do about it.
What tripe!
Global weirding? Wasn't global WARMING bad enough? Can't those so-called "scientists" make up their minds? Or are they all too busy sucking away at that Big Government teat! What this global whatever is really about is the Big Government taking away my car keys before my brother-in-law can get his hands on them. Why I'm so old and crusty... I've seen nazi propaganda that was less biased than this article!
I've seen nazi propaganda that was less biased than this article.
From story:
Â
"If you take a look at the losses from weather and climate disasters since 1980, just in the US, our losses are well over $750 billion since 1980," said Karl. "In 2011, alone we had close to $60 billion of losses from fourteen separate weather climate disasters."
Â
This is very misleading. Â For one, it does not account for the rapid population growth that has occurred within the same time frame in those most vulnerable areas (coastal areas, floodplains, sloped hillsides, etc). We have no shortage of examples here in the Portland area where such things are routinely done. Â Beau is casually overlooking the fact that people tend to go where people already are, and projecting forward, than only exacerbates the growth in the rapidly growing areas -- areas, which can often not accommodate nor support it. Â
Second, the citation of an absolute monetary damage value is meaningless because it lacks a reference comparison or proportion -- eg. what was the total damage from "weather and climate disasters" in the thirty years or so preceding 1980? Hmmmm, some people might dare ask such a question.. but, Mr. Beau conveniently didn't bother to even mention that [and, in the interest of accuracy and objectivity, those damage estimates should be standardized to current dollar equivalents and adjusted for inflation as well]. Â
Gosh, science is so darn complicated: 'details, details, details', -- some people just can't get their mind around it.
http://www.oceanhealthindex.org/About/Sustaining_Partners/
Â
Wow, so this Beau Wrigley (as in the chewing gum, the Chicago stadium..?) put up a bunch of money to start a non-profit that was one of his little pet projects... OK, WOW! .. .Not.
Does the guy have any, I mean, ANY background in weather/climate, oceanography, etc? Nah, didn't think so.
Â
Accurately predicting short term weather changes is a fairly complicated task -- predicting it over even a few human generations is an exponentially more complex task. Â Scientifically speaking, it is not adequate to say or conclude that "the climate is changing [let's presume WARMING..]", but to be a valid prediction or hold validity, the science must be able to say WHY it is changing [warming] and do so on a repeatable and accurate basis. Â
So, in other words, read articles like these with a very critical eye and don't be quite so quick to believe everything you read.
Yet another bi-product of Hope and Change
 @Lo Pan No its another bi-product of burning bio-fuels for more than 100 years and not caring about long term effects that it has on the environment or people in general. You might want to leave politics where it belongs, in the political news section. Since Hope and Change was only the last four years your time line is a bit skewed with your comment anyways.
Ok so you want to talk science. I have yet to see the science supporting the claims you global change people are always crying about. Everytime a major "study" supporting climate change is publised we are always finding out years later about the flaws in the study. the Flaws in the reporting, and in some cases manipulation of data.Â
Â
Got news for most of you but this earth has undergone many transformations over its life time, many well before you could blame man. Time we face the fact that while we impact our local environments the Earth will do what it wants.Â
@Lo Pan I really hope you're simply making a pathetic attempt at trolling and aren't actually serious because if you are, I feel immensely sorry for you having to go through life believing such ignorance.
@Motorhead79 Lo Pan doesn't need to believe in ignorance, he/she is the living embodiment of ignorance. His/her statement is testament to that fact.